School of Postgraduate Studies and Research, International Medical University, 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
School of Postgraduate Studies and Research, International Medical University, 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia; Centre for Bioactive Molecules & Drug Delivery, Institute for Research, Development and Innovation, International Medical University, 126, Jalan Jalil Perkasa 19, Bukit Jalil, 57000 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Fitoterapia. 2021 Oct;154:105026. doi: 10.1016/j.fitote.2021.105026. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
Wounds still pose a huge burden on human health and healthcare systems in many parts of the world. Phytomedicines are being used to heal the wounds since ancient times. Now-a-days also many researchers are exploring the wound healing activity of phytomedicines. Wound healing is a complex process thus, it is always a question mark regarding the best test model (in vivo, ex vivo and in vitro) model to assess the wound healing activity of phytomedicines. In general, the researchers would opt for in vivo model - probably because of closer physiological relevance to human wounds. However, in vivo experimental models are not suitable for high throughput screening and not ethical in terms of initial screening of the phytomedicines. The in vivo models are associated with difficulties in obtaining the ethical approvals, requires huge budget, and resources. We argue that judicious selection of cell types would serve the purpose of developing a physiologically relevant in vitro experimental model. A lot of progress has been made in molecular biology techniques to bridge the gap between in vitro models and their physiological relevance. The in vitro models are the best suited for high throughput screening and to elucidate the molecular mechanisms. The main aim of this review is to provide insights on selection of the cell types for developing physiologically relevant in vitro wound healing assays, which can be used to improve the value of phytomedicines further.
伤口在世界许多地区仍然给人类健康和医疗保健系统带来巨大负担。自古以来,植物药就被用于治疗伤口。如今,许多研究人员也在探索植物药的伤口愈合活性。伤口愈合是一个复杂的过程,因此,选择哪种最佳测试模型(体内、体外和离体)来评估植物药的伤口愈合活性一直是一个未知数。一般来说,研究人员会选择体内模型——可能是因为它与人类伤口更接近生理相关性。然而,体内实验模型不适合高通量筛选,而且从植物药的初步筛选来看不道德。体内模型在获得伦理批准方面存在困难,需要大量的预算和资源。我们认为,明智地选择细胞类型将有助于开发出更具生理相关性的体外实验模型。分子生物学技术在弥合体外模型与其生理相关性方面取得了很大进展。体外模型最适合高通量筛选和阐明分子机制。本文的主要目的是提供有关选择细胞类型来开发更具生理相关性的体外伤口愈合测定的见解,这可以进一步提高植物药的价值。