State Key Laboratory for Molecular Virology and Genetic Engineering, National Institute for Viral Disease Control and Prevention, Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Beijing 102206, China.
Center for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Wuhan Institute of Virology, Center for Biosafety Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China.
Viruses. 2021 Jul 30;13(8):1508. doi: 10.3390/v13081508.
The development of rapid serological detection methods re urgently needed for determination of neutralizing antibodies in sera. In this study, four rapid methods (ACE2-RBD inhibition assay, S1-IgG detection, RBD-IgG detection, and N-IgG detection) were established and evaluated based on chemiluminescence technology. For the first time, a broadly neutralizing antibody with high affinity was used as a standard for the quantitative detection of SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralizing antibodies in human sera. Sera from COVID-19 convalescent patients (N = 119), vaccinated donors (N = 86), and healthy donors (N = 299) confirmed by microneutralization test (MNT) were used to evaluate the above methods. The result showed that the ACE2-RBD inhibition assay calculated with either ACE2-RBD binding inhibition percentage rate or ACE2-RBD inhibiting antibody concentration were strongly correlated with MNT (r ≥ 0.78, < 0.0001) and also highly consistent with MNT (Kappa Value ≥ 0.94, < 0.01). There was also a strong correlation between the two evaluation indices (r ≥ 0.99, < 0.0001). Meanwhile, S1-IgG and RBD-IgG quantitative detection were also significantly correlated with MNT (r ≥ 0.73, < 0.0001), and both methods were highly correlated with each other (r ≥ 0.95, < 0.0001). However, the concentration of N-IgG antibodies showed a lower correlation with the MNT results (r < 0.49, < 0.0001). The diagnostic assays presented here could be used for the evaluation of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine immunization effect and serological diagnosis of COVID-19 patients, and could also have guiding significance for establishing other rapid serological methods to surrogate neutralization tests for SARS-CoV-2.
快速血清学检测方法的发展对于确定血清中的中和抗体至关重要。本研究基于化学发光技术建立并评估了四种快速方法(ACE2-RBD 抑制测定法、S1-IgG 检测法、RBD-IgG 检测法和 N-IgG 检测法)。首次使用高亲和力的广谱中和抗体作为标准,对人血清中 SARS-CoV-2 特异性中和抗体进行定量检测。本研究使用微量中和试验(MNT)确认的 COVID-19 恢复期患者血清(N=119)、接种疫苗供体血清(N=86)和健康供体血清(N=299)评估了上述方法。结果表明,ACE2-RBD 抑制测定法(以 ACE2-RBD 结合抑制率或 ACE2-RBD 抑制抗体浓度计算)与 MNT 呈强相关(r≥0.78,<0.0001),与 MNT 高度一致(Kappa 值≥0.94,<0.01)。两种评价指标之间也存在强相关性(r≥0.99,<0.0001)。同时,S1-IgG 和 RBD-IgG 的定量检测也与 MNT 显著相关(r≥0.73,<0.0001),且两种方法之间具有高度相关性(r≥0.95,<0.0001)。然而,N-IgG 抗体浓度与 MNT 结果的相关性较低(r<0.49,<0.0001)。本研究提供的诊断检测方法可用于评估 SARS-CoV-2 疫苗免疫效果和 COVID-19 患者的血清学诊断,对建立替代 SARS-CoV-2 中和试验的其他快速血清学方法也具有指导意义。