• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

血管内注射阿替普酶与支架取栓中的初次通过效应相关,但与 ADAPT 血栓切除术无关:SKIP 研究的事后分析。

Intravenous Alteplase is Associated with First Pass Effect in Stent-retriever but not ADAPT Thrombectomy : Post Hoc Analysis of the SKIP Study.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, National Hospital Organization Disaster Medical Center, Tokyo, Japan.

Department of Neurology, Nippon Medical School Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Mar;32(1):153-162. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01085-3. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

DOI:10.1007/s00062-021-01085-3
PMID:
34498093
Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the effect of alteplase, either combined with stent-retriever thrombectomy or a direct aspiration first pass technique (ADAPT), in patients with large-vessel occlusion stroke.

METHODS

This was a retrospective post hoc analysis of data from The Direct Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute LVO Stroke (SKIP) study. Patients were divided into two groups according to the first-line thrombectomy technique: stent-retriever and ADAPT. Each group was further divided into two subgroups, namely MT and MT + alteplase. The procedural outcomes, such as first pass effect (FPE) ratio and number of passes, were evaluated. The clinical outcomes included mRS score at 3 months.

RESULTS

A total of 180 patients were included (116 in the stent-retriever group and 64 in the ADAPT group). No interaction was detected between the first-line technique and alteplase administration. In the stent-retriever group, after adjusting for factors associated with FPE, the adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval) of FPE of the MT + alteplase subgroup versus the MT subgroup was 3.57 (1.5-8.48) and in the ADAPT group it was 1.35 (0.37-4.91). With alteplase, the number of passes decreased with adjusted odds ratios of 0.59 (0.37-0.93) in the stent-retriever group but not in the ADAPT group. In both first-line technique groups, clinical outcomes did not differ between subgroups.

CONCLUSION

In the SKIP study, alteplase administration was associated with increased FPE when combined with stent-retriever thrombectomy, but not with ADAPT. We found no differences in the clinical outcomes.

摘要

目的

研究阿替普酶联合支架取栓术或直接抽吸首过技术(ADAPT)对大血管闭塞性脑卒中患者的影响。

方法

这是一项对急性大血管闭塞性卒中直接机械取栓(SKIP)研究数据的回顾性事后分析。根据一线取栓技术将患者分为支架取栓组和 ADAPT 组。每组进一步分为支架取栓术和支架取栓术联合阿替普酶两组。评估了手术结果,如首过效应(FPE)率和通过次数。临床结局包括 3 个月时 mRS 评分。

结果

共纳入 180 例患者(支架取栓组 116 例,ADAPT 组 64 例)。未发现一线技术与阿替普酶给药之间存在交互作用。在支架取栓组中,在调整与 FPE 相关的因素后,支架取栓术联合阿替普酶组与单纯支架取栓组的 FPE 调整比值比(95%置信区间)为 3.57(1.5-8.48),而在 ADAPT 组为 1.35(0.37-4.91)。阿替普酶组中,通过次数减少,调整比值比为 0.59(0.37-0.93),而在 ADAPT 组中无此变化。在两组一线技术组中,亚组间临床结局无差异。

