• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

互动感知水平对三年级医学生教师评价的影响。

Effect of Perceived Level of Interaction on Faculty Evaluations of 3rd Year Medical Students.

作者信息

Hartman Nicholas D, Manthey David E, Strowd Lindsay C, Potisek Nicholas M, Vallevand Andrea, Tooze Janet, Goforth Jon, McDonough Kimberly, Askew Kim L

机构信息

Wake Forest School of Medicine, Medical Center Boulevard, Winston-Salem, NC 27157 USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Educ. 2021 May 27;31(4):1327-1332. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01307-w. eCollection 2021 Aug.

DOI:10.1007/s40670-021-01307-w
PMID:34457975
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8368453/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Several factors are known to affect the way clinical performance evaluations (CPEs) of medical students are completed by supervising physicians. We sought to explore the effect of faculty perceived "level of interaction" (LOI) on these evaluations.

METHODS

Our third-year CPE requires evaluators to identify perceived LOI with each student as low, moderate, or high. We examined CPEs completed during the academic year 2018-2019 for differences in (1) clinical and professionalism ratings, (2) quality of narrative comments, (3) quantity of narrative comments, and (4) percentage of evaluation questions left unrated.

RESULTS

A total of 3682 CPEs were included in the analysis. ANOVA revealed statistically significant differences between LOI and clinical ratings ( ≤ .001), with mean ratings from faculty with a high LOI significantly higher than from faculty with a moderate or low LOI ( ≤ .001). Chi-squared analysis demonstrated differences based on faculty LOI and whether questions were left unrated ( ≤ .001), quantity of narrative comments ( ≤ .001), and specificity of narrative comments ( ≤ .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Faculty who perceive higher LOI were more likely to assign that student higher ratings, complete more of the clinical evaluation and were more likely to provide narrative feedback with more specific, higher-quality comments.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40670-021-01307-w.

摘要

引言

已知有几个因素会影响指导医师完成医学生临床能力评估(CPE)的方式。我们试图探究教师感知的“互动水平”(LOI)对这些评估的影响。

方法

我们的三年级CPE要求评估者将与每个学生的感知LOI确定为低、中或高。我们检查了2018 - 2019学年完成的CPE,以比较(1)临床和专业素养评分、(2)叙述性评语的质量、(3)叙述性评语的数量以及(4)未评分的评估问题的百分比方面的差异。

结果

分析共纳入3682份CPE。方差分析显示LOI与临床评分之间存在统计学显著差异(≤.001),高LOI教师给出的平均评分显著高于中或低LOI教师给出的评分(≤.001)。卡方分析表明,基于教师的LOI以及问题是否未评分(≤.001)、叙述性评语的数量(≤.001)和叙述性评语的特异性(≤.001)存在差异。

结论

感知到较高LOI的教师更有可能给该学生更高的评分,完成更多的临床评估,并且更有可能提供更具体、质量更高的叙述性反馈。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.100​​7/s40670 - 021 - ​​01307 - w获取的补充材料。

