• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

术后腹膜炎治疗失败的危险因素:DURAPOP 试验的事后分析。

Risk factors for therapeutic failure in the management of post-operative peritonitis: a post hoc analysis of the DURAPOP trial.

机构信息

Département d'Anesthésie-Réanimation, CHU Bichat-Claude-Bernard, GHU Nord, APHP, Paris, France.

Université de Paris, Paris, France.

出版信息

J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Nov 12;76(12):3303-3309. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab307.

DOI:10.1093/jac/dkab307
PMID:34458922
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8598293/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic failure is a frequent issue in the management of post-operative peritonitis.

OBJECTIVES

A post hoc analysis of the prospective, multicentre DURAPOP trial analysed the risk factors for failures in post-operative peritonitis following adequate source control and empirical antibiotic therapy in critically ill patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Overall failures assessed post-operatively between Day 8 and Day 45 were defined as a composite of death and/or surgical and/or microbiological failures. Risk factors for failures were assessed using logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Among the 236 analysed patients, overall failures were reported in 141 (59.7%) patients, including 30 (12.7%) deaths, 81 (34.3%) surgical and 95 (40.2%) microbiological failures. In the multivariate analysis, the risk factors associated with overall failures were documented piperacillin/tazobactam therapy [adjusted OR (aOR) 2.10; 95% CI 1.17-3.75] and renal replacement therapy on the day of reoperation (aOR 2.96; 95% CI 1.05-8.34). The risk factors for death were age (aOR 1.08 per year; 95% CI 1.03-1.12), renal replacement therapy on reoperation (aOR 3.95; 95% CI 1.36-11.49) and diabetes (OR 6.95; 95% CI 1.34-36.03). The risk factors associated with surgical failure were documented piperacillin/tazobactam therapy (aOR 1.99; 95% CI 1.13-3.51), peritoneal cultures containing Klebsiella spp. (aOR 2.45; 95% CI 1.02-5.88) and pancreatic source of infection (aOR 2.91; 95% CI 1.21-7.01). No specific risk factors were identified for microbiological failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data suggest a predominant role of comorbidities, the severity of post-operative peritonitis and possibly of documented piperacillin/tazobactam treatment on the occurrence of therapeutic failures, regardless of their type.

摘要

背景

治疗失败是术后腹膜炎管理中的常见问题。

目的

对前瞻性、多中心 DURAPOP 试验进行事后分析,分析在充分控制感染源和经验性抗生素治疗的基础上,危重症患者术后腹膜炎治疗失败的危险因素。

患者和方法

术后第 8 天至第 45 天评估的总失败定义为死亡和/或手术和/或微生物学失败的综合指标。使用逻辑回归分析评估失败的危险因素。

结果

在分析的 236 例患者中,141 例(59.7%)患者出现总失败,包括 30 例(12.7%)死亡、81 例(34.3%)手术失败和 95 例(40.2%)微生物学失败。多变量分析显示,与总失败相关的危险因素为有哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗史(调整后的比值比[aOR]2.10;95%可信区间[CI]1.17-3.75)和再手术当天行肾脏替代治疗(aOR 2.96;95%CI 1.05-8.34)。死亡的危险因素为年龄(每年增加 1.08;95%CI 1.03-1.12)、再手术时行肾脏替代治疗(aOR 3.95;95%CI 1.36-11.49)和糖尿病(OR 6.95;95%CI 1.34-36.03)。手术失败的危险因素为有哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗史(aOR 1.99;95%CI 1.13-3.51)、腹膜培养含有克雷伯菌属(aOR 2.45;95%CI 1.02-5.88)和胰腺来源的感染(aOR 2.91;95%CI 1.21-7.01)。未发现微生物学失败的特定危险因素。

