Victor A, Larsson G, Asbrink A S
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Uppsala University, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Sweden.
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1987;21(4):277-9. doi: 10.3109/00365598709180782.
A pad-weighing test for the quantitation of urinary loss, performed by the patient during 48 hours of daily activities, was evaluated. All patients (n = 46, age 21-73 years) were able to perform the test. The precision of their weighing was good and the reproducibility of the results equal or better than that of previously published tests. There was no correlation between the results of the 48-hour test and a standardized one-hour test, indicating that these two tests measure different aspects of incontinence. Of the two tests the 48-hour test likely gives a more valid measure of the symptom of urinary incontinence. Other advantages over the standardized short term tests are that no hospital staff is involved in the testing and that the test is independent of the physical capacity of the patient.
对一项由患者在日常活动的48小时内进行的用于定量尿失禁量的尿垫称重测试进行了评估。所有患者（n = 46，年龄21 - 73岁）均能完成该测试。他们称重的精度良好，结果的可重复性等于或优于先前发表的测试。48小时测试结果与标准化的1小时测试结果之间无相关性，表明这两种测试测量的是尿失禁的不同方面。在这两种测试中，48小时测试可能更有效地衡量尿失禁症状。与标准化短期测试相比的其他优点是测试无需医院工作人员参与，且该测试与患者的身体能力无关。
