• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

《精神体验的社区评估:检测精神病患者的最佳截断分数》。

The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences: Optimal cut-off scores for detecting individuals with a psychotic disorder.

机构信息

Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia.

Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Institute of Psychology, Universität Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec;30(4):e1893. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1893. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.1893
PMID:34464487
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8633944/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The need for a brief screening tool for psychosis is widely recognized. The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) is a popular self-report measure of psychosis, but a cut-off score that can detect those most likely to fulfill diagnostic criteria for psychotic disorder is not established.

METHODS

A case-control sample from the Genetic Risk and Outcome of Psychosis Project study (N = 1375, healthy individuals, n = 507, and individuals with a psychotic disorder, n = 868), was used to examine cut-off scores of the CAPE with receiver operating curve analyses. We examined 27 possible cut-off scores computed from a combination of scores from the frequency and distress scales of the various factors of the CAPE.

RESULTS

The weighted severity positive symptom dimension was most optimal in detecting individuals with a psychotic disorder (>1.75 cut-off; area under the curve = 0.88; sensitivity, 75%; specificity, 88%), which correctly identified 80% of the sample as cases or controls with a diagnostic odds ratio of 22.69.

CONCLUSIONS

The CAPE can be used as a first screening tool to detect individuals who are likely to fulfill criteria for a psychotic disorder. The >1.75 cut-off of the weighted severity positive symptom dimension provides a better prediction than all alternatives tested so far.

摘要

目的

广泛认识到需要一种简短的精神病筛查工具。精神体验社区评估量表(CAPE)是一种常用的精神病自我报告测量工具,但尚未确定能够检测出最有可能符合精神病障碍诊断标准的截断分数。

方法

使用来自精神病风险和结局研究项目(N=1375,健康个体,n=507,以及精神病个体,n=868)的病例对照样本,通过接受者操作特征曲线分析来检查 CAPE 的截断分数。我们检验了 CAPE 的频率和困扰量表的各个因子的分数组合得出的 27 个可能的截断分数。

结果

加权严重阳性症状维度在检测精神病个体方面最具优势(>1.75 截断值;曲线下面积=0.88;敏感性为 75%,特异性为 88%),正确识别了 80%的样本为病例或对照,诊断比值比为 22.69。

结论

CAPE 可用作首次筛查工具,以检测可能符合精神病障碍标准的个体。加权严重阳性症状维度的>1.75 截断值比迄今为止测试的所有其他替代方案提供了更好的预测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c04/8633944/a810419e20b5/MPR-30-e1893-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c04/8633944/a810419e20b5/MPR-30-e1893-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9c04/8633944/a810419e20b5/MPR-30-e1893-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
The Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences: Optimal cut-off scores for detecting individuals with a psychotic disorder.《精神体验的社区评估:检测精神病患者的最佳截断分数》。
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2021 Dec;30(4):e1893. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1893. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
2
The Community Assessment of Psychic Experience (CAPE) questionnaire as a screening-instrument in the detection of individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis.《精神体验社区评估量表》(CAPE)作为一种筛查工具,用于检测处于精神病超高风险的个体。
Schizophr Res. 2012 Nov;141(2-3):210-4. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2012.08.008. Epub 2012 Sep 15.
3
Validation of the Chinese version of Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE) in an adolescent general population.社区心理体验评估量表(CAPE)中文版在青少年一般人群中的验证。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2017 Apr;26:58-65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2017.01.012. Epub 2017 Jan 20.
4
Usefulness of the CAPE-P15 for detecting people at ultra-high risk for psychosis: Psychometric properties and cut-off values.CAPE-P15 用于检测极可能发展为精神病的个体的效用:心理测量学特性和截断值。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Nov;189:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
5
Improving detection of first-episode psychosis by mental health-care services using a self-report questionnaire.利用自报问卷提高精神卫生服务机构对首发精神病的检出率。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2009 Nov;3(4):289-95. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-7893.2009.00147.x.
6
Revisiting CAPE-P15 cut-off values to increase sensitivity for detecting psychotic experiences in primary care.重新审视 CAPE-P15 截断值以提高初级保健中心检测精神病性体验的敏感性。
Schizophr Res. 2020 Feb;216:507-510. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2019.11.051. Epub 2019 Dec 5.
7
Comparisons between self-reported and interview-verified psychotic-like experiences in adolescents.青少年自我报告和访谈验证的类精神病体验比较。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2022 Jan;16(1):69-77. doi: 10.1111/eip.13132. Epub 2021 Feb 16.
8
Cultural differences in positive psychotic experiences assessed with the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences-42 (CAPE-42): a comparison of student populations in the Netherlands, Nigeria and Norway.使用 42 项社区心理体验量表(CAPE-42)评估阳性心理体验的文化差异:荷兰、尼日利亚和挪威学生群体的比较。
BMC Psychiatry. 2019 Aug 6;19(1):244. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2210-8.
9
Is it still correct to differentiate between early and very early onset psychosis?区分早发性和极早发性精神病仍然正确吗?
Schizophr Res. 2016 Jan;170(1):211-6. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2015.11.020. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
10
Diagnostic Accuracy of the CASI-4R Psychosis Subscale for Children Evaluated in Pediatric Outpatient Clinics.儿科门诊评估的儿童简易精神状态检查-4R 精神病亚量表的诊断准确性。
J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol. 2019 Jul-Aug;48(4):610-621. doi: 10.1080/15374416.2017.1410824. Epub 2018 Jan 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Interpersonal emotion regulation and symptom dimensions of psychosis proneness in young adults.年轻人的人际情绪调节与精神病易感性的症状维度
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Nov 1;10(1):100. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00520-x.
2
Psychological and social difficulties in young non-help-seeking adolescents at risk for psychosis: insights from a large cohort study.有精神病风险的未寻求帮助的青少年的心理和社会困难:一项大型队列研究的见解
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 17;15:1430805. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1430805. eCollection 2024.
3
Individual differences in belief updating and phasic arousal are related to psychosis proneness.

