• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

微创与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺和壶腹周围肿瘤的比较(DIPLOMA-2):一项国际多中心、患者盲法、随机对照临床试验的研究方案。

Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Istituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, 25123, Italy.

Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

Trials. 2023 Oct 12;24(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07657-7.

DOI:10.1186/s13063-023-07657-7
PMID:37828593
原文链接:
https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10571285/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) aims to reduce the negative impact of surgery as compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) and is increasingly becoming part of clinical practice for selected patients worldwide. However, the safety of MIPD remains a topic of debate and the potential shorter time to functional recovery needs to be confirmed. To guide safe implementation of MIPD, large-scale international randomized trials comparing MIPD and OPD in experienced high-volume centers are needed. We hypothesize that MIPD is non-inferior in terms of overall complications, but superior regarding time to functional recovery, as compared to OPD.

METHODS/DESIGN: The DIPLOMA-2 trial is an international randomized controlled, patient-blinded, non-inferiority trial performed in 14 high-volume pancreatic centers in Europe with a minimum annual volume of 30 MIPD and 30 OPD. A total of 288 patients with an indication for elective pancreatoduodenectomy for pre-malignant and malignant disease, eligible for both open and minimally invasive approach, are randomly allocated for MIPD or OPD in a 2:1 ratio. Centers perform either laparoscopic or robot-assisted MIPD based on their surgical expertise. The primary outcome is the Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI®), measuring all complications graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification up to 90 days after surgery. The sample size is calculated with the following assumptions: 2.5% one-sided significance level (α), 80% power (1-β), expected difference of the mean CCI® score of 0 points between MIPD and OPD, and a non-inferiority margin of 7.5 points. The main secondary outcome is time to functional recovery, which will be analyzed for superiority. Other secondary outcomes include post-operative 90-day Fitbit™ measured activity, operative outcomes (e.g., blood loss, operative time, conversion to open surgery, surgeon-reported outcomes), oncological findings in case of malignancy (e.g., R0-resection rate, time to adjuvant treatment, survival), postoperative outcomes (e.g., clinically relevant complications), healthcare resource utilization (length of stay, readmissions, intensive care stay), quality of life, and costs. Postoperative follow-up is up to 36 months.

DISCUSSION

The DIPLOMA-2 trial aims to establish the safety of MIPD as the new standard of care for this selected patient population undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy in high-volume centers, ultimately aiming for superior patient recovery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN27483786. Registered on August 2, 2023.

摘要

背景

微创胰十二指肠切除术(MIPD)旨在减轻手术对患者的负面影响,与开腹胰十二指肠切除术(OPD)相比,它在全球范围内越来越多地成为某些患者的临床选择。然而,MIPD 的安全性仍是一个争议话题,其潜在的功能恢复时间更短仍有待证实。为了安全实施 MIPD,需要在经验丰富的高容量中心进行大规模的国际随机试验,比较 MIPD 和 OPD。我们假设与 OPD 相比,MIPD 在总体并发症方面无差异,但在功能恢复时间方面更具优势。

方法/设计:DIPLOMA-2 试验是一项在欧洲 14 个高容量胰腺中心进行的国际随机对照、患者盲法、非劣效性试验,这些中心每年至少进行 30 例 MIPD 和 30 例 OPD。共有 288 例患有恶性和良性疾病的患者需要进行择期胰十二指肠切除术,这些患者适合开放和微创方法,按照 2:1 的比例随机分配接受 MIPD 或 OPD。中心根据手术专业知识进行腹腔镜或机器人辅助 MIPD。主要结局是综合并发症指数(CCI®),测量术后 90 天内根据 Clavien-Dindo 分级的所有并发症。根据以下假设计算样本量:单侧 2.5%显著性水平(α),80%功效(1-β),MIPD 和 OPD 之间预期 CCI®评分均值差值为 0 点,非劣效性边界为 7.5 点。主要次要结局是功能恢复时间,将分析其优越性。其他次要结局包括术后 90 天 Fitbit™测量的活动、手术结果(如出血量、手术时间、转为开腹手术、外科医生报告的结果)、恶性肿瘤的肿瘤学发现(如 R0 切除率、辅助治疗时间、生存率)、术后结果(如临床相关并发症)、医疗资源利用(住院时间、再入院、重症监护停留时间)、生活质量和成本。术后随访时间长达 36 个月。

