• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

长江流域灰水足迹效率的衡量及其驱动因素。

Measurement and driving factors of grey water footprint efficiency in Yangtze River Basin.

机构信息

School of Business, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.

School of Business, Hohai University, Nanjing 211100, China.

出版信息

Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 1;802:149587. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149587. Epub 2021 Aug 14.

DOI:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149587
PMID:34454151
Abstract

Water shortages and poor water quality have become an urgent problem that is constraining the sustainable development of China. Grey water has been found to bring greater stress on the water supply than freshwater consumption, and the grey water footprint (GWF) has received significant attention as a comprehensive indicator to assess wastewater pollution. In this study, we analysed the grey water footprint in the Yangtze River Basin from 2003 to 2017 and established a Logarithmic mean divisia index (LMDI) model to decompose the grey water footprint efficiency into six key factors. Our findings are as follows: (1) The average grey water footprint (AGWF) in the central regions was 40% higher than eastern region and 172% higher than western region; (2) Economic effects and capital deepening effects are the main factors affecting positive changes in grey water footprint efficiency; (3) Based on an analysis of the driving factors of greywater footprint efficiency in each province, we conducted a territorial classification according to the primary driving factors in each province. Our results reflect the spatial distribution characteristics of the influencing factors on the grey water footprint effect in the Yangtze River Basin and will enable the government to formulate relevant policies for each subregion.

摘要

水资源短缺和水质较差已成为制约中国可持续发展的紧迫问题。已发现灰水对供水的压力大于淡水消耗,灰水足迹(GWF)作为评估废水污染的综合指标受到了极大关注。本研究分析了 2003 年至 2017 年长江流域的灰水足迹,并建立了对数平均迪氏分解指数(LMDI)模型,将灰水足迹效率分解为六个关键因素。我们的研究结果如下:(1)中部地区的平均灰水足迹(AGWF)比东部地区高 40%,比西部地区高 172%;(2)经济效应和资本深化效应是影响灰水足迹效率正向变化的主要因素;(3)基于对各省灰水足迹效率驱动因素的分析,根据各省的主要驱动因素进行了地域分类。研究结果反映了长江流域灰水足迹效应影响因素的空间分布特征,将有助于政府为各子区域制定相关政策。

相似文献

1
Measurement and driving factors of grey water footprint efficiency in Yangtze River Basin.长江流域灰水足迹效率的衡量及其驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Jan 1;802:149587. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149587. Epub 2021 Aug 14.
2
Spatial-temporal evolution and driving factors of grey water footprint efficiency in the Yangtze River Economic Belt.长江经济带灰水足迹效率的时空演变及驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Oct 20;844:156930. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156930. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
3
Dynamic decomposition and regional differences of urban emergy ecological footprint in the Yangtze River Delta.长三角城市能值生态足迹的动态分解与区域差异。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Jan 15;326(Pt B):116698. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116698. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
4
Study on Regional Differences and Convergence of Green Development Efficiency of the Chemical Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Grey Water Footprint.基于灰水足迹的长江经济带化工行业绿色发展效率的区域差异与收敛性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 2;19(3):1703. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031703.
5
Variation and internal-external driving forces of grey water footprint efficiency in China's Yellow River Basin.中国黄河流域灰水足迹效率的变化及内外驱动力。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0283199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283199. eCollection 2023.
6
Grey water footprint evaluation and driving force analysis of eight economic regions in China.中国八个经济区域的灰水足迹评价及驱动力分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(16):20380-20391. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08450-8. Epub 2020 Apr 2.
7
Forecasting the Amount of Waste-Sewage Water Discharged into the Yangtze River Basin Based on the Optimal Fractional Order Grey Model.基于最优分数阶灰色模型预测长江流域污水排放量。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 23;15(1):20. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15010020.
8
The gap of water supply-Demand and its driving factors: From water footprint view in Huaihe River Basin.供需水缺口及其驱动因素:基于淮河流域水足迹视角
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 4;16(3):e0247604. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247604. eCollection 2021.
9
Carbon footprint of cotton production in China: Composition, spatiotemporal changes and driving factors.中国棉花生产的碳足迹:构成、时空变化和驱动因素。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 May 15;821:153407. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153407. Epub 2022 Jan 25.
10
[Spatial Distribution Pattern and Influencing Factors of Industrial Pollution Emissions in Yangtze River Economic Belt].长江经济带工业污染排放的空间分布格局及影响因素
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2021 Aug 8;42(8):3820-3828. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.202011017.

引用本文的文献

1
Decoupling of industrial water consumption and economic expansion in the Yangtze River Economic Belt: a comparative analysis across three Five-Year plans.长江经济带工业用水与经济增长脱钩:三个五年规划的比较分析
Sci Rep. 2025 Jul 1;15(1):21186. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-06042-5.
2
Monitoring grey water footprint and associated environmental controls in agricultural watershed.监测农业流域中的灰水足迹及其相关环境控制。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Feb;31(7):11334-11348. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-31961-7. Epub 2024 Jan 13.
3
Variation and internal-external driving forces of grey water footprint efficiency in China's Yellow River Basin.
中国黄河流域灰水足迹效率的变化及内外驱动力。
PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0283199. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0283199. eCollection 2023.
4
Exploring the Regional Coordination Relationship between Water Utilization and Urbanization Based on Decoupling Analysis: A Case Study of the Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region.基于脱钩分析探讨用水与城市化的区域协调关系——以京津冀地区为例。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 1;19(11):6793. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116793.
5
Study on Regional Differences and Convergence of Green Development Efficiency of the Chemical Industry in the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Grey Water Footprint.基于灰水足迹的长江经济带化工行业绿色发展效率的区域差异与收敛性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 2;19(3):1703. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031703.