Department of Prosthodontics, School and Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University.
Department of Prosthodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University.
Dent Mater J. 2022 Feb 1;41(1):1-10. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2021-111. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
This review aims to evaluate whether the etch-and-rinse or self-etch mode is the better protocol for dentin adhesion by universal adhesives. A total of 15 articles were included in the meta-analysis. Two reviewers performed a literature search up to October 2020in four databases: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Without considering the difference in aging mode, the analysis of the immediate and long-term bond strength of dentin showed that there was no statistical significance between the etch-and-rinse and self-etch mode of universal adhesive, and the long-term bond strength decreased relative to the immediate. In vitro studies suggest that prior acid etching did not improve bond performance. Whether from the perspective of long-term bonding performance or simplifying operating procedures, the self-etch mode is preferred.
本综述旨在评估通用粘结剂的酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀模式在牙本质粘结中的优劣。共有 15 篇文献纳入荟萃分析。两位评价者于 2020 年 10 月前在四个数据库（PubMed、Web of Science、Embase 和 Cochrane Library）中进行了文献检索。不考虑老化模式的差异，对通用粘结剂即刻和长期粘结强度的分析表明，酸蚀-冲洗和自酸蚀模式之间没有统计学意义，长期粘结强度相对于即刻粘结强度有所下降。体外研究表明，预先酸蚀并不能提高粘结性能。无论从长期粘结性能还是简化操作程序的角度来看，自酸蚀模式都是首选。
