Heuristic scoring method utilizing FDG-PET statistical parametric mapping in the evaluation of suspected Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration.

Distinguishing frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) and Alzheimer Disease (AD) on FDG-PET based on qualitative review alone can pose a diagnostic challenge. SPM has been shown to improve diagnostic performance in research settings, but translation to clinical practice has been lacking. Our purpose was to create a heuristic scoring method based on statistical parametric mapping z-scores. We aimed to compare the performance of the scoring method to the initial qualitative read and a machine learning (ML)-based method as benchmarks. FDG-PET/CT or PET/MRI of 65 patients with suspected dementia were processed using SPM software, yielding z-scores from either whole brain (W) or cerebellar (C) normalization relative to a healthy cohort. A non-ML, heuristic scoring system was applied using region counts below a preset z-score cutoff. W z-scores, C z-scores, or WC z-scores (z-scores from both W and C normalization) served as features to build random forest models. The neurological diagnosis was used as the gold standard. The sensitivity of the non-ML scoring system and the random forest models to detect AD was higher than the initial qualitative read of the standard FDG-PET [0.89-1.00 vs. 0.22 (95% CI, 0-0.33)]. A categorical random forest model to distinguish AD, FTLD, and normal cases had similar accuracy than the non-ML scoring model (0.63 vs. 0.61). Our non-ML-based scoring system of SPM z-scores approximated the diagnostic performance of a ML-based method and demonstrated higher sensitivity in the detection of AD compared to qualitative reads. This approach may improve the diagnostic performance.