Suppr超能文献

胃癌新辅助化疗候选者的放射学标准:来自 PRODIGY 研究的探索性分析。

Radiological criteria for selecting candidates for neoadjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer: an exploratory analysis from the PRODIGY study.

机构信息

Department of Oncology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05505, Republic of Korea.

Department of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Gastric Cancer. 2022 Jan;25(1):170-179. doi: 10.1007/s10120-021-01243-z. Epub 2021 Sep 2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

In this exploratory analysis from the PRODIGY study, we aimed to define the radiological criteria to identify patients with gastric cancer who may derive maximal clinical benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

There were 246 patients allocated to receive surgery followed by adjuvant S-1 (SC group) and 238 allocated to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CSC group). As the PRODIGY's radiological method of lymph node (LN) evaluation considers short diameter and morphology (the size and morphology method), a method considering only short diameter was also employed. In the SC group, the correlation between radiologic and pathologic findings was analyzed. The hazard ratio (HR) for the progression-free survival (PFS) of the CSC group was analyzed in subgroups with different cT/N stages.

RESULTS

cT4 disease showed a sensitivity of 85.6% for detecting pT4 and had a low proportion of pathologic stage (pStage) I disease (4.5%). Among the criteria determined by different cT/N stages by each method of LN positivity, those involving cT4Nany or cT4N + by both methods had a minimal proportion of pStage I disease (≤ 5%), while cT4Nany by both methods and cT4N + by the size and morphology method exhibited ≥ 75.9% sensitivity for detecting pStage III disease. The relative risk reduction in PFS of the CSC group was greatest in patients meeting the cT4Nany criterion defined by both methods (HR 0.67, 95% confidence interval 0.48-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

The cT4Nany criterion, regardless of the radiological method used for LN evaluation, may help select patients with resectable gastric cancer for neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

摘要

背景

在 PRODIGY 研究的这项探索性分析中,我们旨在定义放射学标准,以确定可能从新辅助化疗中获得最大临床获益的胃癌患者。

患者和方法

246 例患者被分配接受手术加辅助 S-1(SC 组),238 例患者被分配接受新辅助化疗(CSC 组)。由于 PRODIGY 的淋巴结(LN)评估放射学方法考虑短径和形态(大小和形态方法),还采用了仅考虑短径的方法。在 SC 组中,分析了影像学和病理发现之间的相关性。分析了 CSC 组不同 cT/N 分期亚组的无进展生存期(PFS)的风险比(HR)。

结果

cT4 疾病对检测 pT4 的敏感性为 85.6%,且病理分期(pStage)I 疾病的比例较低(4.5%)。在每种 LN 阳性方法确定的不同 cT/N 分期标准中,涉及 cT4Nany 或两种方法均为 cT4N+的标准,pStage I 疾病的比例最低(≤5%),而两种方法均为 cT4Nany 和大小和形态方法均为 cT4N+的标准,检测 pStage III 疾病的敏感性≥75.9%。符合两种方法定义的 cT4Nany 标准的患者,CSC 组的 PFS 相对风险降低最大(HR 0.67,95%置信区间 0.48-0.93)。

结论

无论用于 LN 评估的放射学方法如何,cT4Nany 标准都可能有助于选择可切除胃癌患者进行新辅助化疗。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验