International Center for Climate and Global Change Research, School of Forestry and Wildlife Sciences, Auburn University, Auburn, AL 36849.
State Key Laboratory of Urban and Regional Ecology, Research Center for Eco-Environmental Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100085, China.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 7;118(36). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015552118.
Global aridification is projected to intensify. Yet, our knowledge of its potential impacts on species ranges remains limited. Here, we investigate global aridity velocity and its overlap with three sectors (natural protected areas, agricultural areas, and urban areas) and terrestrial biodiversity in historical (1979 through 2016) and future periods (2050 through 2099), with and without considering vegetation physiological response to rising CO Both agricultural and urban areas showed a mean drying velocity in history, although the concurrent global aridity velocity was on average +0.05/+0.20 km/yr (no CO effects/with CO effects; "+" denoting wetting). Moreover, in drylands, the shifts of vegetation greenness isolines were found to be significantly coupled with the tracks of aridity velocity. In the future, the aridity velocity in natural protected areas is projected to change from wetting to drying across RCP (representative concentration pathway) 2.6, RCP6.0, and RCP8.5 scenarios. When accounting for spatial distribution of terrestrial taxa (including plants, mammals, birds, and amphibians), the global aridity velocity would be -0.15/-0.02 km/yr ("-" denoting drying; historical), -0.12/-0.15 km/yr (RCP2.6), -0.36/-0.10 km/yr (RCP6.0), and -0.75/-0.29 km/yr (RCP8.5), with amphibians particularly negatively impacted. Under all scenarios, aridity velocity shows much higher multidirectionality than temperature velocity, which is mainly poleward. These results suggest that aridification risks may significantly influence the distribution of terrestrial species besides warming impacts and further impact the effectiveness of current protected areas in future, especially under RCP8.5, which best matches historical CO emissions [C. R. Schwalm , 117, 19656-19657 (2020)].
全球干旱化预计会加剧。然而,我们对于其对物种分布潜在影响的认识仍然有限。在这里,我们研究了历史时期(1979 年至 2016 年)和未来时期(2050 年至 2099 年)的全球干旱化速度及其与三个领域(自然保护区、农业区和城市地区)和陆地生物多样性的重叠情况,同时考虑和不考虑植被对 CO2 上升的生理响应。尽管同期的全球干旱化速度平均为+0.05/+0.20 公里/年(无 CO 影响/有 CO 影响;“+”表示变湿),但农业区和城市区在历史上都显示出平均干燥速度。此外,在干旱地区,植被绿色度等距线的变化被发现与干旱化速度的轨迹显著相关。在未来,自然保护区的干旱化速度预计将在 RCP(代表性浓度路径)2.6、RCP6.0 和 RCP8.5 情景下从变湿转变为变干。当考虑到陆地分类群(包括植物、哺乳动物、鸟类和两栖动物)的空间分布时,全球干旱化速度将在历史时期为-0.15/-0.02 公里/年(“-”表示变干)、-0.12/-0.15 公里/年(RCP2.6)、-0.36/-0.10 公里/年(RCP6.0)和-0.75/-0.29 公里/年(RCP8.5),其中两栖动物受到的影响尤其严重。在所有情景下,干旱化速度的多方向性都远高于温度速度,后者主要是向极地方向。这些结果表明,除了变暖影响之外,干旱化风险可能会显著影响陆地物种的分布,并进一步影响未来现有保护区的有效性,尤其是在 RCP8.5 情景下,该情景最符合历史时期的 CO2 排放[C. R. Schwalm 等人,《科学》117,19656-19657(2020)]。