Suppr超能文献

评估年轻足球运动员战术知识和战术表现的测试的范围回顾。

Scoping review of tests to assess tactical knowledge and tactical performance of young soccer players.

机构信息

Group of Studies and Researches Applied in Soccer (GEPAFUT), Department of Physical Education, State University of Maringá, Maringá, Brazil.

Research Unit for Sport and Physical Activity (CIDAF), Faculty of Sport Sciences and Physical Education, University of Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal.

出版信息

J Sports Sci. 2021 Sep;39(18):2051-2067. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2021.1916262. Epub 2021 Sep 6.

Abstract

This scoping review aimed to systematically map studies/tests for assessing the tactical domain of young soccer players. The study followed the PRISMA-ScR and Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines. The databases searched were Scopus, SPORTDiscus, SciELO, LILACS, and BDTD. The eligibility criteria were defined based on the elements of population, context, and concept, without restrictions on the period, language, and type of publication. Twenty-four papers were included, from 1997 to 2020, totalling 29 tests/instruments for the assessment of the tactical domain, with the majority of studies having an European sample. Twelve terms were used to nominate the tactical component, regardless of the assessment method and approach. Six tests met eight or nine criteria in the critical appraisal: TCTOF, TACSIS Spanish version, Semi-Structured Interview, TCTP-OE, GPET, and FUTSAT. Thus, it is concluded that studies and tests for the assessment of the tactical domain of young soccer players are recent and mainly European; there is no consensus about the adopted terminology; and few tests met the majority of the quality criteria. Therefore, we suggest: a) the construction/adaptation of tests with samples from other continents; b) the use of the proposed criteria; and c) that the terms tactical knowledge and tactical performance are adopted.

摘要

本范围综述旨在系统地绘制评估年轻足球运动员战术领域的研究/测试。该研究遵循 PRISMA-ScR 和 Joanna Briggs 研究所的指南。搜索的数据库包括 Scopus、SPORTDiscus、SciELO、LILACS 和 BDTD。根据人群、背景和概念的要素定义了纳入标准,没有对时间段、语言和出版物类型进行限制。纳入了 24 篇论文,时间跨度从 1997 年至 2020 年,共计 29 项用于评估战术领域的测试/工具,其中大多数研究都有欧洲样本。12 个术语用于命名战术部分,无论评估方法和方法如何。六项测试在关键评估中满足八项或九项标准:TCTOF、TACSIS 西班牙语版、半结构化访谈、TCTP-OE、GPET 和 FUTSAT。因此,可以得出结论,评估年轻足球运动员战术领域的研究和测试是最近的,主要是欧洲的;关于采用的术语没有共识;很少有测试满足大多数质量标准。因此,我们建议:a)使用来自其他大陆的样本构建/改编测试;b)使用提出的标准;c)采用战术知识和战术表现的术语。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验