Suppr超能文献

适度的植物-土壤反馈对生物多样性与生产力关系的影响较小:一项田间试验。

Moderate plant-soil feedbacks have small effects on the biodiversity-productivity relationship: A field experiment.

作者信息

Grenzer Josephine, Kulmatiski Andrew, Forero Leslie, Ebeling Anne, Eisenhauer Nico, Norton Jeanette

机构信息

Department of Wildland Resources and the Ecology Center Utah State University Logan UT USA.

Institute of Ecology and Evolution University of Jena Jena Germany.

出版信息

Ecol Evol. 2021 Aug 10;11(17):11651-11663. doi: 10.1002/ece3.7819. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Abstract

Plant-soil feedback (PSF) has gained attention as a mechanism promoting plant growth and coexistence. However, most PSF research has measured monoculture growth in greenhouse conditions. Translating PSFs into effects on plant growth in field communities remains an important frontier for PSF research. Using a 4-year, factorial field experiment in Jena, Germany, we measured the growth of nine grassland species on soils conditioned by each of the target species (i.e., 72 PSFs). Plant community models were parameterized with or without these PSF effects, and model predictions were compared to plant biomass production in diversity-productivity experiments. Plants created soils that changed subsequent plant biomass by 40%. However, because they were both positive and negative, the average PSF effect was 14% less growth on "home" than on "away" soils. Nine-species plant communities produced 29 to 37% more biomass for polycultures than for monocultures due primarily to selection effects. With or without PSF, plant community models predicted 28%-29% more biomass for polycultures than for monocultures, again due primarily to selection effects. : Despite causing 40% changes in plant biomass, PSFs had little effect on model predictions of plant community biomass across a range of species richness. While somewhat surprising, a lack of a PSF effect was appropriate in this site because species richness effects in this study were caused by selection effects and not complementarity effects (PSFs are a complementarity mechanism). Our plant community models helped us describe several reasons that even large PSF may not affect plant productivity. Notably, we found that dominant species demonstrated small PSF, suggesting there may be selective pressure for plants to create neutral PSF. Broadly, testing PSFs in plant communities in field conditions provided a more realistic understanding of how PSFs affect plant growth in communities in the context of other species traits.

摘要

植物-土壤反馈(PSF)作为一种促进植物生长和共存的机制已受到关注。然而,大多数PSF研究都是在温室条件下测量单一栽培的生长情况。将PSF转化为对田间群落中植物生长的影响仍然是PSF研究的一个重要前沿领域。我们在德国耶拿进行了一项为期4年的析因田间试验,测量了9种草甸物种在由每种目标物种处理过的土壤上的生长情况(即72种PSF)。植物群落模型在有或没有这些PSF效应的情况下进行参数化,并将模型预测结果与多样性-生产力实验中的植物生物量生产进行比较。植物创造的土壤使后续植物生物量变化了40%。然而,由于这些变化既有正向的也有负向的,PSF的平均效应是在“本地”土壤上的生长比在“异地”土壤上少14%。九物种植物群落的混播比单播产生的生物量多29%至37%,这主要是由于选择效应。无论有无PSF,植物群落模型预测混播比单播产生的生物量多28% - 29%,同样主要是由于选择效应。尽管PSF导致植物生物量变化了40%,但在一系列物种丰富度水平上,PSF对植物群落生物量的模型预测影响很小。虽然有点令人惊讶,但在这个地点缺乏PSF效应是合理的,因为本研究中的物种丰富度效应是由选择效应而非互补效应引起的(PSF是一种互补机制)。我们的植物群落模型帮助我们描述了即使是大的PSF也可能不影响植物生产力的几个原因。值得注意的是,我们发现优势物种表现出较小的PSF,这表明植物可能存在创造中性PSF的选择压力。总体而言,在田间条件下的植物群落中测试PSF能更现实地理解在其他物种特征的背景下PSF如何影响群落中的植物生长。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9210/8427583/f01b334189b4/ECE3-11-11651-g004.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验