本文引用的文献

1
The Independent Effects of Psychosocial Stressors on Subclinical Psychosis: Findings From the Multinational EU-GEI Study.心理社会压力源对亚临床精神病的独立影响:来自多国 EU-GEI 研究的结果。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Oct 21;47(6):1674-1684. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbab060.
2
Religiosity and prevalence of suicide, psychiatric disorders and psychotic symptoms in the French general population.宗教信仰与法国普通人群中自杀、精神障碍和精神病症状的流行情况。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2021 Dec;271(8):1547-1557. doi: 10.1007/s00406-021-01233-3. Epub 2021 Feb 10.
3
Comorbid Major Depressive Disorder in Schizophrenia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
信念更新和阶段性唤醒方面的个体差异与精神病易感性有关。
Commun Psychol. 2024 Sep 23;2(1):88. doi: 10.1038/s44271-024-00140-2.
4
Psychotic-like experiences and associated factors in resident physicians: A Canadian cross-sectional study.住院医师的类精神病体验及相关因素:一项加拿大横断面研究。
Early Interv Psychiatry. 2025 Jan;19(1):e13564. doi: 10.1111/eip.13564. Epub 2024 May 20.
5
The effects of assessing character strengths vs. psychopathology on mood, hope, perceived stigma and cognitive performance in individuals with psychosis.评估性格优势与精神病理学对精神病患者情绪、希望、感知耻辱感和认知表现的影响。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 10;18(8):e0289872. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289872. eCollection 2023.
6
Associations between digital media use and psychotic experiences in young adults of Quebec, Canada: a longitudinal study.加拿大魁北克省青年成人数字媒体使用与精神病体验之间的关联:一项纵向研究。
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2024 Jan;59(1):65-75. doi: 10.1007/s00127-023-02537-6. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
7
Psychometric Properties and Diagnostic Associations of the Short-Form Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences in a Population-Based Sample of 29 021 Adult Men.在一个基于 29021 名成年男性的人口样本中,短式社区心理体验评估的心理计量特性和诊断关联性。
Schizophr Bull. 2023 Sep 7;49(5):1229-1238. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbad074.
8
Cognitive functioning in a group of adolescents at risk for psychosis.一组有精神病风险的青少年的认知功能
Front Psychiatry. 2022 Dec 1;13:1075222. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.1075222. eCollection 2022.
9
Expanding the positivity offset theory of anhedonia to the psychosis continuum.将快感缺失的积极性偏移理论扩展至精神病连续体。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2022 May 3;8(1):47. doi: 10.1038/s41537-022-00251-x.
精神分裂症共病重性抑郁障碍:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2021 Mar 16;47(2):298-308. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sbaa153.
4
Comparing psychotic experiences in low-and-middle-income-countries and high-income-countries with a focus on measurement invariance.比较中低收入国家和高收入国家的精神病体验,重点是测量不变性。
Psychol Med. 2022 Jun;52(8):1509-1516. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720003323. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
5
Assessing cross-national invariance of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).评估心理体验社区评估量表(CAPE)在跨国间的不变性。
Psychol Med. 2019 Nov;49(15):2600-2607. doi: 10.1017/S0033291718003574. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
6
Cross-Validation Approaches for Replicability in Psychology.心理学中可重复性的交叉验证方法。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 2;9:1117. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01117. eCollection 2018.
7
Psychotic Experiences and Related Distress: A Cross-national Comparison and Network Analysis Based on 7141 Participants From 13 Countries.精神病性体验及相关痛苦:基于 13 个国家 7141 名参与者的跨国比较和网络分析。
Schizophr Bull. 2018 Oct 17;44(6):1185-1194. doi: 10.1093/schbul/sby087.
8
Psychotic experiences and religiosity: Findings from the collaborative psychiatric epidemiological surveys.精神病体验与宗教信仰:协作性精神疾病流行病学调查结果
Schizophr Res. 2018 Nov;201:435-436. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2018.05.037. Epub 2018 Jun 5.
9
A longitudinal mediation analysis of the effect of negative-self-schemas on positive symptoms via negative affect.纵向中介分析表明,消极自我图式通过消极情绪对阳性症状产生影响。
Psychol Med. 2018 Jun;48(8):1299-1307. doi: 10.1017/S003329171700277X. Epub 2017 Sep 28.
10
Usefulness of the CAPE-P15 for detecting people at ultra-high risk for psychosis: Psychometric properties and cut-off values.CAPE-P15 用于检测极可能发展为精神病的个体的效用:心理测量学特性和截断值。
Schizophr Res. 2017 Nov;189:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.schres.2017.02.017. Epub 2017 Feb 27.