Thoracic Surgery Department, Qingdao University Affiliated Municipal Hospital, No. 1 Jiaozhou Road, Shibei District, Qingdao, 266011, Shandong Province, China.
Qingdao University Affiliated Municipal Hospital, No. 25 Donghai Middle Road, Shinan District, Qingdao, 266071, Shandong Province, China.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Feb;30(2):1209-1220. doi: 10.1007/s00520-021-06516-y. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
The present study aimed to investigate the status and significantly influencing factors of treatment and prognosis perceptions among advanced cancer patients based on patient-reported outcome.
A cross-sectional study was conducted at two tertiary A general hospitals. From June to September 2019, 300 patients were invited and 292 of them participated in this study. Except for 9 invalid questionnaires, 283 pen-paper questionnaires including sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, Chinese Version of Prognosis and Treatment Perception Questionnaire, Herth Hope Index, and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were well completed. Descriptive analysis, Pearson's correlation test, logistic regression analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis were applied for analysis.
One hundred seventy-five (61.8%) advanced cancer patients reported inaccurate treatment perception. Prognosis perception scored 87.9 ± 13.72 indicating a middle level of prognosis perception. Fourteen (4.9%), 138 (48.8%), and 131 (46.3%) patients presented low, middle, and high prognosis perception levels, respectively. In patients, without spouse and religion beliefs, received chemoradiotherapy, diagnosed as cancer equal to or less than 1 year, and higher hope level were inaccurate treatment perception's risk factors. Younger age, longer diagnosis time, higher educational level, less support for medical expenses payment, receiving chemoradiotherapy, and lower hope level but more anxiety and depression symptoms were positive predictors of prognosis perception.
A majority of advanced cancer patients in this study reported inaccurate treatment and middle level of prognosis perception influencing by objective and subjective factors. Clinical interventions could be developed referring these impacting factors originating from patient-reported outcome.
本研究旨在基于患者报告的结果,调查晚期癌症患者治疗和预后感知的现状及其显著影响因素。
采用横断面研究方法,在两家三级 A 综合医院进行。2019 年 6 月至 9 月,共邀请 300 名患者,其中 292 名患者参与了本研究。除 9 份无效问卷外,还完成了 283 份纸笔问卷,内容包括人口统计学和临床特征、中文版预后和治疗感知问卷、Herth 希望指数和医院焦虑抑郁量表。采用描述性分析、Pearson 相关检验、logistic 回归分析和多元线性回归分析进行分析。
175 名(61.8%)晚期癌症患者报告了不准确的治疗感知。预后感知评分为 87.9±13.72,表明预后感知处于中等水平。14 名(4.9%)、138 名(48.8%)和 131 名(46.3%)患者分别呈现出低、中、高预后感知水平。在没有配偶和宗教信仰、接受放化疗、诊断时间等于或小于 1 年、希望水平较高的患者中,治疗感知不准确的风险较高。年龄较小、诊断时间较长、教育程度较高、医疗费用支付支持较少、接受放化疗、希望水平较低但焦虑和抑郁症状较多是预后感知的正向预测因素。
本研究中大多数晚期癌症患者报告了不准确的治疗和中等水平的预后感知,这受到客观和主观因素的影响。临床干预措施可以根据这些源自患者报告的结果的影响因素来制定。