• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学科学教育工作者选择研究范式指南:构建更好研究的基础

A Medical Science Educator's Guide to Selecting a Research Paradigm: Building a Basis for Better Research.

作者信息

Brown Megan E L, Dueñas Angelique N

机构信息

Health Professions Education Unit, Hull York Medical School, John Hughlings Jackson Building, University Road, Heslington, York, YO10 5DD UK.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2019 Dec 27;30(1):545-553. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00898-9. eCollection 2020 Mar.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-019-00898-9
PMID:34457699
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8368685/
Abstract

A research paradigm, or set of common beliefs about research, should be a key facet of any research project. However, despite its importance, there is a paucity of general understanding in the medical sciences education community regarding what a research paradigm consists of and how to best construct one. With the move within medical sciences education towards greater methodological rigor, it is now more important than ever for all educators to understand simply how to better approach their research via paradigms. In this monograph, a simplified approach to selecting an appropriate research paradigm is outlined. Suggestions are based on broad literature, medical education sources, and the author's own experiences in solidifying and communicating their research paradigms. By assisting in detailing the philosophical underpinnings of individuals research approaches, this guide aims to help all researchers improve the rigor of their projects and improve upon overall understanding in research communication.

摘要

一种研究范式,即关于研究的一套共同信念,应该是任何研究项目的关键要素。然而,尽管其很重要,但医学教育界对研究范式的构成以及如何最好地构建一个研究范式普遍缺乏了解。随着医学教育朝着更严格的方法论方向发展,现在对所有教育工作者来说,理解如何通过范式更好地开展研究比以往任何时候都更加重要。在这本专著中,概述了一种选择合适研究范式的简化方法。这些建议基于广泛的文献、医学教育资源以及作者自身在巩固和传达其研究范式方面的经验。通过协助详细阐述个人研究方法的哲学基础,本指南旨在帮助所有研究人员提高其项目的严谨性,并增进研究交流中的整体理解。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66d0/8368685/218098f1d6e1/40670_2019_898_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66d0/8368685/870a4ffe8bf5/40670_2019_898_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66d0/8368685/e5980defc060/40670_2019_898_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66d0/8368685/218098f1d6e1/40670_2019_898_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66d0/8368685/870a4ffe8bf5/40670_2019_898_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66d0/8368685/e5980defc060/40670_2019_898_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/66d0/8368685/218098f1d6e1/40670_2019_898_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
A Medical Science Educator's Guide to Selecting a Research Paradigm: Building a Basis for Better Research.医学科学教育工作者选择研究范式指南:构建更好研究的基础
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Dec 27;30(1):545-553. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00898-9. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Paradigms in medicine: consequences for medical education.医学范式:对医学教育的影响
J Med Educ. 1975 Jan;50(1):66-9.
3
The nursing educator's role in e-learning: a literature review.护理教育工作者在电子学习中的角色:文献综述
Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Nov;34(11):1382-7. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2014.04.002. Epub 2014 Apr 24.
4
Paradigms unfolded - developing, validating, and evaluating the Medical Education e-Professionalism framework from a philosophical perspective.范式展开——从哲学角度构建、验证和评估医学教育电子职业精神框架。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Oct 19;10:1230620. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1230620. eCollection 2023.
5
Epistemology for interdisciplinary research - shifting philosophical paradigms of science.跨学科研究的认识论——科学哲学范式的转变
Eur J Philos Sci. 2019;9(1):16. doi: 10.1007/s13194-018-0242-4. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
6
Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education.关于客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)体验的现象学研究方法、方法学挑战及经验教训:医学教育中范式驱动的定性方法概述
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Nov 23;49:19-23. doi: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.11.013. eCollection 2020 Jan.
7
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for survey design.教育者蓝图:调查设计操作指南
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Aug 23;6(4):e10796. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10796. eCollection 2022 Aug.
8
Professional development: a guide to the educator's portfolio.专业发展:教育工作者档案指南。
Am J Physiol. 1996 Dec;271(6 Pt 3):S10-3. doi: 10.1152/advances.1996.271.6.S10.
9
Educator's blueprint: Key considerations for using social media in survey-based medical education research.教育者蓝图:基于调查的医学教育研究中使用社交媒体的关键考量因素
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Sep 23;8(5):e11026. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11026. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
Educator's blueprint: A primer on consensus methods in medical education research.教育者蓝图:医学教育研究中的共识方法入门
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jul 11;7(4):e10891. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10891. eCollection 2023 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Stepping into the role of a doctor: an instrumental case study to explore the experiences of third-year medical students in a simulated general practice clinic.踏入医生角色:一项探索三年级医学生在模拟全科诊所经历的工具性案例研究。
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2538540. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2538540. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
2
Scoping Review: The Effectiveness of Interprofessional Virtual Reality Simulation.范围综述:跨专业虚拟现实模拟的有效性
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2025 Jul 17;12:23821205251346327. doi: 10.1177/23821205251346327. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec.
3
Digital inequities and emotional resilience: understanding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on preclinical medical students.

