• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在缅甸进行文化适应的 HIV 污名量表的适应和验证。

Adaptation and validation of a culturally adapted HIV stigma scale in Myanmar.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

School of Nursing, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 13;21(1):1663. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11685-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-11685-w
PMID:34517850
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8439000/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

HIV stigma is a common barrier to HIV prevention, testing, and treatment adherence, especially for low- and middle-income countries such as Myanmar. However, there was no validated Myanmar version of a stigma scale. Therefore, we adapted the English version of the 40-item Berger's HIV stigma scale and the 7-item Indian HIV stigma scale into a 47-item Myanmar HIV stigma scale and then evaluated the scale's psychometric properties.

METHOD

From January 2020 to May 2020, using random sampling methods, 216 eligible Myanmar people living with HIV/AIDS (PLWHA) were contacted from a closed Facebook group that included more than 10,000 PLWHA. A sample of 156 Myanmar PLWHA completed the online self-reported survey.

RESULTS

A six-factor structure for the scale was determined through exploratory factor analysis, explaining 68.23% of the total variance. After deleting 12 items, the 35-item HIV stigma scale achieved Cronbach 's α of 0.72 to 0.95. Construct validity of the scale was demonstrated by significant association with self-reported depression and social support levels (r = 0.60, and - 0.77, p < 0.01). In Rasch analysis, the scale achieved person reliability of 3.40 and 1.53 and a separation index of 0.92 and 0.70. The infit and outfit mean squares for each item ranged from 0.68 to 1.40. No differential item functioning across gender or educational level was found.

CONCLUSIONS

The psychometric properties of the 35-item Myanmar version of the HIV stigma scale support it as a measure of stigma among PLWHA in Myanmar. This instrument could help healthcare providers to better understand how stigma operates in PLWHA and to develop tailored stigma-reduction interventions in Myanmar.

摘要

背景

艾滋病毒污名是艾滋病毒预防、检测和治疗依从性的常见障碍,尤其是在缅甸等中低收入国家。然而,目前还没有经过验证的缅甸版污名量表。因此,我们将英语版的 40 项 Berger 的艾滋病毒污名量表和 7 项印度艾滋病毒污名量表改编成 47 项缅甸艾滋病毒污名量表,然后评估了该量表的心理测量特性。

方法

2020 年 1 月至 5 月,我们采用随机抽样方法,从一个拥有超过 10000 名艾滋病毒感染者/艾滋病患者(PLWHA)的封闭脸书小组中联系了 216 名符合条件的缅甸 PLWHA。有 156 名缅甸 PLWHA 完成了在线自我报告调查。

结果

通过探索性因素分析确定了量表的六因素结构,解释了总方差的 68.23%。删除 12 个项目后,35 项艾滋病毒污名量表的 Cronbach 's α 为 0.72 至 0.95。该量表与自我报告的抑郁和社会支持水平显著相关(r=0.60 和-0.77,p<0.01),证明了其结构效度。在 Rasch 分析中,该量表的个人可靠性为 3.40 和 1.53,分离指数为 0.92 和 0.70。每个项目的 infit 和 outfit 均方根范围为 0.68 至 1.40。未发现性别或教育水平上的差异项目功能。

结论

35 项缅甸版艾滋病毒污名量表具有良好的心理测量特性,可作为衡量缅甸 PLWHA 污名程度的工具。该工具可以帮助医疗保健提供者更好地了解污名在 PLWHA 中的运作方式,并在缅甸制定有针对性的减少污名干预措施。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336f/8439000/41fe7cddc28b/12889_2021_11685_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336f/8439000/41fe7cddc28b/12889_2021_11685_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/336f/8439000/41fe7cddc28b/12889_2021_11685_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Adaptation and validation of a culturally adapted HIV stigma scale in Myanmar.在缅甸进行文化适应的 HIV 污名量表的适应和验证。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 13;21(1):1663. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11685-w.
2
Adaptation and Validation of the Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) in People Living with HIV in Myanmar.认知与情感正念量表修订版(CAMS-R)在缅甸艾滋病病毒感染者中的适应性与效度验证
Mindfulness (N Y). 2022;13(1):188-197. doi: 10.1007/s12671-021-01784-5. Epub 2021 Nov 9.
3
Development of an 18-item abbreviated Chinese version of Berger's HIV Stigma Scale.伯杰HIV耻辱量表18项中文简版的编制
Int J Nurs Pract. 2019 Apr;25(2):e12708. doi: 10.1111/ijn.12708. Epub 2018 Nov 6.
4
Psychometric Evaluation of a Myanmar Version of the Perceived Stress Scale for People Living with HIV/AIDS.用于 HIV/AIDS 感染者的中文版感知压力量表的心理计量学评估。
J Nurs Meas. 2022 Dec 1;30(4):603-626. doi: 10.1891/JNM-D-21-00013.
5
Translation and validation of the Short HIV Stigma scale in Brazilian Portuguese.巴西葡萄牙语版短版 HIV 耻辱量表的翻译与验证。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020 Oct 2;18(1):322. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-01571-1.
6
Translation, Adaption, and Psychometric Testing of the Myanmar Version of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey for People Living With HIV/AIDS.针对感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的医学结局研究社会支持调查问卷缅甸语版本的翻译、改编及心理测量测试。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 7;12:707142. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.707142. eCollection 2021.
7
Development of a 12-item short version of the HIV stigma scale.一份包含12个条目的HIV污名量表简版的编制。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 30;15(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0691-z.
8
Validity, reliability, and measurement invariance of an adapted short version of the HIV stigma scale among perinatally HIV infected adolescents at the Kenyan coast.肯尼亚沿海地区围产期感染 HIV 的青少年使用 HIV 耻辱感量表短版适应版的有效性、信度和测量不变性。
Glob Health Res Policy. 2021 Dec 10;6(1):49. doi: 10.1186/s41256-021-00229-9.
9
Validation of a modified Berger HIV stigma scale for use among patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.验证改良的 Berger HIV 耻辱量表在丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染患者中的适用性。
PLoS One. 2020 Feb 5;15(2):e0228471. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228471. eCollection 2020.
10
COVID-19-related stigma among infected people in Sweden; psychometric properties and levels of stigma in two cohorts as measured by a COVID-19 stigma scale.瑞典受感染人群中的 COVID-19 相关污名;通过 COVID-19 污名量表测量的两个队列中受感染人群的污名的心理测量特性和水平。
PLoS One. 2023 Jun 21;18(6):e0287341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287341. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Measuring Stigma in Pediatric Oncology: A Cross-Sectional Analysis of Three Global Sites.测量儿科肿瘤学中的耻辱感:对三个全球地点的横断面分析。
JCO Glob Oncol. 2025 Jan;11:e2400213. doi: 10.1200/GO.24.00213. Epub 2025 Jan 8.
2
Psychometric properties of stigma and discrimination measurement tools for persons living with HIV: a systematic review using the COSMIN methodology.艾滋病毒感染者耻辱感和歧视测量工具的心理测量学特性:使用 COSMIN 方法的系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Apr 27;13(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02535-y.
3
Can social support mediate stigma and perceived stress in people live with human immunodeficiency virus?

