• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

教育者蓝图:医学教育研究中的共识方法入门

Educator's blueprint: A primer on consensus methods in medical education research.

作者信息

Gottlieb Michael, Caretta-Weyer Holly, Chan Teresa M, Humphrey-Murto Susan

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine Rush University Medical Center Chicago Illinois USA.

Department of Emergency Medicine Stanford University School of Medicine Palo Alto California USA.

出版信息

AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jul 11;7(4):e10891. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10891. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1002/aet2.10891
PMID:37448627
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10336022/
Abstract

Consensus methods such as the Delphi and nominal group techniques are increasingly utilized within medical education research. This educator's blueprint paper provides practical strategies regarding five key steps for ensuring best practices when using consensus methods. These strategies include deciding which consensus method is best, developing the initial questionnaire, identifying the participants, determining the number of rounds and consensus threshold, and describing and justifying any modifications. These strategies will help guide education researchers on their next study using consensus methods.

摘要

德尔菲法和名义群体技术等共识方法在医学教育研究中的应用越来越广泛。这篇教育工作者蓝图论文提供了关于使用共识方法时确保最佳实践的五个关键步骤的实用策略。这些策略包括决定哪种共识方法最佳、制定初始问卷、确定参与者、确定轮次数量和共识阈值,以及描述并说明任何修改。这些策略将有助于指导教育研究人员进行下一项使用共识方法的研究。

相似文献

1
Educator's blueprint: A primer on consensus methods in medical education research.教育者蓝图:医学教育研究中的共识方法入门
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jul 11;7(4):e10891. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10891. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for survey design.教育者蓝图:调查设计操作指南
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Aug 23;6(4):e10796. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10796. eCollection 2022 Aug.
3
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for creating analog serious games for learning in medical education.教育者蓝图:为医学教育中的学习创建模拟严肃游戏的操作指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Nov 29;7(6):e10907. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10907. eCollection 2023 Dec.
4
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for developing high-quality multiple-choice questions.教育者的蓝图:开发高质量多项选择题的操作指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2023 Jan 24;7(1):e10836. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10836. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for creating a high-quality infographic.教育者蓝图:制作高质量信息图表的操作指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2022 Aug 25;6(4):e10793. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10793. eCollection 2022 Aug.
6
Professional development: a guide to the educator's portfolio.专业发展:教育工作者档案指南。
Am J Physiol. 1996 Dec;271(6 Pt 3):S10-3. doi: 10.1152/advances.1996.271.6.S10.
7
A guide to creating an educator's portfolio for the 21st century.21世纪教育工作者作品集创建指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Feb 1;8(1):e10931. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10931. eCollection 2024 Feb.
8
Educator's blueprint: Key considerations for using social media in survey-based medical education research.教育者蓝图:基于调查的医学教育研究中使用社交媒体的关键考量因素
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Sep 23;8(5):e11026. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11026. eCollection 2024 Oct.
9
Educator's blueprint: A how-to guide for creating high-quality slides.教育工作者的蓝图:制作高质量幻灯片的操作指南。
AEM Educ Train. 2024 Sep 1;8(5):e11022. doi: 10.1002/aet2.11022. eCollection 2024 Oct.
10
Identifying educator behaviours for high quality verbal feedback in health professions education: literature review and expert refinement.确定卫生专业教育中高质量口头反馈的教育者行为:文献综述与专家完善
BMC Med Educ. 2016 Mar 22;16:96. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0613-5.

