Eu Elisa Zhen Rong, Sameeha Mohd Jamil
Nutritional Sciences Programme, Centre for Community Health Studies (ReaCH), Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Front Nutr. 2021 Aug 23;8:674427. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2021.674427. eCollection 2021.
This retrospective cross-sectional study was conducted to study consumers' perceptions of healthy food availability in online food delivery applications (OFD apps) among public university students in Malaysia and its association with their food choices. A total of 290 subjects aged 19-29 years old were recruited from 20 public universities in Malaysia snowball sampling. Data was collected through an online questionnaire which consisted of socio-demographic status, use of OFD apps (most frequently used brand, usage frequency, food choice, and expenditure per transaction), factors affecting food choice in OFD apps, consumers' perceptions of healthy food availability in OFD apps and recommendation for improvements. The most frequently used apps among the subjects was Food Panda (46.6%), however, majority of the subjects in this study (41.4%) rarely used OFD apps. Also, most of the subjects ordered unhealthy food (77.6%) and spent up to RM15-RM19 for each transaction (43.1%). There was no significant difference between the use of OFD apps and gender ( > 0.05). Among the five food choice motives, "price and convenience" motive was the most influencing food choice factor in OFD apps. Majority of the subjects (76.9%) had a negative perception of healthy food availability (variety, price, and quality of healthy food) in OFD apps. No significant association was found between consumers' perceptions of healthy food availability in OFD apps and their food choices made in OFD apps among the subjects in this study ( > 0.05). Also, majority (85.9%) responded they are keen to purchase healthy foods through OFD apps if they are given an option. However, most Malaysian public university students perceived that there were not much variety of healthy food, of good quality and affordable price, available in OFD apps. This finding suggests that the online food environment in Malaysia are perceived as unhealthy. Future studies can explore the online food environment particularly its impact on community health and well-being. Public health professionals and policymakers need to address the online food environment issues as part of the obesogenic food environment in Malaysia especially when OFD is one of the most convenient service in this country.
这项回顾性横断面研究旨在探究马来西亚公立大学学生对在线食品配送应用程序(OFD应用程序)中健康食品可得性的认知,以及这种认知与他们食物选择之间的关联。通过雪球抽样法,从马来西亚20所公立大学招募了290名年龄在19至29岁之间的受试者。数据通过在线问卷收集,问卷内容包括社会人口统计学状况、OFD应用程序的使用情况(最常使用的品牌、使用频率、食物选择和每次交易的支出)、影响OFD应用程序中食物选择的因素、消费者对OFD应用程序中健康食品可得性的认知以及改进建议。受试者中最常使用的应用程序是Food Panda(46.6%),然而,本研究中的大多数受试者(41.4%)很少使用OFD应用程序。此外,大多数受试者订购不健康食品(77.6%),每次交易花费高达15至19林吉特(43.1%)。OFD应用程序的使用与性别之间没有显著差异(>0.05)。在五个食物选择动机中,“价格和便利性”动机是OFD应用程序中影响食物选择的最主要因素。大多数受试者(76.9%)对OFD应用程序中健康食品的可得性(健康食品的种类、价格和质量)持负面看法。在本研究的受试者中,未发现消费者对OFD应用程序中健康食品可得性的认知与他们在OFD应用程序中做出的食物选择之间存在显著关联(>0.05)。此外,大多数(85.9%)受访者表示,如果有选择,他们渴望通过OFD应用程序购买健康食品。然而,大多数马来西亚公立大学学生认为OFD应用程序中健康食品的种类不多、质量好且价格实惠。这一发现表明,马来西亚的在线食品环境被认为是不健康的。未来的研究可以探索在线食品环境,特别是其对社区健康和福祉的影响。公共卫生专业人员和政策制定者需要将在线食品环境问题作为马来西亚致肥胖食品环境的一部分加以解决,尤其是当OFD是该国最便捷的服务之一时。