讨论

DIPLOMA-2 试验旨在确定 MIPD 的安全性,作为高容量中心接受胰十二指肠切除术的这一选定患者群体的新护理标准,最终旨在实现患者更好的康复。

试验注册

ISRCTN27483786。于 2023 年 8 月 2 日注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680f/10571285/b9437ce271ea/13063_2023_7657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680f/10571285/994dd9e9d1d7/13063_2023_7657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680f/10571285/b9437ce271ea/13063_2023_7657_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680f/10571285/994dd9e9d1d7/13063_2023_7657_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/680f/10571285/b9437ce271ea/13063_2023_7657_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic and peri-ampullary neoplasm (DIPLOMA-2): study protocol for an international multicenter patient-blinded randomized controlled trial.微创与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺和壶腹周围肿瘤的比较(DIPLOMA-2):一项国际多中心、患者盲法、随机对照临床试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2023 Oct 12;24(1):665. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07657-7.
2
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.微创与开放胰十二指肠切除术(LEOPARD-2):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jan 3;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2423-4.
3
Minimally invasive versus open distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.微创与开腹胰体尾切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌(DIPLOMA):一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Sep 9;22(1):608. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05506-z.
4
The experience of the minimally invasive (MI) fellowship-trained (FT) hepatic-pancreatic and biliary (HPB) surgeon: could the outcome of MI pancreatoduodenectomy for peri-ampullary tumors be better than open?微创(MI) fellowship 培训(FT)的肝胰和肝胆(HPB)外科医生的经验:经 MI 胰十二指肠切除术治疗壶腹周围肿瘤的结果是否优于开放手术?
Surg Endosc. 2021 Sep;35(9):5256-5267. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-08118-x. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
5
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Individual patient data meta-analysis of randomized trials.微创与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰导管腺癌的比较:随机试验的个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2023 Aug;49(8):1351-1361. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.03.227. Epub 2023 Apr 7.
6
The clinical implication of minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for non-pancreatic periampullary cancer: a systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis.微创与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗非胰腺壶腹周围癌的临床意义:系统评价和个体患者数据分析荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Aug 15;408(1):311. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03047-4.
7
Robotic versus Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Pancreatic and Periampullary Tumors (PORTAL): a study protocol for a multicenter phase III non-inferiority randomized controlled trial.机器人与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺和壶腹周围肿瘤(PORTAL):一项多中心 III 期非劣效性随机对照临床试验研究方案。
Trials. 2021 Dec 27;22(1):954. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05939-6.
8
Perioperative and oncologic outcome of robot-assisted minimally invasive (hybrid laparoscopic and robotic) pancreatoduodenectomy: based on pancreatic fistula risk score and cancer/staging matched comparison with open pancreatoduodenectomy.机器人辅助微创(杂交腹腔镜和机器人)胰十二指肠切除术的围手术期和肿瘤学结果:基于胰瘘风险评分和癌症/分期匹配与开放胰十二指肠切除术的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Apr;35(4):1675-1681. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07551-2. Epub 2020 Apr 10.
9
Long-term Outcomes After Laparoscopic, Robotic, and Open Pancreatoduodenectomy for Distal Cholangiocarcinoma: An International Propensity Score-matched Cohort Study.腹腔镜、机器人和开放胰十二指肠切除术治疗远端胆管癌的长期结果:一项国际倾向评分匹配队列研究。
Ann Surg. 2023 Sep 1;278(3):e570-e579. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005743. Epub 2022 Nov 1.
10
Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy is associated with lower morbidity compared to open pancreatoduodenectomy: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and high-quality nonrandomized studies.与开放性胰十二指肠切除术相比,微创胰十二指肠切除术的发病率更低:一项对随机对照试验和高质量非随机研究的最新荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Aug;98(32):e16730. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000016730.

引用本文的文献

1
Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy Compared to Open Pancreatoduodenectomy in Patients With Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review.胰腺癌患者中微创胰十二指肠切除术与开放胰十二指肠切除术的比较:一项系统评价
Cureus. 2025 Aug 2;17(8):e89264. doi: 10.7759/cureus.89264. eCollection 2025 Aug.
2
Managing a Replaced Right Hepatic Artery During Robot-Assisted Pancreatoduodenectomy in Practical Steps.机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术中处理替代右肝动脉的实用步骤
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 30. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17662-6.
3
Approaches in treating infiltrative common bile duct cancer: the potential of robotic hepatopancreatoduodenectomy.

