Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Drs Clapp, James, and Kaimal); Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Drs Clapp, Little, Robinson, and Kaimal); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Little); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA (Dr Robinson).
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA (Drs Clapp, James, and Kaimal); Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Drs Clapp, Little, Robinson, and Kaimal); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr Little); Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Newton, MA (Dr Robinson).
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM. 2021 Nov;3(6):100474. doi: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2021.100474. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
Although there are many indications for a cesarean delivery, the "optimal" cesarean delivery rate is unknown. Neonatal and maternal morbidity have largely not been considered in the generation of hospital-level cesarean delivery rate targets.
We sought to examine if the widely adopted and reported markers of maternal and neonatal morbidity were associated with hospital cesarean delivery rates to provide context for potential comparison and consideration for defining cesarean delivery rate targets. We hypothesized that hospitals with higher cesarean delivery rates would have increased rates of severe maternal morbidity, though we were less certain of the associations of the cesarean delivery rates with unexpected newborn complications.
This is a cross-sectional, ecological study using data from the 2016 Nationwide Readmission Database of hospitals with at least 100 deliveries per year. The exposure of interest was hospital cesarean delivery rate. The outcomes were (1) severe maternal morbidity with and without transfusion-in accordance with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's definition, and (2) neonatal morbidity-defined using The Joint Commission's Perinatal Quality metric of moderate and severe unexpected newborn complications among term, singleton, and nonanomalous neonates. Before assuming a single linear relationship to model the associations between morbidity and cesarean delivery rates, the Joinpoint Regression Analysis program was used to examine for potential splines in the relationships with both severe maternal morbidity (with and without transfusion) and severe and moderate unexpected newborn complications. Poisson regression model was then used to determine the association between morbidity and cesarean delivery rates.
The analysis included 831,111 deliveries from 621 hospitals. The mean cesarean delivery rate was 30.5%. The median severe maternal morbidity rate was 1.40 per 100 deliveries (interquartile range, 0.71-2.21 per 1000 deliveries). Excluding transfusion, the median severe maternal morbidity rate was 0.47 per 100 deliveries (interquartile range, 0.22-0.73 per 100 deliveries). The median rate of severe and moderate unexpected newborn complications was 1.01 per 100 low-risk newborns (interquartile range, 0.64-1.69 per 100 low-risk newborns) and 1.79 per 1000 low-risk newborns (interquartile range, 0.94-2.93 per 100 low-risk newborns), respectively. In the unadjusted analysis, every percentage point increase in a hospital's cesarean delivery rate was associated with a 3.4% (95% confidence interval, 2.3%-4.4%) and a 2.3% (95% confidence interval, 1.0%-3.5%) increase in severe maternal morbidity including and excluding transfusion, respectively. After adjustment for the case mix and hospital factors, only the relationship with severe maternal morbidity including transfusion remained significant: 3.3% (95% confidence interval, 1.7%-4.9%) increase in severe maternal morbidity per 1 percentage point increase in the cesarean delivery rate. There was no observed association between cesarean delivery rates and unexpected newborn complications CONCLUSION: Severe maternal morbidity and unexpected newborn complications occur in fewer than 5 in 100 births. Findings from this analysis of hospitals with cesarean delivery rates ranging from 6.8%-56.3% suggest that those with lower cesarean delivery rates have lower severe maternal morbidity (which includes transfusion) and similar unexpected newborn complications compared with hospitals with higher cesarean delivery rates. This work may provide a helpful context to providers, hospitals, and policymakers who are measuring and reporting outcomes. Regarding neonatal morbidity in particular, the Joint Commission manual notes that the unexpected newborn complication metric was specifically designed to be compared against maternal-focused metrics such as cesarean delivery rates. More work is needed to define and identify appropriate measures of maternal and neonatal morbidity for these types of comparisons.
尽管有许多剖宫产的指征,但“最佳”剖宫产率是未知的。在制定医院剖宫产率目标时,新生儿和产妇发病率在很大程度上没有被考虑在内。
我们试图研究广泛采用和报告的产妇和新生儿发病率标志物是否与医院剖宫产率相关,为潜在的比较和定义剖宫产率目标提供背景。我们假设剖宫产率较高的医院严重产妇发病率较高,但我们对剖宫产率与意外新生儿并发症的关联不太确定。
这是一项横断面、生态学研究,使用了 2016 年全国再入院数据库中每年至少有 100 次分娩的医院的数据。感兴趣的暴露是医院剖宫产率。结果是(1)根据疾病控制和预防中心的定义,严重产妇发病率(包括和不包括输血)和(2)新生儿发病率-使用联合委员会的围产期质量指标,定义为足月、单胎和非异常新生儿的中度和重度意外新生儿并发症。在假设与剖宫产率之间存在单一线性关系之前,使用 Joinpoint 回归分析程序检查严重产妇发病率(包括和不包括输血)和严重和中度意外新生儿并发症之间的潜在样条关系。然后使用泊松回归模型确定发病率与剖宫产率之间的关联。
分析包括来自 621 家医院的 831111 次分娩。剖宫产率平均为 30.5%。中位数严重产妇发病率为每 100 次分娩 1.40 例(四分位间距,每 1000 次分娩 0.71-2.21 例)。不包括输血,中位数严重产妇发病率为每 100 次分娩 0.47 例(四分位间距,每 1000 次分娩 0.22-0.73 例)。严重和中度意外新生儿并发症的中位数发生率分别为每 100 例低危新生儿 1.01 例(四分位间距,每 100 例低危新生儿 0.64-1.69 例)和每 1000 例低危新生儿 1.79 例(四分位间距,每 100 例低危新生儿 0.94-2.93 例)。在未调整分析中,医院剖宫产率每增加一个百分点,严重产妇发病率包括和不包括输血在内,分别增加 3.4%(95%置信区间,2.3%-4.4%)和 2.3%(95%置信区间,1.0%-3.5%)。在调整病例组合和医院因素后,只有包括输血的严重产妇发病率与剖宫产率的关系仍然显著:剖宫产率每增加 1 个百分点,严重产妇发病率增加 3.3%(95%置信区间,1.7%-4.9%)。未发现剖宫产率与意外新生儿并发症之间存在关联。
严重产妇发病率和意外新生儿并发症在不到 100 次分娩中发生不到 5 次。这项对剖宫产率在 6.8%-56.3%之间的医院的分析结果表明,与剖宫产率较高的医院相比,剖宫产率较低的医院严重产妇发病率(包括输血)较低,意外新生儿并发症相似。这项工作可能为衡量和报告结果的提供者、医院和政策制定者提供有用的背景。特别是关于新生儿发病率,联合委员会手册指出,意外新生儿并发症指标是专门设计来与剖宫产率等以产妇为重点的指标进行比较的。需要做更多的工作来定义和确定这些类型比较的适当产妇和新生儿发病率指标。