• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[COVID-19疫苗接种的统计素养与风险沟通:一项范围综述 关于COVID-19疫苗接种的统计素养与风险沟通:范围综述]

[Statistical literacy and risk communication for COVID-19 vaccination: a scoping reviewLiteracia estatística e comunicação de risco para a vacinação contra a COVID-19: revisão de escopo].

作者信息

Palmeiro-Silva Yasna K, Weinstein-Oppenheimer Caroline, Henríquez-Roldán Carlos Felipe, Bangdiwala Shrikant I

机构信息

Institute for Global Health, University College London Londres Reino Unido Institute for Global Health, University College London, Londres, Reino Unido.

Centro de Investigación Farmacopea Chilena (CIFAR), Universidad de Valparaíso Valparaíso Chile Centro de Investigación Farmacopea Chilena (CIFAR), Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso, Chile.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Aug 31;45:e108. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.108. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2021.108
PMID:34484314
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8407599/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the role of statistical literacy and proper risk communication in communication strategies related to COVID-19 vaccination.

METHODS

A scoping review was carried out in January 2021, with the keywords "statistical literacy," "risk communication," "health communication," and "pandemic," in the Pan American Health Organization Virtual Health Library, PubMed, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Google Scholar databases. No filters were applied for dates, language, or publication type.

RESULTS

Of the 87 articles identified, four met the inclusion criteria. Four main messages were recognized that relate statistical literacy and risk communication: 1) risk communication and statistical literacy level affect individual and collective decision-making; 2) communication of uncertainty should include what is known and not known with regard to statistics and risks; 3) the use of graphics and visuals is key to appropriately informing the population; and 4) different formats should be used to improve communication, always adjusted to the population's statistical literacy level.

CONCLUSIONS

Statistical literacy plays a key role in communicating risks related to health in general and COVID-19 vaccination in particular. In health emergencies, proper communication of risk and associated uncertainty should be clear, transparent, and timely.

摘要

目的

描述统计素养和恰当的风险沟通在与新冠疫苗接种相关的沟通策略中的作用。

方法

2021年1月进行了一项范围综述,在泛美卫生组织虚拟健康图书馆、PubMed、科学网、EBSCO和谷歌学术数据库中使用关键词“统计素养”“风险沟通”“健康沟通”和“大流行”。未对日期、语言或出版物类型进行筛选。

结果

在识别出的87篇文章中,4篇符合纳入标准。识别出了与统计素养和风险沟通相关的四条主要信息:1)风险沟通和统计素养水平影响个人和集体决策;2)不确定性的沟通应包括关于统计和风险已知的和未知的内容;3)使用图表和视觉效果是向民众恰当提供信息的关键;4)应使用不同形式来改善沟通,始终根据民众的统计素养水平进行调整。

结论

统计素养在一般健康相关风险尤其是新冠疫苗接种风险的沟通中起着关键作用。在卫生紧急情况中,对风险及相关不确定性的恰当沟通应清晰、透明且及时。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d8/8407599/ca0ef641db5d/rpsp-45-e108_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d8/8407599/57c9034f31d8/rpsp-45-e108_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d8/8407599/ca0ef641db5d/rpsp-45-e108_Figure2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d8/8407599/57c9034f31d8/rpsp-45-e108_Figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/31d8/8407599/ca0ef641db5d/rpsp-45-e108_Figure2.jpg

