Paucar Uribe Juan David, Becerra-Patiño Boryi A, Olivares-Arancibia Jorge, Yáñez-Sepúlveda Rodrigo, Vasquez-Bonilla Aldo, Rojas-Valverde Daniel, López-Gil José Francisco, Machado Guilherme
Faculty of Physical Education, National Pedagogical University, Valmaria Cl. 183 # 5199, Bogotá 111166, Colombia.
Programa de Doctorado en Ciencias de la Actividad Física y del Deporte, University of Murcia, 30720 Santiago de la Ribera, Spain.
Sports (Basel). 2025 Jun 3;13(6):177. doi: 10.3390/sports13060177.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: Various studies have investigated the importance of perceptual-cognitive skills in decision-making and the expert performance of athletes. However, bibliometric study has yet to identify research trends on this topic. The objective of this study was to perform a bibliometric review to identify the research trends in the study of soccer decision-making. METHOD: A total of 172 studies were included in the databases. RESULTS: The year 2021 was the year with the highest number of published studies ( = 23), and 2016 was the year with the highest number of citations ( = 692). The average number of citations per document was 19.79. The concepts that have the greatest occurrence in the investigations are performance ( = 68), decision-making ( 54), expertise ( 32), skill ( 23), and anticipation ( 22). The journals with the highest number of published documents are the (10 documents and 437 citations) and (11 documents and 349 citations). The countries with the highest number of published documents and citations are England ( 46 documents and 996 citations), Germany ( 32 documents and 749 citations), and Spain ( 38 documents and 597 citations). German Sport University Cologne is the organization that has the most publications and citations ( 19 and 531). CONCLUSIONS: Existing knowledge production on decision-making in soccer has a preference for the study of two major categories: one related to the analysis of the factors associated with perceptual-cognitive skills, mental fatigue, anticipation, creativity, and memory, whereas the second is more related to the study that has decision-making in the manifestations of specific game performance, between experts and novices, in the precision of technical actions, such as the pass, as well as in a methodology for the selection of athletes.
背景/目的:多项研究探讨了感知认知技能在决策和运动员专家表现中的重要性。然而,文献计量学研究尚未确定该主题的研究趋势。本研究的目的是进行文献计量学综述,以确定足球决策研究的趋势。 方法:数据库中总共纳入了172项研究。 结果:2021年是发表研究数量最多的一年(=23),2016年是被引次数最多的一年(=692)。每篇文献的平均被引次数为19.79。在调查中出现频率最高的概念是表现(=68)、决策(54)、专业知识(32)、技能(23)和预判(22)。发表文献数量最多的期刊是《》(10篇文献,437次引用)和《》(11篇文献,349次引用)。发表文献和被引次数最多的国家是英国(46篇文献,996次引用)、德国(32篇文献,749次引用)和西班牙(38篇文献,597次引用)。科隆德国体育大学是发表文献和被引次数最多的机构(19篇文献,531次引用)。 结论:现有关于足球决策的知识产出倾向于研究两个主要类别:一类与分析与感知认知技能、精神疲劳、预判、创造力和记忆相关的因素有关,而另一类则更多地与研究特定比赛表现中的决策有关,包括专家与新手之间、技术动作(如传球)的精准度以及运动员选拔方法等方面。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-11-11
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022-5-20
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016-4
Health Technol Assess. 2001
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020-10-19
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024-11-20
J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2024-11-15
Digit Health. 2023-6-20
Front Psychol. 2023-6-8
Sensors (Basel). 2023-5-4