Marinaci Tiziana, Venuleo Claudia, Gennaro Alessandro, Sammut Gordon
Laboratory of Applied Psychology and Intervention, Department of History, Society and Human Studies, University of Salento, Lecce, Italy.
Department of Dynamic and Clinical Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Heliyon. 2021 Sep;7(9):e07891. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07891. Epub 2021 Sep 1.
The COVID-19 pandemic further highlighted the crucial role of people's compliance for the success of measures designed to protect public health. Within the frame of Semiotic Cultural Psycho-social Theory, we discuss how the analysis of people's ways of making sense of the crisis scenario can help to identify the resources or constraints underlying the ways the citizens evaluate and comply with the anti-covid measures. This study aimed to examine how Italian adults interpreted what was happening in the first wave of the pandemic and how the interpretation varied in the period up to the beginning of the second wave. Diaries were collected for six months, from 11 April to 3 November 2020. Participants were periodically asked to talk about their life 'in the last few weeks'. A total number of 606 diaries were collected. The Automated Method for Content Analysis (ACASM) procedure was applied to the texts to detect the factorial dimensions - interpreted as the markers of latent dimensions of meanings- underpinning (dis)similarities in the respondents' discourses. ANOVA were applied to examine the dissimilarities in the association between factorial dimensions and production time. Findings show that significant transitions occurred over time in the main dimensions of meaning identified. Whereas the first phase was characterized by a focus on one's own daily life and the attempt to make sense of the changes occurring in the personal sphere, in the following phases the socio-economic impact of the crisis was brought to the fore, along with the hope to returning to the "normality" of the pre-rupture scenario. We argued that, despite the differences, a low sense of the interweaving between the personal and public sphere emerged in the accounts of the pandemic crisis throughout the sixth months considered; a split that, we speculate, can explain the "free for all" movement that occurred at the end of the first wave and the beginning of the second wave.
新冠疫情进一步凸显了民众的依从性对于旨在保护公众健康的措施取得成功的关键作用。在符号文化心理社会理论框架内,我们探讨了对人们理解危机情景方式的分析如何有助于识别市民评估和遵守抗疫措施方式背后的资源或制约因素。本研究旨在考察意大利成年人如何解读疫情第一波期间所发生的事情,以及这种解读在第二波疫情开始前的这段时间里是如何变化的。我们从2020年4月11日至11月3日收集了为期六个月的日记。参与者被定期要求讲述他们“过去几周”的生活。总共收集了606篇日记。我们将内容分析自动方法(ACASM)程序应用于文本,以检测构成受访者话语(不)相似性基础的因子维度——被解释为潜在意义维度的标志。我们应用方差分析来检验因子维度与创作时间之间关联的差异。研究结果表明,在所确定的主要意义维度上,随着时间推移发生了显著变化。第一阶段的特点是关注自己的日常生活,并试图理解个人领域发生的变化,而在随后的阶段,危机的社会经济影响凸显出来,同时还有回归疫情前“正常”状态的希望。我们认为,尽管存在差异,但在所考察的六个月里,关于疫情危机的描述中都出现了对个人和公共领域交织感较低的情况;我们推测,这种分裂可以解释第一波疫情末期和第二波疫情初期出现的“人人为己”的行为。