Suppr超能文献

社会与社区实践的伦理政治维度:以厄瓜多尔对新冠疫情的早期应对为例

The ethical-political dimension of social and community praxis: The case of Ecuador's early response to COVID-19.

作者信息

Capella Manuel

机构信息

Faculty of Psychological Sciences University of Guayaquil Guayaquil Ecuador.

出版信息

J Community Appl Soc Psychol. 2022 May-Jun;32(3):573-585. doi: 10.1002/casp.2557. Epub 2021 Jul 11.

Abstract

Around the globe, millions of people have experienced suffering and death related to COVID-19, an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV2 virus. In Ecuador,the painful impact of the pandemic elicited early responses by the government and by local communities. This critical, positioned and exploratory case study analyses such responses, underscoring the fundamental ethical-political dimension of any academic and professional praxis aimed at the construction of healthier societies worldwide. While critical traditions are familiar with this stance, the inequalities and ideological mechanisms made visible by COVID-19 responses may enable the wider community of researchers and practitioners to join ongoing collective ethical-political efforts. Findings from Ecuador underline the potentially harmful role of neoliberalism and issues of democratic legitimacy, significant problems before and during the pandemic shock, and official discourses, which blame communities for their own suffering and death. Neutrality and depoliticized notions of scientific evidence are notoriously insufficient in these scenarios. We need to engage more deeply with diverse forms of global and local community resistance, in times of COVID-19, and beyond. Please refer to the Supplementary Material section to find this article's Community and Social Impact Statement.

摘要

在全球范围内,数百万人经历了与新冠病毒(一种由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2引起的传染病)相关的痛苦和死亡。在厄瓜多尔,疫情的惨痛影响促使政府和当地社区迅速做出反应。本关键、定位且具有探索性的案例研究分析了这些反应,强调了任何旨在构建全球更健康社会的学术和专业实践的基本伦理政治维度。虽然批判传统熟悉这种立场,但新冠疫情应对措施所暴露的不平等和意识形态机制可能会促使更广泛的研究人员和从业者群体加入正在进行的集体伦理政治努力。厄瓜多尔的研究结果突显了新自由主义的潜在有害作用以及民主合法性问题,这些是疫情冲击之前和期间的重大问题,还有官方言论,即指责社区自身造成了痛苦和死亡。在这些情况下,中立和去政治化的科学证据观念显然是不够的。在新冠疫情期间及之后,我们需要更深入地参与各种形式的全球和地方社区抵抗。请参考补充材料部分以找到本文的社区和社会影响声明。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

4
Responses to COVID-19 in five Latin American countries.拉丁美洲五个国家对新冠疫情的应对措施。
Health Policy Technol. 2020 Dec;9(4):525-559. doi: 10.1016/j.hlpt.2020.08.014. Epub 2020 Aug 27.
7
The health-related determinants of politics.政治的健康相关决定因素。
Lancet. 2020 May 30;395(10238):1694. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30555-9.
10
Society and the slow burn of inequality.社会与不平等的缓慢加剧
Lancet. 2020 May 2;395(10234):1413-1414. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30940-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验