结论

无论失败类型如何,本研究数据表明,合并症、术后腹膜炎的严重程度以及可能的哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗史在治疗失败的发生中起主导作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/8598293/ec58d0e7ae9a/dkab307f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/8598293/ec58d0e7ae9a/dkab307f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a865/8598293/ec58d0e7ae9a/dkab307f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Risk factors for therapeutic failure in the management of post-operative peritonitis: a post hoc analysis of the DURAPOP trial.术后腹膜炎治疗失败的危险因素:DURAPOP 试验的事后分析。
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2021 Nov 12;76(12):3303-3309. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkab307.
2
Ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections: results of a double-blind, randomized comparative phase III trial.厄他培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗复杂性腹腔内感染:一项双盲、随机对照III期试验的结果
Ann Surg. 2003 Feb;237(2):235-45. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000048551.32606.73.
3
Prospective randomized comparison of imipenem-cilastatin and piperacillin-tazobactam in nosocomial pneumonia or peritonitis.亚胺培南-西司他丁与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦用于医院获得性肺炎或腹膜炎的前瞻性随机对照研究。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998 Nov;42(11):2966-72. doi: 10.1128/AAC.42.11.2966.
4
Antibiotic Prophylaxis with Piperacillin-Tazobactam Reduces Post-Operative Infectious Complication after Pancreatic Surgery: An Interventional, Non-Randomized Study.哌拉西林他唑巴坦预防性应用降低胰腺手术后术后感染并发症:一项干预性、非随机研究。
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2021 Jun;22(5):536-542. doi: 10.1089/sur.2020.260. Epub 2020 Oct 23.
5
Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与美罗培南对产 ESBLs 的大肠埃希菌或肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染且对头孢曲松耐药患者 30 天死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 11;320(10):984-994. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12163.
6
Is therapeutic drug monitoring really helpful for managing piperacillin/tazobactam therapy in critically ill patients?治疗药物监测对危重症患者哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗的管理真的有帮助吗?
Intensive Care Med. 2022 Nov;48(11):1676-1678. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06830-x. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
7
Efficacy and safety of ertapenem versus piperacillin-tazobactam for the treatment of intra-abdominal infections requiring surgical intervention.厄他培南与哌拉西林-他唑巴坦治疗需要手术干预的腹腔内感染的疗效与安全性比较
J Gastrointest Surg. 2006 Apr;10(4):567-74. doi: 10.1016/j.gassur.2005.06.015.
8
Cost-effectiveness evaluation of ertapenem versus piperacillin/tazobactam in the treatment of complicated intraabdominal infections accounting for antibiotic resistance.厄他培南与哌拉西林/他唑巴坦治疗考虑抗生素耐药的复杂性腹腔内感染的成本-效果评价。
Value Health. 2009 Mar-Apr;12(2):234-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00439.x.
9
Outcomes of treating AmpC-producing Enterobacterales bacteraemia with carbapenems vs. non-carbapenems.碳青霉烯类与非碳青霉烯类治疗产 AmpC 肠杆菌科血流感染的结局比较。
Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2020 Feb;55(2):105860. doi: 10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2019.105860. Epub 2019 Dec 11.
10
Real-World Effectiveness of Piperacillin/Tazobactam with and without Linezolid for Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis.哌拉西林/他唑巴坦联合与不联合利奈唑胺治疗自发性细菌性腹膜炎的真实世界疗效。
Dig Dis. 2022;40(6):777-786. doi: 10.1159/000522259. Epub 2022 Jan 31.

引用本文的文献

1
Literature Review of Prognostic Factors in Secondary Generalized Peritonitis.继发性弥漫性腹膜炎预后因素的文献综述
Life (Basel). 2025 May 29;15(6):880. doi: 10.3390/life15060880.

本文引用的文献

1
Epidemiology of intra-abdominal infection and sepsis in critically ill patients: "AbSeS", a multinational observational cohort study and ESICM Trials Group Project.危重症患者腹腔内感染和脓毒症的流行病学:“AbSeS”,一项多中心观察性队列研究和 ESICM 临床试验组项目。
Intensive Care Med. 2019 Dec;45(12):1703-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00134-019-05819-3. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
2
Microbial findings, sensitivity and outcome in patients with postoperative peritonitis a retrospective cohort study.术后腹膜炎患者的微生物学发现、药敏和结局:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2019 Oct;70:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.08.020. Epub 2019 Aug 19.
3
Epidemiology and outcomes of source control procedures in critically ill patients with intra-abdominal infection.
腹腔感染危重症患者源控制程序的流行病学和结果。
J Crit Care. 2019 Aug;52:258-264. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.02.029. Epub 2019 May 1.
4
Risk factors for mortality and cost implications of complicated intra-abdominal infections in critically ill patients.危重症患者复杂腹腔内感染的死亡风险因素和费用影响。
J Crit Care. 2019 Apr;50:169-176. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.12.001. Epub 2018 Dec 12.
5
Effect of Piperacillin-Tazobactam vs Meropenem on 30-Day Mortality for Patients With E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae Bloodstream Infection and Ceftriaxone Resistance: A Randomized Clinical Trial.哌拉西林-他唑巴坦与美罗培南对产 ESBLs 的大肠埃希菌或肺炎克雷伯菌血流感染且对头孢曲松耐药患者 30 天死亡率的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2018 Sep 11;320(10):984-994. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.12163.
6
Clinical characteristics and prognosis of bacteraemia during postoperative intra-abdominal infections.术后腹腔感染时菌血症的临床特征和预后。
Crit Care. 2018 Jul 7;22(1):175. doi: 10.1186/s13054-018-2099-5.
7
Pneumonia and Renal Replacement Therapy Are Risk Factors for Ceftazidime-Avibactam Treatment Failures and Resistance among Patients with Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections.肺炎和肾脏替代治疗是耐碳青霉烯类肠杆菌科感染患者使用头孢他啶-阿维巴坦治疗失败和耐药的危险因素。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018 Apr 26;62(5). doi: 10.1128/AAC.02497-17. Print 2018 May.
8
Short-course antibiotic therapy for critically ill patients treated for postoperative intra-abdominal infection: the DURAPOP randomised clinical trial.术后腹腔内感染治疗的危重症患者短程抗生素治疗:DURAPOP 随机临床试验。
Intensive Care Med. 2018 Mar;44(3):300-310. doi: 10.1007/s00134-018-5088-x. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: Clinical Effectiveness and Evolution of Resistance.头孢洛扎他唑巴坦治疗多重耐药铜绿假单胞菌感染:临床疗效和耐药演变。
Clin Infect Dis. 2017 Jul 1;65(1):110-120. doi: 10.1093/cid/cix182.
10
Management of intra-abdominal infections: recommendations by the WSES 2016 consensus conference.腹腔内感染的处理:WSES 2016 共识会议的建议。
World J Emerg Surg. 2017 May 4;12:22. doi: 10.1186/s13017-017-0132-7. eCollection 2017.