Murasaki Mitsukuni, Inoue Yoshifumi, Nakamura Hiroshi, Kinoshita Toshihiko
Institute of CNS Pharmacology, Kanagawa, Japan.
Medical Affairs, Sumitomo Dainippon Pharma Co, Ltd, 1-13-1 Kyobashi, Chuo, Tokyo, 104-8356, Japan.
Ann Gen Psychiatry. 2021 Sep 7;20(1):41. doi: 10.1186/s12991-021-00361-3.
In general, the course of schizophrenia is chronic accompanied not only by positive and negative symptoms but also by cognitive dysfunction associated with psychosocial disability, and thus treatment combining antipsychotics and psychological therapy is considered promising. This review focused on two prospective, open-label, multicenter, phase 3 long-term studies for approval of oral blonanserin for the treatment of schizophrenia. These two studies included both inpatients and outpatients with variable disease duration or symptom prominence according to the Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS). The selected two studies consisted of almost the same study schedule and eligibility criteria but different protocols regarding prior medications and concomitant antipsychotics. The proportion of patients who had a baseline PANSS negative score higher than the positive score was 82.2 and 67.2% in the two studies. In both studies, patients with an illness duration of ≥ 10 years were the most common. Based on the clinical symptoms at baseline, the physician determined the treatment: blonanserin monotherapy, blonanserin in combination with the existing antipsychotic medication, or therapy simplified to haloperidol together with blonanserin. The 28-week completion rate for long-term blonanserin treatment was high in both studies (82.2 and 78.7%). The types of adverse events in both studies were similar to those in the preceding 8-week randomized, active-controlled studies in Japan, which were included in the application package for the approval of oral blonanserin for patients with schizophrenia. Long-term blonanserin use did not increase the risk of extrapyramidal symptoms but reduced the dose of antiparkinsonian drugs, minimally affecting functioning. In both studies, the PANSS total score, positive score, and negative score were improved at the last observation carried forward compared with those at baseline. In conclusion, blonanserin is useful for long-term treatment of chronic schizophrenic patients when the appropriate management of clinical symptoms and adverse drug reactions are applied. Blonanserin might represent a promising treatment option that partially or completely relieves patients with chronic schizophrenia of polypharmacy. Blonanserin may possibly fit both the current real-world clinical setting and the currently recommended approach to antipsychotic medication.
一般而言,精神分裂症病程呈慢性,不仅伴有阳性和阴性症状,还伴有与社会心理残疾相关的认知功能障碍,因此抗精神病药物与心理治疗相结合的疗法被认为很有前景。本综述聚焦于两项前瞻性、开放标签、多中心、3期长期研究,旨在批准口服布南色林用于治疗精神分裂症。这两项研究纳入了根据阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)划分的疾病持续时间或症状严重程度各异的住院患者和门诊患者。所选的两项研究几乎具有相同的研究时间表和纳入标准,但在既往用药和联合使用的抗精神病药物方面有不同的方案。在这两项研究中,基线PANSS阴性得分高于阳性得分的患者比例分别为82.2%和67.2%。在两项研究中,病程≥10年的患者最为常见。根据基线时的临床症状,医生确定治疗方案:布南色林单药治疗、布南色林与现有抗精神病药物联合使用,或简化为氟哌啶醇与布南色林联合治疗。两项研究中布南色林长期治疗的28周完成率都很高(分别为82.2%和78.7%)。两项研究中不良事件的类型与日本之前的8周随机、活性对照研究相似,这些研究被纳入了口服布南色林用于精神分裂症患者批准申请的数据包中。长期使用布南色林不会增加锥体外系症状的风险,但会减少抗帕金森药物的剂量,对功能影响极小。在两项研究中,与基线时相比,末次观察结转时PANSS总分、阳性得分和阴性得分均有所改善。总之,当对临床症状和药物不良反应进行适当管理时,布南色林对慢性精神分裂症患者的长期治疗有用。布南色林可能是一种有前景的治疗选择,可部分或完全缓解慢性精神分裂症患者的多药联用情况。布南色林可能既符合当前的实际临床情况,也符合目前推荐的抗精神病药物治疗方法。