本文引用的文献

1
Commentary: Paradigms, Axiology, and Praxeology in Medical Education Research.评论:医学教育研究中的范式、价值观和实践论。
Acad Med. 2018 Nov;93(11S Association of American Medical Colleges Learn Serve Lead: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Research in Medical Education Sessions):S1-S7. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002384.
2
Shedding the cobra effect: problematising thematic emergence, triangulation, saturation and member checking.摆脱眼镜蛇效应:主题浮现、三角验证、饱和和成员核查问题化。
Med Educ. 2017 Jan;51(1):40-50. doi: 10.1111/medu.13124.
3
Choosing a Qualitative Research Approach.
数字不平等与情绪恢复力:理解新冠疫情对临床前医学生的影响
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jun 12;12:1559536. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1559536. eCollection 2025.
4
Tensions in Patient and Family Partner Storytelling in Clinical Education: Navigating the Who, What and How of Knowing.临床教育中患者及家属讲述经历时的紧张关系:把握知晓的主体、内容及方式
Clin Teach. 2025 Aug;22(4):e70116. doi: 10.1111/tct.70116.
5
Navigating Person-Centred Nutrition and Mealtime Care in Rehabilitation: A Conceptual Model.康复中以患者为中心的营养与用餐护理导航:一个概念模型
J Hum Nutr Diet. 2025 Jun;38(3):e70079. doi: 10.1111/jhn.70079.
6
Final year medical students' expectations for medical education on climate change and planetary health - a qualitative study.医学专业最后一年学生对气候变化与地球健康医学教育的期望——一项定性研究
Med Educ Online. 2025 Dec;30(1):2477670. doi: 10.1080/10872981.2025.2477670. Epub 2025 Mar 21.
7
Seven questions for a student's donor: Evaluation of a fictional conversation lends insight into professional identity formation in medical students.向医学生捐赠者提出的七个问题:对一段虚构对话的评估有助于深入了解医学生职业身份的形成。
Anat Sci Educ. 2025 May;18(5):425-435. doi: 10.1002/ase.70023. Epub 2025 Mar 19.
8
Factors influencing -pharmacy adoption in India: A study of user experiences through interpretative phenomenological analysis.影响印度药房采用情况的因素:通过解释现象学分析对用户体验的研究
Explor Res Clin Soc Pharm. 2024 Dec 12;17:100550. doi: 10.1016/j.rcsop.2024.100550. eCollection 2025 Mar.
9
Reflection and self-efficacy for clinical skills.临床技能的反思与自我效能感。
Clin Teach. 2025 Feb;22(1):e13833. doi: 10.1111/tct.13833. Epub 2024 Nov 11.
10
Early Exposure of Medical Students to a Formal Research Program Promotes Successful Scholarship in a Multi-Campus Medical School.医学生早期接触正式研究项目可促进多校区医学院的学术成就。
Med Sci Educ. 2024 Jun 17;34(5):1091-1103. doi: 10.1007/s40670-024-02098-6. eCollection 2024 Oct.
选择一种定性研究方法。
J Grad Med Educ. 2015 Dec;7(4):669-70. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-15-00414.1.
4
The outcomes of recent patient safety education interventions for trainee physicians and medical students: a systematic review.近期针对实习医生和医学生的患者安全教育干预措施的效果:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2015 May 20;5(5):e007705. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-007705.
5
AM last page: A guide to research paradigms relevant to medical education.最后一页:与医学教育相关的研究范式指南。
Acad Med. 2012 Apr;87(4):545. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31824fbc8a.
6
Theoretical perspectives in medical education: past experience and future possibilities.医学教育理论视角:过去的经验与未来的可能。
Med Educ. 2011 Jan;45(1):60-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2010.03757.x.
7
Research paradigms in medical education research.医学教育研究中的研究范式。
Med Educ. 2010 Apr;44(4):358-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03611.x.
8
Conceptual frameworks to illuminate and magnify.用于阐明和放大的概念框架。
Med Educ. 2009 Apr;43(4):312-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03295.x.
9
Picking up the gauntlet: constructing medical education as a social science.接受挑战:将医学教育构建为一门社会科学。
Med Educ. 2009 Mar;43(3):196-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03272.x.
10
Qualitative research in the RIME community: critical reflections and future directions.RIME 社区中的定性研究:批判性反思与未来方向。
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10 Suppl):S129-30. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318140593e.