Tassew Addis Alemayehu, Yadessa Gezahegn Berecha, Bote Adugna Debela, Obso Taye Kufa
Southern Agricultural Research Institute, Bonga Agricultural Research Center, Bonga, Ethiopia.
Department of Horticulture and Plant Sciences, College of Agriculture and Veterinary Medicine, Jimma University, Jimma, Ethiopia.
Heliyon. 2021 Aug 13;7(8):e07790. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07790. eCollection 2021 Aug.
In-depth forest coffee cup quality assessments have not been conducted yet on Kafa Biosphere Reserve coffees. Hence, the influence of location, elevation gradient, and processing methods on coffee bean physical and sensorial qualities, and the relationship between soil and coffee quality variables were studied in 2017. Districts (Gimbo, Gawata, and Decha), elevation gradient ranges (low-<1600, mid-1600-1800, and high->1800 m a.s.l), and processing methods (wet, semi-wet, and dry) were taken as factors. Preliminary coffee quality assessment data was collected from cup quality analysis of coffee beans obtained from the combination of the three factors where four replicate samples were taken for each of the combinations. The effect of location was only significant for bean moisture content and there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference among locations for above 14 screen retention and preliminary cup quality variables (odor, raw, acidity, body, flavor, cup, total, and grade). The elevation gradient had a significant (P < 0.001) effect on the scores of above 14 screen retention and most of the cup quality variables, but not on moisture content and odor. The effect of the coffee processing method was not significant (P > 0.05) on most of the preliminary cup quality variables, but it was significant for moisture content (P < 0.001), odor (P < 0.05), and overall raw (P < 0.01) scores. Screen retention was decreased with increasing elevation gradient but with better quality. High elevation coffees processed with the dry method gave better raw (38.5-40 %) and cup (48.00-51.75 %) quality scores. Except for high soil molybdenum and clay percentage, reduced amounts of most of the soil nutrients, pH, and silt percentage were important for better forest coffee quality. Since each sampled forest had diverse shade types and densities, a further investigation that includes the component of shade is strongly recommended in future studies.
尚未对卡法生物圈保护区的咖啡进行深入的森林咖啡杯品质评估。因此,2017年研究了产地、海拔梯度和加工方法对咖啡豆物理和感官品质的影响,以及土壤与咖啡品质变量之间的关系。选取地区(金博、加瓦塔和德查)、海拔梯度范围(低海拔<1600米、中海拔1600 - 1800米、高海拔>1800米)和加工方法(湿法、半湿法和干法)作为因素。从这三个因素组合得到的咖啡豆杯测品质分析中收集初步咖啡品质评估数据,每个组合取四个重复样本。产地仅对咖啡豆含水量有显著影响,对于14目筛网留存率及初步杯测品质变量(气味、生豆、酸度、醇厚度、风味、杯测总分和等级),不同产地之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。海拔梯度对14目筛网留存率得分及大多数杯测品质变量有显著影响(P<0.001),但对含水量和气味无影响。咖啡加工方法对大多数初步杯测品质变量无显著影响(P>0.05),但对含水量(P<0.001)、气味(P<0.05)和整体生豆得分(P<0.01)有显著影响。筛网留存率随海拔梯度升高而降低,但品质更好。采用干法加工的高海拔咖啡生豆品质得分(38.5 - 40%)和杯测品质得分(48.00 - 51.75%)更高。除了土壤中钼和黏土百分比含量较高外,大多数土壤养分、pH值和粉砂百分比含量降低对森林咖啡品质提升很重要。由于每个采样森林的遮荫类型和密度各不相同,强烈建议在未来研究中进一步开展包括遮荫成分的调查。