• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The ethical-political dimension of social and community praxis: The case of Ecuador's early response to COVID-19.社会与社区实践的伦理政治维度:以厄瓜多尔对新冠疫情的早期应对为例
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):573-585. doi: 10.1002/casp.2557. Epub 2021 Jul 11.
2
Citizenship under COVID-19: An analysis of UK political rhetoric during the first wave of the 2020 pandemic.新冠疫情下的公民身份:对2020年第一波疫情期间英国政治言辞的分析
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):555-572. doi: 10.1002/casp.2526. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
3
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
4
In the name of COVID-19: legitimizing the exclusion of community participation in Ecuador's health policy.以 COVID-19 之名:使厄瓜多尔卫生政策排除社区参与具有合法性。
Health Promot Int. 2021 Oct 13;36(5):1324-1333. doi: 10.1093/heapro/daaa139.
5
Community resilience and anxiety among Chinese older adults during COVID-19: The moderating role of trust in local government.新冠疫情期间中国老年人的社区复原力与焦虑:对地方政府信任的调节作用
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):411-422. doi: 10.1002/casp.2563. Epub 2021 Jul 22.
6
A critical narrative of Ecuador's preparedness and response to the COVID-19 pandemic.关于厄瓜多尔对新冠疫情的准备与应对的批判性叙述。
Public Health Pract (Oxf). 2021 Nov;2:100127. doi: 10.1016/j.puhip.2021.100127. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
7
Health, environment and colonial legacies: Situating the science of pesticides, bananas and bodies in Ecuador.健康、环境与殖民遗产:在厄瓜多尔定位农药、香蕉与人体科学。
Soc Sci Med. 2019 Oct;239:112529. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2019.112529. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
8
The mental health benefits of community helping during crisis: Coordinated helping, community identification and sense of unity during the COVID-19 pandemic.危机期间社区互助对心理健康的益处:新冠疫情期间的协同互助、社区认同与团结感
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):521-535. doi: 10.1002/casp.2520. Epub 2021 Apr 5.
9
Science Diplomacy in Ecuador: Political Discourse and Practices Between 2007 and 2017.厄瓜多尔的科学外交:2007年至2017年期间的政治话语与实践
Front Res Metr Anal. 2021 May 11;6:656969. doi: 10.3389/frma.2021.656969. eCollection 2021.
10
Fighting inequalities in times of pandemic: The role of politicized identities and interdependent self-construal in coping with economic threat.在疫情时期对抗不平等:政治化身份认同和相互依存的自我建构在应对经济威胁中的作用。
J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 Jun 13. doi: 10.1002/casp.2632.

本文引用的文献

1
[Covid-19 in Ecuador: political fragility and vulnerability of public health].[厄瓜多尔的新冠疫情:政治脆弱性与公共卫生的易损性]
Hist Cienc Saude Manguinhos. 2021 Apr-Jun;28(2):587-591. doi: 10.1590/S0104-59702021005000003.
2
Ivermectin for the Treatment of Coronavirus Disease 2019: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.伊维菌素治疗 2019 年冠状病毒病:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Clin Infect Dis. 2022 Mar 23;74(6):1022-1029. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab591.
3
The COVID-19 vaccines rush: participatory community engagement matters more than ever.新冠疫苗接种热潮:社区参与比以往任何时候都更重要。
Lancet. 2021 Jan 2;397(10268):8-10. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32642-8. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
4
Responses to COVID-19 in five Latin American countries.拉丁美洲五个国家对新冠疫情的应对措施。
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):525-559. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
5
How coloniality shapes the making of Latin American psychologists: ethnographic evidence from Ecuador.殖民主义如何塑造拉丁美洲心理学家的形成:来自厄瓜多尔的民族志证据。
Int Rev Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;32(4):348-358. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2020.1761777. Epub 2020 Jul 10.
6
COVID-19 in context: Why do people die in emergencies? It's probably not because of collective psychology.新冠疫情背景下:为什么人们会在紧急情况下死亡?这可能不是因为集体心理。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;59(3):686-693. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12393. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
7
The health-related determinants of politics.政治的健康相关决定因素。
Lancet. 2020 May 30;395(10238):1694. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30555-9.
8
Governments cannot just 'follow the science' on COVID-19.政府在新冠疫情问题上不能仅仅“遵循科学”。
Nat Hum Behav. 2020 Jun;4(6):560. doi: 10.1038/s41562-020-0894-x.
9
COVID-19 mental-health responses neglect social realities.针对新冠疫情的心理健康应对措施忽视了社会现实。
Nature. 2020 May 4. doi: 10.1038/d41586-020-01313-9.
10
Society and the slow burn of inequality.社会与不平等的缓慢加剧
Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):1413-1414. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30940-5.

社会与社区实践的伦理政治维度:以厄瓜多尔对新冠疫情的早期应对为例

The ethical-political dimension of social and community praxis: The case of Ecuador's early response to COVID-19.

作者信息

Capella Manuel

机构信息

Faculty of Psychological Sciences University of Guayaquil Guayaquil Ecuador.

出版信息

J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):573-585. doi: 10.1002/casp.2557. Epub 2021 Jul 11.

DOI:10.1002/casp.2557
PMID:34518752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8426879/
Abstract

Around the globe, millions of people have experienced suffering and death related to COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus. In Ecuador,the painful impact of the pandemic elicited early responses by the government and by local communities. This critical, positioned and exploratory case study analyses such responses, underscoring the fundamental ethical-political dimension of any academic and professional praxis aimed at the construction of healthier societies worldwide. While critical traditions are familiar with this stance, the inequalities and ideological mechanisms made visible by COVID-19 responses may enable the wider community of researchers and practitioners to join ongoing collective ethical-political efforts. Findings from Ecuador underline the potentially harmful role of neoliberalism and issues of democratic legitimacy, significant problems before and during the pandemic shock, and official discourses, which blame communities for their own suffering and death. Neutrality and depoliticized notions of scientific evidence are notoriously insufficient in these scenarios. We need to engage more deeply with diverse forms of global and local community resistance, in times of COVID-19, and beyond. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.

摘要

在全球范围内,数百万人经历了与新冠病毒(一种由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2引起的传染病)相关的痛苦和死亡。在厄瓜多尔,疫情的惨痛影响促使政府和当地社区迅速做出反应。本关键、定位且具有探索性的案例研究分析了这些反应,强调了任何旨在构建全球更健康社会的学术和专业实践的基本伦理政治维度。虽然批判传统熟悉这种立场,但新冠疫情应对措施所暴露的不平等和意识形态机制可能会促使更广泛的研究人员和从业者群体加入正在进行的集体伦理政治努力。厄瓜多尔的研究结果突显了新自由主义的潜在有害作用以及民主合法性问题,这些是疫情冲击之前和期间的重大问题,还有官方言论,即指责社区自身造成了痛苦和死亡。在这些情况下,中立和去政治化的科学证据观念显然是不够的。在新冠疫情期间及之后,我们需要更深入地参与各种形式的全球和地方社区抵抗。请参考补充材料部分以找到本文的社区和社会影响声明。