Das Indra J, Compton Julia J, Bajaj Amishi, Johnstone Peter A
Department of Radiation Oncology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
Hancock Regional Hospital, Sue Ann Wortman Cancer Center, 801 N State St, Greenfield, IN 46410, USA.
J Radiat Res. 2021 Sep 9. doi: 10.1093/jrr/rrab080.
Reduction in setup errors is advocated through daily imaging and adaptive therapy, where the target volume is drawn daily. Previous studies suggest that inter-physician volume variation is significant (1.5 cm standard deviation [SD]); however, there are limited data for intra-physician consistency in daily target volume delineation, which is investigated in this study. Seven patients with lung cancer were chosen based on the perceived difficulty of contouring their disease, varying from simple parenchymal lung nodules to lesions with extensive adjacent atelectasis. Four physicians delineated the gross tumor volume (GTV) for each patient on 10 separate days to see the intra- and inter-physician contouring. Isocenter coordinates (x, y and z), target volume (cm3), and largest dimensions on anterior-posterior (AP) and lateral views were recorded for each GTV. Our results show that the variability among the physicians was reflected by target volumes ranging from +109% to -86% from the mean while isocenter coordinate changes were minimal; 3.8, 1.7 and 1.9 mm for x, y and z coordinates, respectively. The orthogonal image (AP and lateral) change varied 16.3 mm and 15.0 mm respectively among days and physicians. We conclude than when performing daily imaging, random variability in contouring resulted in isocenter changes up to ±3.8 mm in our study. The shape of the target varied within ±16 mm. This study suggests that when using daily imaging to track isocenter, target volume, or treatment parameters, physicians should be aware of personal variability when considering margins added to the target volume in daily decision making especially for difficult cases.
通过每日成像和自适应治疗来减少摆位误差,其中每日勾画靶区体积。先前的研究表明,不同医生之间的靶区体积差异显著(标准差[SD]为1.5厘米);然而,关于医生在每日靶区体积勾画中的内部一致性数据有限,本研究对此进行了调查。基于对勾画疾病轮廓难度的感知,选择了7例肺癌患者,其疾病从简单的肺实质结节到伴有广泛相邻肺不张的病变不等。4位医生在10个不同日期为每位患者勾画大体肿瘤体积(GTV),以观察医生内部和医生之间的轮廓勾画情况。记录每个GTV的等中心坐标(x、y和z)、靶区体积(立方厘米)以及前后位(AP)和侧位视图上的最大尺寸。我们的结果表明,医生之间的变异性体现在靶区体积相对于平均值的变化范围为+109%至-86%,而异中心坐标变化最小;x、y和z坐标分别为3.8毫米、1.7毫米和1.9毫米。不同日期和医生之间,正交图像(AP和侧位)变化分别为16.3毫米和15.0毫米。我们得出结论,在本研究中,进行每日成像时,轮廓勾画中的随机变异性导致等中心变化高达±3.8毫米。靶区形状在±16毫米范围内变化。本研究表明,当使用每日成像来跟踪等中心、靶区体积或治疗参数时,医生在每日决策中考虑添加到靶区体积的边界时,尤其是对于困难病例,应意识到个人变异性。