• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Validation of the food craving Acceptance and action questionnaire (FAAQ) in a weight loss-seeking sample.验证减肥寻求样本中食物渴望接受和行动问卷(FAAQ)的有效性。
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105680. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105680. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
2
The Role of Acceptance in Eating Behaviors-Spanish Validation of Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ-S).接纳在饮食行为中的作用——食物渴望接纳与行动问卷(FAAQ-S)的西班牙语验证
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 9;12:717886. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717886. eCollection 2021.
3
The development and validation of the food craving acceptance and action questionnaire (FAAQ).食物渴求接纳与行动问卷(FAAQ)的编制与验证。
Eat Behav. 2011 Aug;12(3):182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2011.04.008. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
4
Support for a two-dimensional model of food craving using self-report questionnaire and cue-reactivity methodologies.支持使用自我报告问卷和线索反应方法的二维食物渴望模型。
Int J Eat Disord. 2020 Sep;53(9):1439-1449. doi: 10.1002/eat.23290. Epub 2020 May 14.
5
Refinement and Validation of the Social Participation Restrictions Questionnaire: An Application of Rasch Analysis and Traditional Psychometric Analysis Techniques.社会参与限制问卷的细化和验证:Rasch 分析和传统心理测量分析技术的应用。
Ear Hear. 2019 Mar/Apr;40(2):328-339. doi: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000000618.
6
[Factorial analysis and internal consistency of the French version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS 20), in obese women].[肥胖女性中多伦多述情障碍量表(TAS 20)法语版的因子分析与内部一致性]
Encephale. 2002 Jul-Aug;28(4):277-82.
7
Targeting acceptance in the management of food craving: The mediating roles of eating styles and thought suppression.针对食物渴望管理中的接纳:饮食方式和思维抑制的中介作用。
Eat Behav. 2018 Apr;29:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
8
Early improvement in food cravings are associated with long-term weight loss success in a large clinical sample.在一个大型临床样本中,食物渴望的早期改善与长期减肥成功相关。
Int J Obes (Lond). 2017 Aug;41(8):1232-1236. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2017.89. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
9
Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Acceptance and Action Questionnaire for Weight-Related Difficulties-Revised (AAQW-R) in a United States Sample of Adults with Overweight and Obesity.针对美国超重和肥胖成年人样本的体重相关困扰接受与行动问卷修订版(AAQW-R)的验证性因素分析。
J Contextual Behav Sci. 2020 Jan;15:189-196. doi: 10.1016/j.jcbs.2020.01.006. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
10
Preliminary validation and principal components analysis of the Control of Eating Questionnaire (CoEQ) for the experience of food craving.用于食物渴望体验的饮食控制问卷(CoEQ)的初步验证及主成分分析
Eur J Clin Nutr. 2015 Dec;69(12):1313-7. doi: 10.1038/ejcn.2015.57. Epub 2015 Apr 8.

引用本文的文献

1
Validity and reliability study of the Turkish adaptation of the Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire.《食物渴望接纳与行动问卷》土耳其语改编版的效度与信度研究
Health Promot Perspect. 2024 Oct 31;14(3):268-274. doi: 10.34172/hpp.42811. eCollection 2024.
2
Experiential Avoidance in Primary Care Providers: Psychometric Properties of the Brazilian "Acceptance and Action Questionnaire" (AAQ-II) and Its Criterion Validity on Mood Disorder-Related Psychological Distress.初级保健提供者的经验回避:巴西“接受与行动问卷”(AAQ-II)的心理计量特性及其在心境障碍相关心理困扰的效标效度。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Dec 23;20(1):225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20010225.

