Suppr超能文献

职业压力(KOSS®19):韩国背景下的量表开发与验证

Occupational stress (KOSS®19): scale development and validation in the Korean context.

作者信息

Song Hansoo, Kim Hyoung Ryoul, Kim Inah, Yoon Jin-Ha, Koh Sang-Baek, Oh Sung-Soo, Kang Hee-Tae, Jeung Da-Yee, Hyun Dae-Sung, Suh Chunhui, Chang Sei-Jin

机构信息

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Chosun University Hospital, Gwangju, Korea.

Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

出版信息

Ann Occup Environ Med. 2025 May;37:e12. doi: 10.35371/aoem.2025.37.e12. Epub 2025 May 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS) was developed in 2004. During this time, industrial structures have evolved, and societal awareness of occupational stress has changed. This study aims to develop and validate a revised version of the Korean Occupational Stress Scale (KOSS®19), tailored for workers, reflecting these changes.

METHODS

The KOSS®19 was developed based on the 26-item KOSS-short form (SF) through a review by eight experts. A survey was conducted including 359 service industry workers, comprising the KOSS®19, Burnout, and Depression scales. The KOSS®19 subscales were restructured, and their reliability and validity were evaluated.

RESULTS

The KOSS®19 composed of eight subscales: hazardous physical environment (2 items), high job demand (3 items), insufficient job control (2 items), low social support (2 items), job insecurity (2 items), organizational injustice (4 items), lack of reward (2 items), and work-life imbalance (2 items). The reliability and validity of the KOSS®19 were found to be satisfactory.

CONCLUSIONS

The KOSS®19 is a suitable tool for assessing occupational stress, effectively replacing the original KOSS and KOSS-SF.

摘要

背景

韩国职业压力量表(KOSS)于2004年编制。在此期间,产业结构不断演变,社会对职业压力的认知也发生了变化。本研究旨在开发并验证一个针对工人的韩国职业压力量表修订版(KOSS®19),以反映这些变化。

方法

KOSS®19是在26项KOSS简表(SF)的基础上,经八位专家评审编制而成。对359名服务业工人进行了一项调查,调查内容包括KOSS®19、倦怠量表和抑郁量表。对KOSS®19的各分量表进行了重新构建,并对其信度和效度进行了评估。

结果

KOSS®19由八个分量表组成:危险物理环境(2项)、高工作要求(3项)、工作控制不足(2项)、社会支持低(2项)、工作不安全感(2项)、组织不公正(4项)、缺乏奖励(2项)和工作生活失衡(2项)。结果发现KOSS®19的信度和效度令人满意。

结论

KOSS®19是评估职业压力的合适工具,能有效替代原来的KOSS和KOSS-SF。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验