Department of Internal Medicine 3 - Rheumatology and Immunology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Universitätstrasse 25a, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Deutsches Zentrum Für Immuntherapie, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg and Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2022 Oct;63(2):138-151. doi: 10.1007/s12016-021-08890-1. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
Autoantibodies represent a hallmark of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), with the rheumatoid factor (RF) and antibodies against citrullinated proteins (ACPA) being the most acknowledged ones. RA patients who are positive for RF and/or ACPA ("seropositive") in general display a different etiology and disease course compared to so-called "seronegative" patients. Still, the seronegative patient population is very heterogeneous and not well characterized. Due to the identification of new autoantibodies and advancements in the diagnosis of rheumatic diseases in the last years, the group of seronegative patients is constantly shrinking. Aside from antibodies towards various post-translational modifications, recent studies describe autoantibodies targeting some native proteins, further broadening the spectrum of recognized antigens. Next to the detection of new autoantibody groups, much research has been done to answer the question if and how autoantibodies contribute to the pathogenesis of RA. Since autoantibodies can be detected years prior to RA onset, it is a matter of debate whether their presence alone is sufficient to trigger the disease. Nevertheless, there is gathering evidence of direct autoantibody effector functions, such as stimulation of osteoclastogenesis and synovial fibroblast migration in in vitro experiments. In addition, autoantibody positive patients display a worse clinical course and stronger radiographic progression. In this review, we discuss current findings regarding different autoantibody types, the underlying disease-driving mechanisms, the role of Fab and Fc glycosylation and clinical implications.
自身抗体是类风湿关节炎 (RA) 的一个标志,其中类风湿因子 (RF) 和抗瓜氨酸化蛋白抗体 (ACPA) 是最被认可的两种。一般来说,RF 和/或 ACPA 阳性(“血清阳性”)的 RA 患者与所谓的“血清阴性”患者在病因和疾病过程方面存在差异。然而,血清阴性患者群体非常多样化,且特征不明显。由于近年来新的自身抗体的鉴定和风湿性疾病诊断的进步,血清阴性患者的群体一直在不断缩小。除了针对各种翻译后修饰的抗体外,最近的研究还描述了针对一些天然蛋白质的自身抗体,进一步拓宽了公认抗原的范围。除了检测新的自身抗体群外,许多研究还致力于回答自身抗体是否以及如何有助于 RA 的发病机制的问题。由于自身抗体可以在 RA 发病前多年被检测到,因此仅存在自身抗体是否足以引发疾病是一个有争议的问题。然而,越来越多的证据表明存在直接的自身抗体效应功能,例如在体外实验中刺激破骨细胞生成和滑膜成纤维细胞迁移。此外,自身抗体阳性的患者表现出更差的临床病程和更强的影像学进展。在这篇综述中,我们讨论了关于不同自身抗体类型、潜在的疾病驱动机制、Fab 和 Fc 糖基化的作用以及临床意义的最新发现。