Romano Virginia, Ancillotti Mirko, Mascalzoni Deborah, Biasiotto Roberta
Institute for Biomedicine, Eurac Research, Affiliated Institute of the University of Lübeck, Bolzano, Italy.
Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics, Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Humanit Soc Sci Commun. 2022;9(1):342. doi: 10.1057/s41599-022-01358-3. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
At the beginning of 2020, the widespread diffusion of SARS-CoV-2 rapidly became a worldwide priority. In Italy, the government implemented a lockdown for more than two months (March 9-May 18). Aware of the uniqueness of such an experience, we designed an online qualitative study focused on three main dimensions: daily life during the lockdown, relationships with others, and public health issues. The aim was to gain insights into people's experiences of, and attitudes toward, the changes caused by public health measures implemented as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. We conducted 18 semi-structured interviews with Italian residents. The interviewees were recruited through mediators using purposive sampling to obtain a balanced sample with respect to age, gender, education, and geographical residence. Interviews were analyzed through qualitative content analysis. The lockdown affected a variety of aspects of people's life, resulting in a significant re-shaping of daily activities and relationships. These changes, which entailed both positive and negative aspects, were met with resilience. Even though public health measures were generally considered acceptable and adequate, they were also perceived to generate uncertainty and stress as well as to reveal tensions within the public health system. When tasked with imagining a scenario with saturated intensive care units and the need for selection criteria, respondents showed a tendency to dodge the question and struggled to formulate criteria. Media and news were found to be confusing, leading to a renewed critical attitude toward information. The findings shed some light on the impact of the lockdown on people's daily life and its effects on relationships with others. Furthermore, the study contributes to an understanding of people's reasons for, and capacity to respond to, emergency public health measures.
2020年初,严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)的广泛传播迅速成为全球关注的重点。在意大利,政府实施了两个多月的封锁措施(3月9日至5月18日)。鉴于这一经历的独特性,我们设计了一项在线定性研究,重点关注三个主要方面:封锁期间的日常生活、与他人的关系以及公共卫生问题。目的是深入了解人们对因应对新冠疫情而实施的公共卫生措施所带来变化的体验和态度。我们对意大利居民进行了18次半结构化访谈。通过调解人采用目的抽样法招募受访者,以获得在年龄、性别、教育程度和地理居住方面均衡的样本。通过定性内容分析法对访谈进行分析。封锁影响了人们生活的各个方面,导致日常活动和人际关系发生了重大重塑。这些变化既有积极的一面,也有消极的一面,人们表现出了适应能力。尽管公共卫生措施总体上被认为是可以接受且足够的,但人们也认为它们会产生不确定性和压力,同时还暴露出公共卫生系统内部的紧张关系。当被要求设想重症监护病房饱和以及需要制定选择标准的情景时,受访者表现出回避问题的倾向,难以制定标准。人们发现媒体和新闻令人困惑,导致对信息产生了新的批判态度。这些研究结果揭示了封锁对人们日常生活的影响及其对与他人关系的作用。此外,该研究有助于理解人们对应急公共卫生措施的接受原因和应对能力。