引用本文的文献

1
A community participatory approach to enhancing capacity in patient-centered alcohol research: Bridging translational science and empowering women.一种以社区参与方式增强以患者为中心的酒精研究能力:架起转化科学的桥梁并赋予女性权力。
J Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jul 16;9(1):e165. doi: 10.1017/cts.2025.10102. eCollection 2025.
2
Consensus on the Use of Mefenamic Acid in Pediatric Practice (MAPP): Perspectives From Indian Pediatricians.小儿科使用甲芬那酸的共识(MAPP):印度儿科医生的观点
Cureus. 2025 Jul 21;17(7):e88412. doi: 10.7759/cureus.88412. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Consensus on the definition, components, timeframe and grading of composite outcome of postoperative pulmonary complication-protocol for an international mixed-method consensus study (PrECiSIOn).术后肺部并发症综合结局的定义、组成部分、时间范围和分级的共识——一项国际混合方法共识研究(PrECiSIOn)的方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 19;15(8):e103888. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-103888.
4
In response to Dr. Giusti and Porzio.针对朱斯蒂博士和波尔齐奥博士的回应。
Support Care Cancer. 2025 Jun 24;33(7):619. doi: 10.1007/s00520-025-09683-4.
5
A Practical Guide to Writing Effective Needs Assessments in Graduate Medical Education.研究生医学教育中撰写有效需求评估的实用指南。
J Grad Med Educ. 2025 Jun;17(3):266-270. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-25-00338.1. Epub 2025 Jun 16.
6
Exploring research knowledge and interests among Argentinian orthopedic trauma surgeons: a survey-based study to implement strategic tools for curricular development GAIA (Group for Support of Argentine Research).探索阿根廷骨科创伤外科医生的研究知识和兴趣:一项基于调查的研究,旨在为课程开发实施战略工具——GAIA(阿根廷研究支持小组)。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2025 Jun 17;35(1):250. doi: 10.1007/s00590-025-04386-2.
7
Is physical therapy recommended for people with parkinson's disease treated with subthalamic deep brain stimulation? a delphi consensus study.对于接受丘脑底核深部脑刺激治疗的帕金森病患者,物理治疗是否推荐?一项德尔菲共识研究。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2025 Apr 10;22(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12984-025-01616-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Protocol for an extended scoping review on the use of virtual nominal group technique in research.关于在研究中使用虚拟名义群体技术的扩展范围评价研究方案。
PLoS One. 2023 Jan 20;18(1):e0280764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0280764. eCollection 2023.
2
ACCORD guideline for reporting consensus-based methods in biomedical research and clinical practice: a study protocol.ACCORD生物医学研究和临床实践中基于共识方法报告指南:一项研究方案。
Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022 Jun 7;7(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00122-0.
3
Identifying Social Media Competencies for Health Professionals: An International Modified Delphi Study to Determine Consensus for Curricular Design.确定卫生专业人员的社交媒体能力:一项国际改良德尔菲研究,以确定课程设计的共识。
Ann Emerg Med. 2022 Jun;79(6):560-567. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.02.016. Epub 2022 Mar 24.
4
Faculty Recruitment, Retention, and Representation in Leadership: An Evidence-Based Guide to Best Practices for Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion from the Council of Residency Directors in Emergency Medicine.医学教育领导者人才队伍建设、保留与代表性:住培主任理事会多样性、公平性和包容性实践的循证指南。
West J Emerg Med. 2022 Jan 3;23(1):62-71. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2021.8.53754.
5
A Model Research Curriculum for Emergency Medicine Residency: A Modified Delphi Consensus.急诊医学住院医师培训示范研究课程:改良德尔菲共识法
AEM Educ Train. 2020 Jul 17;5(2):e10484. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10484. eCollection 2021 Apr.
6
Unraveling the effects of cultural diversity in teams: A retrospective of research on multicultural work groups and an agenda for future research.剖析团队中文化多样性的影响:多元文化工作群体研究回顾与未来研究议程
J Int Bus Stud. 2021;52(1):4-22. doi: 10.1057/s41267-020-00389-9. Epub 2021 Jan 18.
7
Core Content for Pediatric Emergency Medicine Ultrasound Fellowship Training: A Modified Delphi Consensus Study.儿科急诊医学超声 fellowship 培训的核心内容:一项改良的德尔菲共识研究。
AEM Educ Train. 2019 Jul 12;4(2):130-138. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10365. eCollection 2020 Apr.
8
The majority of reporting guidelines are not developed with the Delphi method: a systematic review of reporting guidelines.大多数报告指南并非采用德尔菲法制定:报告指南的系统评价。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2020 Aug;124:50-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2020.04.010. Epub 2020 Apr 14.
9
The Delphi Method.德尔菲法。
Acad Med. 2020 Jan;95(1):168. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000002887.
10
Higher number of items associated with significantly lower response rates in COS Delphi surveys.与 COS 德尔菲调查中较低的应答率显著相关的项目数量更多。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2019 Apr;108:110-120. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.12.010. Epub 2018 Dec 15.