相似文献

1
[Statistical literacy and risk communication for COVID-19 vaccination: a scoping reviewLiteracia estatística e comunicação de risco para a vacinação contra a COVID-19: revisão de escopo].[COVID-19疫苗接种的统计素养与风险沟通:一项范围综述 关于COVID-19疫苗接种的统计素养与风险沟通:范围综述]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Aug 31;45:e108. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.108. eCollection 2021.
2
Using health literacy principles to improve understanding of evolving evidence in health emergencies: Optimisation and evaluation of a COVID-19 vaccination risk-benefit calculator.利用健康素养原则提高对突发卫生事件中不断变化证据的理解:COVID-19 疫苗接种风险效益计算器的优化和评估。
Vaccine. 2024 Oct 24;42(24):126296. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126296. Epub 2024 Sep 3.
3
Health Literacy and Acceptance of COVID-19 Preventive Measures and Vaccination in the European Union: A Scoping Review.欧盟中健康素养与对COVID-19预防措施及疫苗接种的接受度:一项范围综述
Health Lit Res Pract. 2025 Jan;9(1):e46-e55. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20250219-01. Epub 2025 Mar 7.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
6
Health literacy and COVID-19 vaccine acceptance worldwide: A systematic review.全球健康素养与新冠疫苗接种接受度:一项系统评价。
SAGE Open Med. 2023 Oct 9;11:20503121231197869. doi: 10.1177/20503121231197869. eCollection 2023.
7
The effectiveness of health literacy interventions on the informed consent process of health care users: a systematic review protocol.健康素养干预措施对医疗保健使用者知情同意过程的有效性:一项系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Oct;13(10):82-94. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2304.
8
Which criteria characterize a health literate health care organization? - a scoping review on organizational health literacy.哪些标准可以体现一个有文化素养的医疗机构?——一个关于组织文化素养的范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Jul 6;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06604-z.
9
Communication to promote and support physical distancing for COVID-19 prevention and control.促进和支持预防和控制 COVID-19 的物理隔离的沟通。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD015144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015144.
10
Exploring Chatbot contributions to enhancing vaccine literacy and uptake: A scoping review of the literature.探索聊天机器人对提高疫苗知识水平和接种率的贡献:文献综述
Vaccine. 2025 Jan 12;44:126559. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2024.126559. Epub 2024 Nov 30.

引用本文的文献

1
The 2024 South America ablaze: health impacts and policy imperatives for protecting population health in an era of wildfires.2024年南美洲烈火肆虐:野火时代保护民众健康的健康影响及政策要务
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2025 Jun 26;48:101160. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2025.101160. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines: From clinical trials to real life.新冠疫苗的有效性:从临床试验到现实生活。
Therapie. 2021 Jul-Aug;76(4):277-283. doi: 10.1016/j.therap.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 May 12.
2
Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia.基于 rAd26 和 rAd5 载体的异源初免-加强型 COVID-19 疫苗的安全性和有效性:俄罗斯一项随机对照 3 期临床试验的中期分析。
Lancet. 2021 Feb 20;397(10275):671-681. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00234-8. Epub 2021 Feb 2.
3
COVID-19 vaccines: where we stand and challenges ahead.
Impact of risk communication on patient's safety during the pandemic.
疫情期间风险沟通对患者安全的影响。
Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2023 Mar 17;14:20420986231159752. doi: 10.1177/20420986231159752. eCollection 2023.
COVID-19 疫苗:我们的现状和未来的挑战。
Cell Death Differ. 2021 Feb;28(2):626-639. doi: 10.1038/s41418-020-00720-9. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
4
Looking beyond COVID-19 vaccine phase 3 trials.展望 COVID-19 疫苗 III 期临床试验之外。
Nat Med. 2021 Feb;27(2):205-211. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01230-y. Epub 2021 Jan 19.
5
Psychological characteristics associated with COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy and resistance in Ireland and the United Kingdom.爱尔兰和英国与新冠疫苗犹豫及抵触相关的心理特征。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 4;12(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20226-9.
6
Efficacy and Safety of the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine.mRNA-1273 新型冠状病毒疫苗的有效性和安全性。
N Engl J Med. 2021 Feb 4;384(5):403-416. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2035389. Epub 2020 Dec 30.
7
COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in the UK: the Oxford coronavirus explanations, attitudes, and narratives survey (Oceans) II.英国对 COVID-19 疫苗的犹豫:牛津冠状病毒解释、态度和叙事调查(海洋) II。
Psychol Med. 2022 Oct;52(14):3127-3141. doi: 10.1017/S0033291720005188. Epub 2020 Dec 11.
8
Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA Covid-19 Vaccine.BNT162b2 mRNA 新冠病毒疫苗的安全性和有效性。
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 31;383(27):2603-2615. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2034577. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
9
Communicating Uncertainties during the COVID-19 Outbreak.新冠疫情期间的不确定性沟通
Health Commun. 2020 Dec;35(14):1729-1731. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2020.1838092.
10
Social media and vaccine hesitancy.社交媒体与疫苗犹豫
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-004206. Epub 2020 Oct 23.