结论

在 SKIP 研究中,阿替普酶联合支架取栓术可增加 FPE,但与 ADAPT 联合使用则不然。我们发现临床结局无差异。

相似文献

1
Intravenous Alteplase is Associated with First Pass Effect in Stent-retriever but not ADAPT Thrombectomy : Post Hoc Analysis of the SKIP Study.血管内注射阿替普酶与支架取栓中的初次通过效应相关,但与 ADAPT 血栓切除术无关:SKIP 研究的事后分析。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2022 Mar;32(1):153-162. doi: 10.1007/s00062-021-01085-3. Epub 2021 Sep 8.
2
Intravenous alteplase has different effects on the efficacy of aspiration and stent retriever thrombectomy: analysis of the COMPASS trial.静脉内阿替普酶对抽吸和支架取栓血栓切除术的疗效有不同影响:COMPASS 试验分析。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2022 Oct;14(10):992-996. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2021-017943. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
3
Impact of Stent Retriever Size on Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes in the STRATIS Stroke Thrombectomy Registry.支架取栓器尺寸对 STRATIS 卒中取栓登记研究中临床和血管造影结局的影响。
Stroke. 2019 Feb;50(2):441-447. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.022987.
4
Effect of Intravenous Alteplase Treatment on First-Line Stent Retriever Versus Aspiration Alone During Endovascular Treatment.血管内治疗中,与单纯抽吸血栓相比,静脉内使用阿替普酶对第一代支架取栓器的影响。
Stroke. 2022 Nov;53(11):3278-3288. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.121.038390. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
5
First-Pass Effect in M1-Occlusion Stroke Patients Treated with Combined Stent-Retriever/Large-Bore Distal Aspiration Catheter Thrombectomy.支架取栓/大腔远端抽吸导管联合血栓切除术治疗 M1 闭塞性脑卒中患者的首次通过效应。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2023 Sep;33(3):701-708. doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01264-4. Epub 2023 Mar 1.
6
'Real-world' comparison of first-line direct aspiration and stent retriever mechanical thrombectomy for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke in the anterior circulation: a multicenter international retrospective study.真实世界中直接抽吸与支架取栓机械取栓治疗前循环急性缺血性脑卒中的一线治疗比较:一项多中心国际回顾性研究。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Oct;11(10):957-963. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014624. Epub 2019 Apr 11.
7
SWIFT DIRECT: Solitaire™ With the Intention For Thrombectomy Plus Intravenous t-PA Versus DIRECT Solitaire™ Stent-retriever Thrombectomy in Acute Anterior Circulation Stroke: Methodology of a randomized, controlled, multicentre study.SWIFT DIRECT 研究:急性前循环卒中血管内治疗中 Solitaire™ WITH 取栓支架与静脉溶栓联合治疗与单纯 Solitaire™ 支架取栓的随机对照多中心研究:方法学
Int J Stroke. 2022 Jul;17(6):698-705. doi: 10.1177/17474930211048768. Epub 2021 Oct 14.
8
Stent-retriever alone vs. aspiration and stent-retriever combination in large vessel occlusion stroke: A matched analysis.单纯取栓支架与抽吸和取栓支架联合治疗大动脉闭塞性卒中的匹配分析。
Int J Stroke. 2022 Apr;17(4):465-473. doi: 10.1177/17474930211019204. Epub 2021 May 27.
9
Aspiration Thrombectomy Versus Stent-Retriever Thrombectomy for the First-Pass Therapy of Intracranial Atherosclerosis-Related Large Vessel Occlusion: A Post Hoc Analysis of The Endovascular Treatment With Versus Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Trial.颅内动脉粥样硬化相关大血管闭塞首次通过治疗的抽吸血栓切除术与支架取栓术比较:大血管闭塞性卒中患者血管内治疗联合与不联合替罗非班的事后分析
World Neurosurg. 2024 Mar;183:e366-e371. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.12.101. Epub 2023 Dec 25.
10
Aspiration thrombectomy versus stent retriever thrombectomy as first-line approach for large vessel occlusion (COMPASS): a multicentre, randomised, open label, blinded outcome, non-inferiority trial.抽吸血栓切除术与支架取栓术作为血管内治疗大动脉闭塞(COMPASS)的一线治疗方法:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、盲法结局、非劣效性试验。
Lancet. 2019 Mar 9;393(10175):998-1008. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30297-1.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Intravenous Tirofiban Versus Placebo on First-Pass Successful Reperfusion in Endovascular Stroke Thrombectomy: Insights From the RESCUE BT Randomized Clinical Trial.血管内血栓切除术治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者中静脉注射替罗非班与安慰剂对首次再通效果的影响:来自 RESCUE BT 随机临床试验的见解。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2024 Nov 5;13(21):e036350. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.036350. Epub 2024 Nov 4.
2
Devices and Techniques.设备与技术
J Neuroendovasc Ther. 2023;17(11):257-262. doi: 10.5797/jnet.ra.2023-0054. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
3
Effect of Bridging Thrombolysis on the Efficacy of Stent Retriever Thrombectomy Techniques : Insights from the SWIFT-DIRECT trial.

