Shafiei Fereshteh, Dehghanian Paria, Tivay Shadi, Ghahramani Yasamin
Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Oral and Dental Disease Research Center, Department of Operative Dentistry, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Int J Dent. 2024 Oct 22;2024:6645237. doi: 10.1155/2024/6645237. eCollection 2024.
The cervical resorption following intracoronal bleaching necessitates the application of impermeable cervical barriers. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of two bleaching agents on the compressive strength (CS) and shear bond strength (SBS) of two self-adhesive resins, TheraCem and Vertise Flow, to composite resin restorative material. Two hundred sixteen specimens from TheraCem and Vertise Flow were prepared in special molds and treated in three groups: nonbleached (control); sodium perborate-hydrogen peroxide (SP-HP) (sodium perborate +3% hydrogen peroxide); and HP gel (35% hydrogen peroxide gel). The CS of 72 specimens in the three groups was tested using a universal testing machine. For SBS test, 144 specimens from TheraCem and Vertise Flow in the three groups were bonded to Z250 composite using Single Bond Universal adhesive in self-etch and etch-and-rinse modes. SBS was measured using universal testing machine. Data were analyzed using two-way ANOVA and Tukey tests for CS and three-way ANOVA and Tukey tests for SBS. Vertise Flow showed higher CS than TheraCem ( < 0.001), while none of the bleaching agents deteriorated its CS. HP gel significantly lowered the CS of TheraCem ( = 0.001). Bleaching agents increased the SBS of Vertise Flow while the SBS of TheraCem was not significantly affected. For both resin barriers, SBS was higher in the etch-and-rinse mode ( < 0.05), except in nonbleached Vertise Flow ( = 0.091). HP gel deleteriously affected the CS of only TheraCem during nonvital bleaching. The etch-and-rinse mode was preferred in terms of SBS for resin barriers.
冠内漂白后的颈部吸收需要使用不可渗透的颈部屏障。本研究旨在评估两种漂白剂对两种自粘树脂TheraCem和Vertise Flow与复合树脂修复材料的抗压强度(CS)和剪切粘结强度(SBS)的影响。从TheraCem和Vertise Flow制备了216个标本,置于特殊模具中,并分为三组进行处理:未漂白(对照组);过硼酸钠-过氧化氢(SP-HP)(过硼酸钠+3%过氧化氢);以及HP凝胶(35%过氧化氢凝胶)。使用万能试验机测试三组中72个标本的CS。对于SBS测试,将三组中来自TheraCem和Vertise Flow的144个标本使用单键通用粘合剂以自酸蚀和酸蚀冲洗模式粘结到Z250复合材料上。使用万能试验机测量SBS。使用双向方差分析和Tukey检验分析CS数据,使用三向方差分析和Tukey检验分析SBS数据。Vertise Flow的CS高于TheraCem(<0.001),而没有一种漂白剂使其CS降低。HP凝胶显著降低了TheraCem的CS(=0.001)。漂白剂增加了Vertise Flow的SBS,而TheraCem的SBS未受到显著影响。对于两种树脂屏障,除了未漂白的Vertise Flow(=0.091)外,酸蚀冲洗模式下的SBS更高(<0.05)。在非活髓漂白过程中,HP凝胶仅对TheraCem的CS有有害影响。就树脂屏障的SBS而言,酸蚀冲洗模式更受青睐。