Suppr超能文献

使用解释性混合方法设计理解 COVID-19 期间公众对公共卫生工作态度的种族差异。

Understanding racial differences in attitudes about public health efforts during COVID-19 using an explanatory mixed methods design.

机构信息

University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.

University of Illinois Department of Kinesiology and Community Health, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;287:114379. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114379. Epub 2021 Sep 8.

Abstract

Efforts to mitigate the spread of COVID-19 rely on trust in public health organizations and practices. These practices include contact tracing, which requires people to share personal information with public health organizations. The central role of trust in these practices has gained more attention during the pandemic, resurfacing endemic questions about public trust and potential racial trust disparities, especially as they relate to participation in public health efforts. Using an explanatory mixed methods design, we conducted quantitative analysis of state-level survey data in the United States from a representative sample of Michigan residents (n = 1000) in May 2020. We used unadjusted and adjusted linear regressions to examine differences in trust in public health information and willingness to participate in public health efforts by race. From July to September 2020, we conducted qualitative interviews (n = 26) to further explain quantitative results. Using unadjusted linear regression, we observed higher willingness to participate in COVID-19 public health efforts among Black survey respondents compared to White respondents. In adjusted analysis, that difference disappeared, yielding no statistically significant difference between Black and White respondents in either trust in public health information sources or willingness to participate. Qualitative interviews were conducted to explain these findings, considering their contrast with assumptions that Black people would exhibit lower trust in public health organizations during COVID-19. Altruism, risk acknowledgement, trust in public health organizations during COVID-19, and belief in efficacy of public health efforts contributed to willingness to participate in public health efforts among interviewees. Our findings underscore the contextual nature of trust, and the importance of this context when analyzing protective health behaviors among communities disproportionately affected by COVID-19. Assumptions about mistrust among Black individuals and communities may be inaccurate because they overlook the specific context of the public health crisis. These findings are important because they indicate that Black respondents are exhibiting strategic trust during COVID-19 despite systemic, contemporary, and historic barriers to trust. Conceptual specificity rather than blanket generalizations is warranted, especially given the harms of stereotyping and discrimination.

摘要

为了减缓 COVID-19 的传播,我们需要依赖于公众对公共卫生组织和措施的信任。这些措施包括接触者追踪,这需要人们向公共卫生组织共享个人信息。在疫情期间,公众信任和潜在的种族信任差距问题越发受到关注,这些问题凸显了信任在这些措施中的核心作用,尤其是在涉及参与公共卫生工作时。本研究采用解释性混合方法设计,对 2020 年 5 月美国密歇根州具有代表性的 1000 名居民的州级调查数据进行了定量分析。我们使用未经调整和调整后的线性回归来检验种族差异对公共卫生信息信任度和参与公共卫生工作意愿的影响。2020 年 7 月至 9 月,我们进行了 26 次定性访谈,以进一步解释定量结果。使用未经调整的线性回归,我们观察到与白人受访者相比,黑人受访者更愿意参与 COVID-19 公共卫生工作。在调整分析中,这种差异消失了,黑人受访者和白人受访者在对公共卫生信息来源的信任度或参与意愿方面没有统计学上的显著差异。进行定性访谈是为了解释这些发现,因为这些发现与在 COVID-19 期间黑人对公共卫生组织的信任度较低的假设形成了对比。访谈对象的利他主义、对风险的认识、对 COVID-19 期间公共卫生组织的信任以及对公共卫生工作效果的信任,都促成了他们参与公共卫生工作的意愿。我们的研究结果强调了信任的情境性质,以及在分析受 COVID-19 影响较大的社区的保护健康行为时,这种情境的重要性。对黑人个人和社区不信任的假设可能不准确,因为它们忽略了公共卫生危机的具体背景。这些发现很重要,因为它们表明,尽管存在系统性、当代性和历史性的信任障碍,但黑人受访者在 COVID-19 期间表现出了战略性信任。鉴于刻板印象和歧视的危害,需要进行具体概念的研究,而不是一概而论。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

3
Measuring the willingness to share personal health information: a systematic review.测量个人健康信息共享意愿:系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jul 20;11:1213615. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1213615. eCollection 2023.
4
Fifty Years of Trust Research in Health Care: A Synthetic Review.五十年来医疗保健领域信任研究综述。
Milbank Q. 2023 Mar;101(1):126-178. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12598. Epub 2023 Jan 23.

本文引用的文献

3
Disparities in Adherence to COVID-19 Public Health Recommendations.COVID-19公共卫生建议的依从性差异。
Health Lit Res Pract. 2020 Aug 6;4(3):e171-e173. doi: 10.3928/24748307-20200723-01.
4
Determinants of COVID-19 vaccine acceptance in the US.美国新冠疫苗接种意愿的影响因素
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Sep;26:100495. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100495. Epub 2020 Aug 12.
6
Assessing differential impacts of COVID-19 on black communities.评估 COVID-19 对黑人群体的差异化影响。
Ann Epidemiol. 2020 Jul;47:37-44. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2020.05.003. Epub 2020 May 14.
8
How to fight an infodemic.如何应对信息疫情。
Lancet. 2020 Feb 29;395(10225):676. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30461-X.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验