本文引用的文献

1
Constructing validity: New developments in creating objective measuring instruments.结构效度:客观测量工具的新发展。
Psychol Assess. 2019 Dec;31(12):1412-1427. doi: 10.1037/pas0000626. Epub 2019 Mar 21.
2
Long-Term Follow-up of the Mind Your Health Project: Acceptance-Based versus Standard Behavioral Treatment for Obesity.《Mind Your Health 项目的长期随访:肥胖的接受基与标准行为治疗》。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019 Apr;27(4):565-571. doi: 10.1002/oby.22412. Epub 2019 Feb 26.
3
Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health, Social, and Behavioral Research: A Primer.健康、社会和行为研究量表开发与验证的最佳实践:入门指南。
Front Public Health. 2018 Jun 11;6:149. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149. eCollection 2018.
4
Targeting acceptance in the management of food craving: The mediating roles of eating styles and thought suppression.针对食物渴望管理中的接纳:饮食方式和思维抑制的中介作用。
Eat Behav. 2018 Apr;29:132-136. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2018.04.002. Epub 2018 Apr 12.
5
Efficacy of environmental and acceptance-based enhancements to behavioral weight loss treatment: The ENACT trial.基于环境和接纳的行为减肥治疗强化措施的疗效:ENACT试验。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2017 May;25(5):866-872. doi: 10.1002/oby.21813. Epub 2017 Mar 23.
6
Acceptance-based versus standard behavioral treatment for obesity: Results from the mind your health randomized controlled trial.接受性治疗与标准行为治疗肥胖症的效果比较:来自“关注你的健康”随机对照试验的结果。
Obesity (Silver Spring). 2016 Oct;24(10):2050-6. doi: 10.1002/oby.21601.
7
The role of negative reinforcement eating expectancies in the relation between experiential avoidance and disinhibition.消极强化进食预期在经验性回避与去抑制之间关系中的作用。
Eat Behav. 2016 Apr;21:129-34. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2016.01.003. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
8
Psychometric properties of the English Food Cravings Questionnaire-Trait-reduced (FCQ-T-r).简化版英文食物渴望问卷(FCQ-T-r)的心理测量学特性。
Eat Behav. 2016 Jan;20:34-8. doi: 10.1016/j.eatbeh.2015.11.011. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
9
Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.有序数据的验证性因子分析:稳健极大似然法与对角加权最小二乘法的比较
Behav Res Methods. 2016 Sep;48(3):936-49. doi: 10.3758/s13428-015-0619-7.
10
Measuring the Ability to Tolerate Activity-Related Discomfort: Initial Validation of the Physical Activity Acceptance Questionnaire (PAAQ).测量耐受与活动相关不适的能力:体力活动接受问卷(PAAQ)的初步验证
J Phys Act Health. 2015 May;12(5):717-6. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2013-0338. Epub 2014 Aug 7.

验证减肥寻求样本中食物渴望接受和行动问卷(FAAQ)的有效性。

Validation of the food craving Acceptance and action questionnaire (FAAQ) in a weight loss-seeking sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton 226, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton 226, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Center for Neurointestinal Health, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit Street, Boston, MA, 02114, USA; Harvard Medical School, 25 Shattuck St, Boston, MA, 02115, USA.

Department of Psychology, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton 226, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA; Center for Weight, Eating, and Lifestyle Science, Drexel University, 3141 Chestnut Street, Stratton 226, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.

出版信息

Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105680. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105680. Epub 2021 Sep 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105680
PMID:34487734
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8671291/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Food Craving Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (FAAQ) was developed to measure psychological flexibility around food-related internal experiences (e.g., thoughts, feelings, urges) and has two subscales, acceptance and willingness. However, the FAAQ factor structure has not yet been systematically validated with a clinically relevant sample.

METHODS

Two weight-loss treatment seeking samples (total N = 462; 80.4% female) ages 18 to 70 (M = 52.6, SD = 9.8) completed the FAAQ before and after group-based treatment of overweight or obesity.

RESULTS

Confirmatory factor analysis on the FAAQ's previously observed two-factor model produced poor model fit. An alternative 7-item model removing specific items that contributed to poor fit and were conceptually relevant to remove provided good model fit. The resulting revised 7-item FAAQ (items 1,3,6 removed) had adequate internal consistency and significant predictive validity for the Total score and subscales, and showed initial construct validity for the Total score.

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this study suggest researchers and clinicians should now use the 7-item FAAQ-II, which retains the Willingness and Acceptance subscales. Future research is needed with other relevant samples to confirm the FAAQ-II's factor structure and psychometric properties.

摘要

目的

食物渴望接纳与行动问卷(FAAQ)旨在衡量与食物相关的内部体验(如想法、感觉、冲动)方面的心理灵活性,它有两个分量表,即接纳和意愿。然而,FAAQ 的因子结构尚未通过具有临床相关性的样本进行系统验证。

方法

两个寻求体重减轻治疗的样本(共 462 名;80.4%为女性),年龄在 18 至 70 岁之间(M=52.6,SD=9.8),在接受基于小组的超重或肥胖治疗前后完成了 FAAQ。

结果

对 FAAQ 先前观察到的两因素模型进行验证性因子分析,结果显示模型拟合不佳。一个替代的 7 项模型去除了导致不良拟合且在概念上与去除相关的特定项目,提供了良好的模型拟合。由此产生的修订后的 7 项 FAAQ(删除项目 1、3、6)具有足够的内部一致性和对总分和分量表的显著预测有效性,并显示出总分的初步结构有效性。

结论

本研究结果表明,研究人员和临床医生现在应该使用保留意愿和接纳分量表的 7 项 FAAQ-II。需要对其他相关样本进行进一步研究,以确认 FAAQ-II 的因子结构和心理测量特性。