School of Nursing, Faculty of Science, Medicine & Health, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute (IHMRI), Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Worldviews Evid Based Nurs. 2021 Oct;18(5):290-301. doi: 10.1111/wvn.12536. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
Postoperative delirium is the most common complication of surgery particularly in older patients.
The current study aimed to summarize the commonly used delirium assessment tools in assessing postoperative delirium (POD) and to estimate the incidence rates of POD.
A systematic review that included empirical cohort studies reporting the use of delirium assessment tools in assessing POD between 2000 and 2019. Five core databases were searched for eligible studies. The methodological quality assessment of the included studies was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) critical appraisal checklist to examine the risk of bias. Pooled incidence estimates were calculated using a random effects model.
Nineteen studies with a total of 3,533 postsurgery older patients were included in this review. The confusion assessment method (CAM) and CAM-ICU were the most commonly used tools to assess POD among older postoperative patients. The pooled incidence rate of POD was 24% (95% CI [0.20, 0.29]). The pooled incidence estimates for mixed (noncardiac) surgery, orthopedic surgery, and tumor surgery were 23% (95% CI [0.15, 0.31]), 27% (95% CI [0.20, 0.33]), and 19% (95% CI [0.15, 0.22]), respectively. More than 50% of included studies used CAM to assess POD in different types of postoperative patients. Using CAM to assess delirium is less time-consuming and it was suggested as the most efficient tool for POD detection.
We identified that CAM could be implemented in different settings for assessing POD. The incidence and risk factors for POD introduced can be used for future research to target these potential indicators. The incidence rate, risk factors, and predictors of POD explored can provide robust evidence for clinical practitioners in their daily practice.
术后谵妄是手术最常见的并发症,尤其是在老年患者中。
本研究旨在总结目前用于评估术后谵妄(POD)的常用谵妄评估工具,并估计 POD 的发生率。
系统回顾了 2000 年至 2019 年期间报告使用谵妄评估工具评估 POD 的经验队列研究。对 5 个核心数据库进行了检索以获取符合条件的研究。使用 Joanna Briggs 研究所(JBI)的批判性评估清单对纳入研究的方法学质量进行评估,以检查偏倚风险。使用随机效应模型计算汇总发生率估计值。
本综述纳入了 19 项研究,共 3533 名老年术后患者。在老年术后患者中,最常用的评估 POD 的工具是意识模糊评估法(CAM)和 CAM-ICU。POD 的汇总发生率为 24%(95%CI[0.20,0.29])。混合(非心脏)手术、骨科手术和肿瘤手术的汇总发生率分别为 23%(95%CI[0.15,0.31])、27%(95%CI[0.20,0.33])和 19%(95%CI[0.15,0.22])。超过 50%的纳入研究使用 CAM 评估不同类型术后患者的 POD。使用 CAM 评估谵妄耗时更少,被认为是检测 POD 最有效的工具。
我们发现 CAM 可用于不同环境下评估 POD。POD 的发生率和风险因素可用于未来的研究,以针对这些潜在指标。POD 的发生率、风险因素和预测因素的研究可为临床医生的日常实践提供有力的证据。