Center for Education and Training, Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Center for Education and Training, Department of Surgery, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Surgeon. 2022 Oct;20(5):e195-e205. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2021.08.001. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
Rapid development of COVID-19 has resulted in a massive shift from traditional to online teaching. This review aims to evaluate the effectiveness of distance learning on anatomy and surgical training. This systematic review was conducted in line with the PRISMA statement and current methodological literature. The databases CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE and Pubmed were searched using the search terms "Distant learning" OR "Distance learning" AND "Anatomy OR Surgery". 182 non-duplicate studies were identified. 20 studies were included for qualitative analysis. 10 studies evaluated students' performance with distance learning. 3 studies suggested that students' learning motivation improved with distance learning pedagogy. 5 studies found improved student performance with distance learning (performance or task completion time) when compared to conventional physical method. While 2 other studies found non-inferior student performance. 10 studies evaluated students' feedback on distance learning. Most feedbacks were positive, with flexibility, efficiency, increased motivation and better viewing angles as the most-liked features of distance teaching. 4 studies pointed out some limitations of distance learning, including the lack of personal contact with tutor, poor network and reduced student concentration. 7 studies evaluated tutors' feedback on distance learning. Tutors generally liked online platforms for the ease of tracking silent students, monitoring performance and updating fast-changing knowledge. Yet the lack of hands-on experience for students, technical issues and high costs are the main concerns for tutors. In conclusion, distance learning is a feasible alternative for anatomy and surgical teaching.
COVID-19 的快速发展导致传统教学向在线教学大规模转移。本综述旨在评估远程学习在解剖学和外科培训中的效果。本系统评价符合 PRISMA 声明和当前方法学文献。使用“远程学习”或“Distance learning”和“解剖学或外科学”的检索词,在 CINAHL、Cochrane、EMBASE 和 Pubmed 数据库中进行检索,共确定了 182 篇非重复研究。纳入 20 项研究进行定性分析。10 项研究评估了学生远程学习的表现。3 项研究表明,远程学习教学法提高了学生的学习动机。5 项研究发现,与传统的实体方法相比,远程学习提高了学生的表现(表现或任务完成时间)。而另外两项研究发现学生的表现无差异。10 项研究评估了学生对远程学习的反馈。大多数反馈是积极的,灵活性、效率、提高的动机和更好的视角是远程教学最受欢迎的特点。4 项研究指出了远程学习的一些局限性,包括缺乏与导师的个人接触、网络不佳和学生注意力降低。7 项研究评估了导师对远程学习的反馈。导师普遍喜欢在线平台,因为可以方便地跟踪沉默的学生、监测表现和更新快速变化的知识。然而,学生缺乏实践经验、技术问题和高成本是导师关注的主要问题。总之,远程学习是解剖学和外科学教学的一种可行替代方法。