School of Public Health, Physiotherapy, and Sports Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
ISPED (Bordeaux School of Public Health) , University of Bordeaux , Bordeaux, France.
J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2022 Aug;9(4):1210-1224. doi: 10.1007/s40615-021-01063-y. Epub 2021 Jun 14.
Few studies have assessed how the intersection of social determinants of health and environmental hazards contributes to racial disparities in COVID-19. The aim of our study was to compare COVID-19 disparities in testing and positivity to cumulative environmental health impacts, and to assess how unique social and environmental determinants of health relate to COVID-19 positivity in Seattle, King County, WA, at the census tract level. Publicly available data (n = 397 census tracts) were obtained from Public Health-Seattle & King County, 2018 ACS 5-year estimates, and the Washington Tracking Network. COVID-19 testing and positive case rates as of July 12, 2020, were mapped and compared to Washington State Environmental Health Disparities (EHD) Map cumulative impact rankings. We calculated odds ratios from a series of univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses using cumulative impact rankings, and community-level socioeconomic, health, and environmental factors as predictors and having ≥ 10% or < 10% census tract positivity as the binary outcome variable. We found a remarkable overlap between Washington EHD cumulative impact rankings and COVID-19 positivity in King County. Census tracts with ≥ 10 % COVID-19 positivity had significantly lower COVID-19 testing rates and higher proportions of people of color and faced a combination of low socioeconomic status-related outcomes, poor community health outcomes, and significantly higher concentrations of fine particulate matter (PM). King County communities experiencing high rates of COVID-19 face a disproportionate cumulative burden of environmental and social inequities. Cumulative environmental health impacts should therefore systematically be considered when assessing for risk of exposure to and health complications resulting from COVID-19.
很少有研究评估健康的社会决定因素和环境危害的交叉点如何导致 COVID-19 中的种族差异。我们的研究目的是比较 COVID-19 在检测和阳性率方面的差异与累积环境健康影响,并评估在西雅图金县(WA)的人口普查区层面上,独特的社会和环境健康决定因素与 COVID-19 阳性率的关系。从公共卫生西雅图与金县(Public Health-Seattle & King County)、2018 年 ACS 5 年估计数和华盛顿跟踪网络获得了公开数据(n = 397 个人口普查区)。截至 2020 年 7 月 12 日,对 COVID-19 检测和阳性病例率进行了映射,并与华盛顿州环境健康差异(EHD)地图的累积影响排名进行了比较。我们使用累积影响排名以及社区层面的社会经济、健康和环境因素作为预测因素,使用≥10%或<10%的人口普查区阳性率作为二元结果变量,从一系列单变量和多变量逻辑回归分析中计算了优势比。我们发现华盛顿 EHD 累积影响排名与金县的 COVID-19 阳性率之间存在显著重叠。COVID-19 阳性率≥10%的人口普查区的 COVID-19 检测率明显较低,并且有色人种的比例更高,面临一系列与社会经济地位相关的结局较差、社区健康结局较差以及细颗粒物(PM)浓度明显较高的情况。金县面临高 COVID-19 率的社区面临着不成比例的环境和社会不平等的累积负担。因此,在评估 COVID-19 的暴露风险和由此产生的健康并发症时,应系统地考虑累积的健康影响。