Suppr超能文献

垫重测试:量化尿失禁患者尿液流失的最佳方法。

Pad weighing tests: the best way to quantify urine loss in patients with incontinence.

作者信息

Siltberg H, Victor A, Larsson G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.

出版信息

Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand Suppl. 1997;166:28-32.

PMID:9253375
Abstract

This article reviews the literature on pad weighing tests composed to measure urinary incontinence. The tests can be divided into short-term tests (one to two hours) performed in a clinic or laboratory, or long-term tests (12 to 48 hours) performed by the patient at home. The short-term tests, apart from practical disadvantages, have low negative predictive value and require retrograde filling of the bladder to reach acceptable reproducibility. The long-term tests have practical advantages, better sensitivity and acceptable reproducibility. Pad weighing tests have no value for the purpose of differential diagnosis. The validity of the long-term test as a measure of the symptom of urinary incontinence is obvious whereas it is unclear what the short-term test measures.

摘要

本文综述了用于测量尿失禁的尿垫称重试验的相关文献。这些试验可分为在诊所或实验室进行的短期试验(一至两小时),或由患者在家中进行的长期试验(12至48小时)。短期试验除了存在实际缺点外,阴性预测值较低,并且需要膀胱逆行充盈以达到可接受的重复性。长期试验具有实际优势、更好的敏感性和可接受的重复性。尿垫称重试验对于鉴别诊断没有价值。长期试验作为尿失禁症状测量方法的有效性是显而易见的,而短期试验测量的是什么尚不清楚。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验