Suppr超能文献

TECOmedical 和 DiaPROPH-Med 的抗 SARS-CoV-2 替代中和试验与来自接种疫苗和感染个体的样本的比较。

Comparison of the Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Surrogate Neutralization Assays by TECOmedical and DiaPROPH-Med with Samples from Vaccinated and Infected Individuals.

作者信息

Münsterkötter Lennart, Hollstein Moritz Maximilian, Hahn Andreas, Kröger Andrea, Schnelle Moritz, Erpenbeck Luise, Groß Uwe, Frickmann Hagen, Zautner Andreas Erich

机构信息

Institute for Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Centre Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.

出版信息

Viruses. 2022 Feb 3;14(2):315. doi: 10.3390/v14020315.

Abstract

Anti-SARS-CoV-2-specific serological responses are a topic of ongoing evaluation studies. In the study presented here, the anti-SARS-CoV-2 surrogate neutralization assays by TECOmedical and DiaPROPH -Med were assessed in a head-to-head comparison with serum samples of individuals after vaccination as well as after previous infection with SARS-CoV-2. In case of discordant results, a cell culture-based neutralization assay was applied as a reference standard. The TECOmedical assay showed sensitivity and specificity of 100% and 61.3%, respectively, the DiaPROPH-Med assay 95.0% and 48.4%, respectively. As a side finding of the study, differences in the likelihood of expressing neutralizing antibodies could be shown for different exposition types. So, 60 of 81 (74.07%) of the samples with only one vaccination showed an expression of neutralizing antibodies in contrast to 85.71% (60 of 70 samples) of the samples with two vaccinations and 100% (40 of 40) of the samples from previously infected individuals. In conclusion, the both assays showed results similar to previous assessments. While the measured diagnostic accuracy of both assays requires further technical improvement of this diagnostic approach, as the calculated specificity values of 61.3% and 48.4%, respectively, appear acceptable for diagnostic use only in populations with a high percentage of positive subjects, but not at expectedly low positivity rates.

摘要

抗SARS-CoV-2特异性血清学反应是正在进行的评估研究的一个主题。在本文介绍的研究中,对TECOmedical和DiaPROPH -Med的抗SARS-CoV-2替代中和试验与接种疫苗以及先前感染过SARS-CoV-2的个体的血清样本进行了直接比较评估。在结果不一致的情况下,采用基于细胞培养的中和试验作为参考标准。TECOmedical试验的敏感性和特异性分别为100%和61.3%,DiaPROPH-Med试验分别为95.0%和48.4%。作为该研究的一个附带发现,对于不同的暴露类型,可以显示出表达中和抗体的可能性存在差异。因此,仅接种一剂疫苗的81份样本中有60份(74.07%)显示出中和抗体的表达,相比之下,接种两剂疫苗的样本中有85.71%(70份样本中的60份)以及先前感染个体的样本中有100%(40份样本中的40份)显示出中和抗体的表达。总之,这两种试验的结果与先前的评估相似。虽然这两种试验测得的诊断准确性需要对这种诊断方法进行进一步的技术改进,因为分别计算出的61.3%和48.4%的特异性值仅在阳性受试者比例较高的人群中用于诊断时似乎是可接受的,但在预期阳性率较低的情况下则不然。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4260/8877287/b77f11076b44/viruses-14-00315-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验