本文引用的文献

1
Nationwide validation of the ISGPS risk classification for postoperative pancreatic fistula after pancreatoduodenectomy: "Less is more".胰十二指肠切除术后国际胰腺外科研究小组(ISGPS)术后胰瘘风险分类的全国性验证:“少即是多”
Surgery. 2023 May;173(5):1248-1253. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.01.004. Epub 2023 Feb 28.
2
Laparoscopic versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic or periampullary tumours: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜与开腹胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺或壶腹周围肿瘤:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验。
Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jun;6(6):438-447. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(21)00054-6. Epub 2021 Apr 27.
3
浸润性胆总管癌的治疗方法:机器人肝胰十二指肠切除术的潜力
J Minim Invasive Surg. 2025 Jun 15;28(2):103-107. doi: 10.7602/jmis.2025.28.2.103.
4
The Landmark Series: Minimally Invasive Pancreatic Resection for Ductal Adenocarcinoma, Updates, Trends, and Future Considerations.里程碑系列:导管腺癌的微创胰腺切除术、进展、趋势及未来考量
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 Jun 7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17483-7.
5
Standard versus Pre-emptive Antibiotic Treatment to Reduce the Rate of Infectious Outcomes after Whipple resection (SPARROW): a study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial.标准治疗与预防性抗生素治疗降低Whipple术后感染发生率(SPARROW):一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2025 Mar 13;26(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08574-z.
6
ASO Author Reflections: The Robotic Evolution-Transforming Pancreatic Surgery.《美国外科医师学会杂志》作者思考:机器人技术的发展——变革胰腺手术
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May;32(5):3623-3624. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-17061-x. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
7
Minimal Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Metanalysis of Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials.微创胰十二指肠切除术:随机对照临床试验的综合系统评价与荟萃分析
Ann Surg Oncol. 2025 May;32(5):3614-3622. doi: 10.1245/s10434-025-16990-x. Epub 2025 Feb 12.
8
Perioperative outcomes of robotic vs laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.机器人辅助与腹腔镜胰十二指肠切除术的围手术期结局:一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
Surg Endosc. 2025 Mar;39(3):1462-1472. doi: 10.1007/s00464-024-11515-1. Epub 2025 Jan 29.
9
Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Pancreatic Head Tumour: A Single-Centre Analysis.机器人辅助胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰头肿瘤:单中心分析
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 20;16(24):4243. doi: 10.3390/cancers16244243.
10
Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocol Compliance on Outcome After Pancreatic Surgery: Results From a Certified ERAS Center.手术后加速康复方案依从性对胰腺手术后结局的影响:来自一家认证的加速康复外科中心的结果
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Nov 25;5(4):e501. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000501. eCollection 2024 Dec.
A Simple Classification of Pancreatic Duct Size and Texture Predicts Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula: A classification of the International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery.
胰管大小和质地的简易分类可预测术后胰瘘:国际胰腺外科研究组的分类。
Ann Surg. 2023 Mar 1;277(3):e597-e608. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000004855. Epub 2021 Mar 12.
4
Oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted versus open pancreatoduodenectomy for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis.机器人辅助与开放胰十二指肠切除术治疗胰腺导管腺癌的肿瘤学结果:倾向评分匹配分析。
Surg Endosc. 2021 Jul;35(7):3437-3448. doi: 10.1007/s00464-020-07791-2. Epub 2020 Jul 21.
5
Safe implementation of minimally invasive pancreas resection: a systematic review.微创胰腺切除术的安全实施:系统评价。
HPB (Oxford). 2020 May;22(5):637-648. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.005. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
6
Evidence-based recommendations for blinding in surgical trials.基于证据的手术试验中盲法使用建议。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2019 May;404(3):273-284. doi: 10.1007/s00423-019-01761-6. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
7
Minimally invasive versus open pancreatoduodenectomy (LEOPARD-2): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.微创与开放胰十二指肠切除术(LEOPARD-2):一项随机对照试验的研究方案
Trials. 2018 Jan 3;19(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s13063-017-2423-4.
8
Standardizing terminology for minimally invasive pancreatic resection.规范微创胰腺切除术的术语
HPB (Oxford). 2017 Mar;19(3):182-189. doi: 10.1016/j.hpb.2017.01.006.
9
Randomized clinical trial of open versus laparoscopic left lateral hepatic sectionectomy within an enhanced recovery after surgery programme (ORANGE II study).开放与腹腔镜左半肝切除术在加速康复外科方案中的随机临床试验(ORANGE II 研究)。
Br J Surg. 2017 Apr;104(5):525-535. doi: 10.1002/bjs.10438. Epub 2017 Jan 31.
10
The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After.国际研究小组(ISGPS)术后胰瘘定义与分级的2016年更新:11年后
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2016.11.014. Epub 2016 Dec 28.