Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Helsinki, Finland
Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Turku, Finland.
Occup Environ Med. 2022 Apr;79(4):233-241. doi: 10.1136/oemed-2021-107745. Epub 2021 Sep 14.
To examine the associations of COVID-19-related changes in work with perceptions of psychosocial work environment and employee health.
In a cohort of 24 299 Finnish public sector employees, psychosocial work environment and employee well-being were assessed twice before (2016 and 2018=reference period) and once during (2020) the COVID-19 pandemic. Those who reported a change (='Exposed') in work due to the pandemic (working from home, new tasks or team reorganisation) were compared with those who did not report such change (='Non-exposed').
After adjusting for sex, age, socioeconomic status and lifestyle risk score, working from home (44%) was associated with greater increase in worktime control (standardised mean difference (SMD)=0.078, 95% CI 0.066 to 0.090; SMD=0.025, 95% CI 0.014 to 0.036), procedural justice (SMD=0.101, 95% CI 0.084 to 0.118; SMD=0.053, 95% CI 0.038 to 0.068), workplace social capital (SMD=0.094, 95% CI 0.077 to 0.110; SMD=0.034, 95% CI 0.019 to 0.048), less decline in self-rated health (SMD=-0.038, 95% CI -0.054 to -0.022; SMD=-0.081, 95% CI -0.095 to -0.067), perceived work ability (SMD=-0.091, 95% CI -0.108 to -0.074; SMD=-0.151, 95% CI -0.167 to -0.136) and less increase in psychological distress (risk ratio (RR)=1.06, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.09; RR=1.16, 95% CI 1.13 to 1.20). New tasks (6%) were associated with greater increase in psychological distress (RR=1.28, 95% CI 1.19 to 1.39; RR=1.10, 95% CI 1.07 to 1.12) and team reorganisation (5%) with slightly steeper decline in perceived work ability (SMD=-0.151 95% CI -0.203 to -0.098; SMD=-0.124, 95% CI -0.136 to -0.112).
Employees who worked from home during the pandemic had more favourable psychosocial work environment and health, whereas those who were exposed to work task changes and team reorganisations experienced more adverse changes.
探讨与 COVID-19 相关的工作变化与对心理社会工作环境和员工健康的认知之间的关系。
在一项针对 24299 名芬兰公共部门员工的队列研究中,在 COVID-19 大流行之前(2016 年和 2018 年=参考期)进行了两次心理社会工作环境和员工福祉评估,在大流行期间(在家工作、新任务或团队重组)进行了一次评估。报告因疫情而工作发生变化(='暴露')的人与未报告此类变化的人(='未暴露')进行了比较。
在校正性别、年龄、社会经济地位和生活方式风险评分后,在家工作(44%)与工作时间控制的更大增加相关(标准化均数差(SMD)=0.078,95%CI 0.066 至 0.090;SMD=0.025,95%CI 0.014 至 0.036)、程序公正(SMD=0.101,95%CI 0.084 至 0.118;SMD=0.053,95%CI 0.038 至 0.068)、工作场所社会资本(SMD=0.094,95%CI 0.077 至 0.110;SMD=0.034,95%CI 0.019 至 0.048)、自我评估健康状况下降较少(SMD=-0.038,95%CI -0.054 至 -0.022;SMD=-0.081,95%CI -0.095 至 -0.067)、感知工作能力下降较少(SMD=-0.091,95%CI -0.108 至 -0.074;SMD=-0.151,95%CI -0.167 至 -0.136)和心理困扰增加较少(风险比(RR)=1.06,95%CI 1.02 至 1.09;RR=1.16,95%CI 1.13 至 1.20)。新任务(6%)与心理困扰的更大增加相关(RR=1.28,95%CI 1.19 至 1.39;RR=1.10,95%CI 1.07 至 1.12),团队重组(5%)与感知工作能力的略微下降相关(SMD=-0.151,95%CI -0.203 至 -0.098;SMD=-0.124,95%CI -0.136 至 -0.112)。
在大流行期间在家工作的员工具有更有利的心理社会工作环境和健康状况,而那些面临工作任务变化和团队重组的员工则经历了更不利的变化。