Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 31;18(17):9167. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179167.
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic is posing a global public health burden. These consequences have been shown to increase the risk of mental distress, but the underlying protective and risk factors for mental distress and trends over different waves of the pandemic are largely unknown. Furthermore, it is largely unknown how mental distress is associated with individual protective behavior. Three quota samples, weighted to represent the population forming the German COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring study (24 March and 26 May 2020, and 9 March 2021 with >900 subjects each), were used to describe the course of mental distress and resilience, to identify risk and protective factors during the pandemic, and to investigate their associations with individual protective behaviors. Mental distress increased slightly during the pandemic. Usage of cognitive reappraisal strategies, maintenance of a daily structure, and usage of alternative social interactions decreased. Self-reported resilience, cognitive reappraisal strategies, and maintaining a daily structure were the most important protective factors in all three samples. Adherence to individual protective behaviors (e.g., physical distancing) was negatively associated with mental distress and positively associated with frequency of information intake, maintenance of a daily structure, and cognitive reappraisal. Maintaining a daily structure, training of cognitive reappraisal strategies, and information provision may be targets to prevent mental distress while assuring a high degree of individual protective behaviors during the COVID-19 pandemic. Effects of the respective interventions have to be confirmed in further studies.
严重急性呼吸系统综合症冠状病毒 2 型(SARS-CoV-2)大流行正在对全球公共卫生造成负担。这些后果已被证明会增加精神困扰的风险,但精神困扰的潜在保护和风险因素以及大流行不同阶段的趋势在很大程度上尚不清楚。此外,精神困扰与个人保护行为之间的关联在很大程度上尚不清楚。使用了三个配额样本,这些样本经过加权以代表形成德国 COVID-19 快照监测研究的人群(2020 年 3 月 24 日和 5 月 26 日,以及 2021 年 3 月 9 日,每个样本均有>900 名受试者),以描述精神困扰和恢复力的过程,确定大流行期间的风险和保护因素,并调查它们与个人保护行为的关联。精神困扰在大流行期间略有增加。认知重评策略的使用、日常结构的维持以及替代社交互动的使用减少了。自我报告的恢复力、认知重评策略和维持日常结构是所有三个样本中最重要的保护因素。个人保护行为的遵守(例如,保持社交距离)与精神困扰呈负相关,与信息摄入频率、维持日常结构和认知重评呈正相关。维持日常结构、训练认知重评策略和提供信息可能是预防 COVID-19 大流行期间精神困扰的目标,同时确保个人保护行为的高度。还需要在进一步的研究中确认各个干预措施的效果。