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of peer-to-peer HIV counseling in Myanmar: a measure of knowledge, adherence, and barriers.评价缅甸的同伴艾滋病咨询:知识、坚持和障碍的衡量标准。
AIDS Care. 2022 Jun;34(6):762-770. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2021.1902929. Epub 2021 Mar 21.
2
Assessing depressive symptoms among people living with HIV in Yangon city, Myanmar: Does being a member of self-help group matter?评估缅甸仰光市 HIV 感染者的抑郁症状:参加自助小组是否重要?
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 18;16(3):e0248807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248807. eCollection 2021.
3
Differential item functioning for items in Berger's HIV Stigma Scale: an analysis of cohorts from the Indian, Swedish, and US contexts.
社会支持能否在感染人类免疫缺陷病毒的人群中缓解污名化和感知到的压力?
AIDS Care. 2024 Feb;36(2):255-262. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2023.2254545. Epub 2023 Sep 6.
4
The Mediating Effects of Mindfulness on Perceived Stress From HIV Stigma in People Living With HIV in Myanmar: A Cross-sectional Study.缅甸 HIV 感染者的 HIV 污名化感知压力与正念的中介作用:一项横断面研究。
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2022;33(5):559-566. doi: 10.1097/JNC.0000000000000352. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
伯杰艾滋病污名量表项目的差异项目功能:对来自印度、瑞典和美国队列的分析。
Qual Life Res. 2018 Jun;27(6):1647-1659. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1841-4. Epub 2018 Mar 24.
4
The Chinese Catquest-9SF: validation and application in community screenings.中国版猫科动物问卷-9SF:在社区筛查中的验证与应用
BMC Ophthalmol. 2018 Mar 20;18(1):77. doi: 10.1186/s12886-018-0743-0.
5
Shortened and Culturally Appropriate HIV Stigma Scale for Asians Living with HIV in the United States: Psychometric Analysis.《美国 HIV 感染者的简短且文化适宜的 HIV 耻辱感量表:心理测量学分析》。
J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care. 2018 Jul-Aug;29(4):560-569. doi: 10.1016/j.jana.2018.02.007. Epub 2018 Feb 19.
6
Development of a 12-item short version of the HIV stigma scale.一份包含12个条目的HIV污名量表简版的编制。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 May 30;15(1):115. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0691-z.
7
90-90-90-Plus: Maintaining Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapies.90-90-90加:维持对抗逆转录病毒疗法的依从性。
AIDS Patient Care STDS. 2017 May;31(5):227-236. doi: 10.1089/apc.2017.0009.
8
Non-adherence to anti-retroviral therapy among HIV infected adults in Mon State of Myanmar.缅甸孟邦感染艾滋病毒的成年人中抗逆转录病毒治疗的不依从情况。
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 5;17(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4309-5.
9
Evolution of the health sector response to HIV in Myanmar: progress, challenges and the way forward.缅甸卫生部门应对艾滋病毒的演变:进展、挑战与未来之路。
J Virus Erad. 2016 Nov 28;2(Suppl 4):20-26. doi: 10.1016/S2055-6640(20)31095-5.
10
HIV care in Yangon, Myanmar; successes, challenges and implications for policy.缅甸仰光的艾滋病病毒治疗;成效、挑战及政策影响
AIDS Res Ther. 2017 Mar 4;14(1):10. doi: 10.1186/s12981-017-0137-z.