Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Nat Med. 2021 Nov;27(11):2012-2024. doi: 10.1038/s41591-021-01488-2. Epub 2021 Sep 9.
The efficacy of convalescent plasma for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is unclear. Although most randomized controlled trials have shown negative results, uncontrolled studies have suggested that the antibody content could influence patient outcomes. We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial of convalescent plasma for adults with COVID-19 receiving oxygen within 12 d of respiratory symptom onset ( NCT04348656 ). Patients were allocated 2:1 to 500 ml of convalescent plasma or standard of care. The composite primary outcome was intubation or death by 30 d. Exploratory analyses of the effect of convalescent plasma antibodies on the primary outcome was assessed by logistic regression. The trial was terminated at 78% of planned enrollment after meeting stopping criteria for futility. In total, 940 patients were randomized, and 921 patients were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Intubation or death occurred in 199/614 (32.4%) patients in the convalescent plasma arm and 86/307 (28.0%) patients in the standard of care arm-relative risk (RR) = 1.16 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.94-1.43, P = 0.18). Patients in the convalescent plasma arm had more serious adverse events (33.4% versus 26.4%; RR = 1.27, 95% CI 1.02-1.57, P = 0.034). The antibody content significantly modulated the therapeutic effect of convalescent plasma. In multivariate analysis, each standardized log increase in neutralization or antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity independently reduced the potential harmful effect of plasma (odds ratio (OR) = 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.95 and OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.50-0.87, respectively), whereas IgG against the full transmembrane spike protein increased it (OR = 1.53, 95% CI 1.14-2.05). Convalescent plasma did not reduce the risk of intubation or death at 30 d in hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Transfusion of convalescent plasma with unfavorable antibody profiles could be associated with worse clinical outcomes compared to standard care.
恢复期血浆治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的疗效尚不清楚。尽管大多数随机对照试验均显示阴性结果,但非对照研究表明,抗体含量可能会影响患者的结局。我们对 COVID-19 住院患者在呼吸症状出现后 12 天内接受氧疗的患者进行了一项开放性、随机对照试验,使用恢复期血浆(NCT04348656)。患者按 2:1 随机分配接受 500ml 恢复期血浆或标准治疗。复合主要结局是 30 天内插管或死亡。通过逻辑回归评估恢复期血浆抗体对主要结局的影响的探索性分析。根据无效性停止标准,在计划入组的 78%时终止了试验。共有 940 例患者接受了随机分组,921 例患者纳入意向治疗分析。在恢复期血浆组中,199/614(32.4%)例患者发生插管或死亡,在标准治疗组中,86/307(28.0%)例患者发生插管或死亡-相对风险(RR)=1.16(95%置信区间(CI)为 0.94-1.43,P=0.18)。恢复期血浆组的不良事件更为严重(33.4%比 26.4%;RR=1.27,95%CI 1.02-1.57,P=0.034)。抗体含量显著调节了恢复期血浆的治疗效果。在多变量分析中,中和或抗体依赖性细胞毒性的每一个标准化对数增加独立降低了血浆的潜在有害作用(比值比(OR)=0.74,95%CI 0.57-0.95 和 OR=0.66,95%CI 0.50-0.87),而针对全长跨膜刺突蛋白的 IgG 增加了这种作用(OR=1.53,95%CI 1.14-2.05)。在 COVID-19 住院患者中,恢复期血浆并未降低 30 天内插管或死亡的风险。与标准治疗相比,输注具有不利抗体谱的恢复期血浆可能与更差的临床结局相关。