相似文献

1
Effect of Perceived Level of Interaction on Faculty Evaluations of 3rd Year Medical Students.互动感知水平对三年级医学生教师评价的影响。
Med Sci Educ. 2021 May 27;31(4):1327-1332. doi: 10.1007/s40670-021-01307-w. eCollection 2021 Aug.
2
Predictors of faculty narrative evaluation quality in medical school clerkships.医学院实习中教师叙事评估质量的预测因素。
Med Educ. 2022 Dec;56(12):1223-1231. doi: 10.1111/medu.14911. Epub 2022 Aug 23.
3
Milestone Implementation's Impact on Narrative Comments and Perception of Feedback for Internal Medicine Residents: a Mixed Methods Study.里程碑实施对内科住院医师叙事性反馈意见和反馈感知的影响:混合方法研究。
J Gen Intern Med. 2019 Jun;34(6):929-935. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-04946-3.
4
Are online student evaluations of faculty influenced by the timing of evaluations?学生对教师的在线评价是否会受到评价时间的影响?
Adv Physiol Educ. 2010 Dec;34(4):213-6. doi: 10.1152/advan.00079.2010.
5
Education Research: Perspectives and Experiences of Clinical Neurology Faculty Regarding the End-of-Rotation Assessment: A Qualitative Study.教育研究:临床神经学教员对轮转结束评估的看法与经验:一项定性研究
Neurol Educ. 2023 Nov 29;2(4):e200104. doi: 10.1212/NE9.0000000000200104. eCollection 2023 Dec 22.
6
Developing Professionalism via Multisource Feedback in Team-Based Learning.通过团队学习中的多源反馈培养职业素养。
Teach Learn Med. 2015;27(4):362-5. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2015.1077135.
7
Implementation of the mini-CEX to evaluate medical students' clinical skills.实施迷你临床演练评估医学生的临床技能。
Acad Med. 2002 Nov;77(11):1156-7. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200211000-00021.
8
Frequency and determinants of residents' narrative feedback on the teaching performance of faculty: narratives in numbers.住院医师对带教老师教学表现叙事性反馈的频率及其决定因素:数字中的故事。
Acad Med. 2013 Sep;88(9):1324-31. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e31829e3af4.
9
Concordance of Narrative Comments with Supervision Ratings Provided During Entrustable Professional Activity Assessments.叙事性评论与委托专业活动评估中提供的监督评级的一致性。
J Gen Intern Med. 2022 Jul;37(9):2200-2207. doi: 10.1007/s11606-022-07509-1. Epub 2022 Jun 16.
10
Identifying Medical Student Mistreatment in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Clerkship.识别妇产科实习医学生受虐待情况。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Nov-Dec;76(6):1516-1525. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.04.010. Epub 2019 May 28.

本文引用的文献

1
Practical Application of Assessment Principles in the Development of an Innovative Clinical Performance Evaluation in the Entrustable Professional Activity Era.评估原则在可托付专业活动时代创新性临床绩效评估发展中的实际应用
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Nov 18;30(1):499-504. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00841-y. eCollection 2020 Mar.
2
Examining the Effects of Narrative Commentary on Evaluators' Summative Assessments of Resident Performance.考察叙事性评论对评估者对住院医生表现的总结性评估的影响。
Eval Health Prof. 2020 Sep;43(3):159-161. doi: 10.1177/0163278718820415. Epub 2018 Dec 26.
3
Numerical versus narrative: A comparison between methods to measure medical student performance during clinical clerkships.数字与叙述:临床实习期间衡量医学生表现的方法比较
Med Teach. 2017 Nov;39(11):1154-1158. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2017.1368467. Epub 2017 Aug 28.
4
The Hidden Value of Narrative Comments for Assessment: A Quantitative Reliability Analysis of Qualitative Data.叙事性评论在评估中的潜在价值:定性数据的定量可靠性分析
Acad Med. 2017 Nov;92(11):1617-1621. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001669.
5
Faculty development for the evaluation system: a dual agenda.评估系统的教师发展:双重议程。
Adv Med Educ Pract. 2017 Mar 8;8:205-210. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S124004. eCollection 2017.
6
Medical Student Perceptions of Feedback and Feedback Behaviors Within the Context of the "Educational Alliance".医学生对“教育联盟”背景下反馈及反馈行为的认知
Acad Med. 2017 Sep;92(9):1303-1312. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001632.
7
Clinical Performance Evaluations of Third-Year Medical Students and Association With Student and Evaluator Gender.三年级医学生的临床能力评估及其与学生和评估者性别的关联
Acad Med. 2017 Jun;92(6):835-840. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000001565.
8
Applicant characteristics associated with successful matching into otolaryngology.与成功匹配进入耳鼻喉科相关的申请人特征。
Laryngoscope. 2017 May;127(5):1052-1057. doi: 10.1002/lary.26236. Epub 2016 Oct 21.
9
Beyond the Ivory Tower: A Comparison of Grades Across Academic and Community OB/GYN Clerkship Sites.走出象牙塔:学术型与社区型妇产科实习点成绩比较
Teach Learn Med. 2016;28(2):146-51. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2016.1146603.
10
The "educational alliance" as a framework for reconceptualizing feedback in medical education.“教育联盟”作为重新构想医学教育中反馈的框架。
Acad Med. 2015 May;90(5):609-14. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000560.