本文引用的文献

1
Number of Retrieval Attempts Rather Than Procedure Time Is Associated With Risk of Symptomatic Intracranial Hemorrhage.检索尝试次数而非手术时间与症状性颅内出血风险相关。
Stroke. 2021 May;52(5):1580-1588. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031242. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
2
Effect of Mechanical Thrombectomy Without vs With Intravenous Thrombolysis on Functional Outcome Among Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: The SKIP Randomized Clinical Trial.机械取栓与静脉溶栓治疗急性缺血性脑卒中患者功能结局的影响:SKIP 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2021 Jan 19;325(3):244-253. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23522.
3
Direct arterial damage and neurovascular unit disruption by mechanical thrombectomy in a rat stroke model.
桥接溶栓对支架取栓术技术疗效的影响:来自 SWIFT-DIRECT 试验的见解。
Clin Neuroradiol. 2024 Mar;34(1):93-103. doi: 10.1007/s00062-023-01340-9. Epub 2023 Aug 28.
4
Predictive Factors of First-Pass Effect in Patients Who Underwent Successful Endovascular Thrombectomy for Emergent Large Vessel Occlusion.接受急诊大血管闭塞成功血管内血栓切除术患者首过效应的预测因素
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2024 Jan;67(1):14-21. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2023.0072. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
机械取栓对大鼠中风模型中动脉的直接损伤和神经血管单元的破坏。
J Neurosci Res. 2020 Oct;98(10):2018-2026. doi: 10.1002/jnr.24671. Epub 2020 Jun 18.
4
Identifying the predictors of first-pass effect and its influence on clinical outcome in the setting of endovascular thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke: Results from a multicentric prospective registry.在急性缺血性脑卒中血管内血栓切除术的背景下,确定首次通过效应的预测因素及其对临床结果的影响:来自多中心前瞻性登记研究的结果。
Int J Stroke. 2021 Jan;16(1):20-28. doi: 10.1177/1747493020923051. Epub 2020 May 7.
5
Cerebral vessel anatomy as a predictor of first-pass effect in mechanical thrombectomy for emergent large-vessel occlusion.脑动脉血管解剖结构作为急性大血管闭塞机械取栓术首过效应的预测指标
J Neurosurg. 2020 Jan 24;134(2):576-584. doi: 10.3171/2019.11.JNS192673. Print 2021 Feb 1.
6
First pass effect with contact aspiration and stent retrievers in the Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) trial.接触抽吸与支架取栓器在 Aspiration versus Stent Retriever (ASTER) 试验中的初次通过效应。
J Neurointerv Surg. 2020 Apr;12(4):386-391. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2019-015215. Epub 2019 Aug 30.
7
True First-Pass Effect.真正的首次通过效应。
Stroke. 2019 Aug;50(8):2140-2146. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025148. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
First-Line Sofia Aspiration Thrombectomy Approach within the Endovascular Treatment of Ischemic Stroke Multicentric Registry: Efficacy, Safety, and Predictive Factors of Success.多中心登记研究中血管内治疗缺血性卒中的一线 Sofia 抽吸血栓切除术方法:疗效、安全性和成功的预测因素。
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2019 Jun;40(6):1006-1012. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A6074. Epub 2019 May 23.
9
Procedural approaches and angiographic signs predicting first-pass recanalization in patients treated with mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischaemic stroke.急性缺血性卒中机械取栓治疗患者首次通过再通的手术方法及血管造影征象预测
Interv Neuroradiol. 2019 Oct;25(5):491-496. doi: 10.1177/1591019919847623. Epub 2019 May 9.
10
The randomized study of endovascular therapy with versus without intravenous tissue plasminogen activator in acute stroke with ICA and M1 occlusion (SKIP study).随机研究急性颈内动脉和 M1 段闭塞性卒中血管内治疗联合与不联合静脉组织型纤溶酶原激活剂的效果(SKIP 研究)。
Int J Stroke. 2019 Oct;14(7):752-755. doi: 10.1177/1747493019840932. Epub 2019 Mar 29.