• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过社区能力建设培养有韧性的社区。

Developing trauma resilient communities through community capacity-building.

机构信息

Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health, Los Angeles, CA, USA.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):1681. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11723-7.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-021-11723-7
PMID:34525982
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8443397/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Trauma is a significant public health issue, negatively impacting a range of health outcomes. Providers and administrators in public mental health systems recognize the widespread experience of trauma, as well as their limited ability to address trauma within their communities. In response, the Los Angeles County Department of Mental Health funded nine regionally based community partnerships to build capacity to address trauma. We describe partnership and community capacity-building efforts and examine community impact, defined as successful linkages to resources and changes in stress tolerance capacities among community members.

METHODS

We conceptualized community capacity-building as dissemination of trauma-informed education and training, community outreach and engagement, and linkage of community members to resources. We measured trauma-informed trainings among partnership members (N = 332) using the Trauma-Informed Organizational Toolkit. Outreach, engagement and linkages were documented using Event and Linkage Trackers. We examined changes in the type of successful linkage after the issuance of statewide mandatory restrictions in response to COVID-19. We examined changes in stress tolerance capacities among community members (N = 699) who were engaged in ongoing partnership activities using the 10-item Conner-Davidson Resilience Scale; the 28-item Coping Orientation to Problems; and the pictorial Inclusion of Community in Self Scale.

RESULTS

Training and education opportunities were widespread: 66% of members reported opportunities for training in 13 or more trauma-informed practices. Partnerships conducted over 7800 community capacity-building events with over 250,000 attendees. Nearly 14,000 successful linkages were made for a wide range of resources, with consistent linkage success prior to (85%) and during (87%) the pandemic. In response to COVID-19, linkage type significantly shifted from basic services and health care to food distribution (p < .01). Small but significant improvements occurred in coping through emotional and instrumental support; and sense of community connectedness (p < .05 each).

CONCLUSIONS

Community-based partnerships demonstrated effective capacity-building strategies. Despite the pandemic, community members did not report reduced stress tolerance, instead demonstrating gains in external help-seeking (use of emotional and instrumental supports) and perception of community connectedness. Future work will use qualitative methods to examine the impact of community capacity-building and the sustainability of this approach for addressing the impact of trauma within communities.

摘要

背景

创伤是一个重大的公共卫生问题,对一系列健康结果产生负面影响。公共心理健康系统的提供者和管理人员认识到创伤的广泛存在,以及他们在社区内解决创伤的能力有限。有鉴于此,洛杉矶县心理健康部为九个基于区域的社区合作关系提供资金,以建立解决创伤问题的能力。我们描述了合作伙伴关系和社区能力建设工作,并研究了社区影响,定义为成功建立资源联系以及社区成员的压力容忍能力的变化。

方法

我们将社区能力建设概念化为传播创伤知情教育和培训、社区外展和参与,以及将社区成员与资源联系起来。我们使用创伤知情组织工具包(Trauma-Informed Organizational Toolkit)衡量合作伙伴成员(N=332)的创伤知情培训。使用事件和联系跟踪器记录外展、参与和联系。我们检查了在全州范围内强制实施限制措施以应对 COVID-19 之后,成功联系类型的变化。我们使用 10 项康纳-戴维森韧性量表、28 项问题应对取向量表和自我包容社区的图片量表,检查了正在参与持续伙伴关系活动的社区成员(N=699)的压力容忍能力的变化。

结果

培训和教育机会广泛:66%的成员报告说有机会接受 13 项或更多创伤知情实践的培训。合作伙伴关系举办了超过 7800 次社区能力建设活动,有超过 25 万名参与者。近 14000 次成功的联系是为各种资源建立的,在大流行之前(85%)和期间(87%)都有持续的联系成功。针对 COVID-19,联系类型从基本服务和医疗保健显著转变为食品分发(p<.01)。在通过情感和工具支持以及社区归属感来应对方面,出现了较小但显著的改善(p<.05 各)。

结论

基于社区的合作伙伴关系展示了有效的能力建设策略。尽管受到大流行的影响,社区成员并没有报告压力容忍度降低,而是在寻求外部帮助(使用情感和工具支持)和社区归属感方面表现出了提高。未来的工作将使用定性方法来研究社区能力建设的影响以及这种方法在解决社区内创伤影响方面的可持续性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d1/8444358/9060ec3b3a27/12889_2021_11723_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d1/8444358/9060ec3b3a27/12889_2021_11723_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f6d1/8444358/9060ec3b3a27/12889_2021_11723_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Developing trauma resilient communities through community capacity-building.通过社区能力建设培养有韧性的社区。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Sep 16;21(1):1681. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-11723-7.
2
HUD's Livable Communities Conference: building capacity for change through evidence dissemination and partnership-based training.美国住房和城市发展部宜居社区会议:通过证据传播和基于伙伴关系的培训建设变革能力。
Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2013 Spring;7(1):5-24. doi: 10.1353/cpr.2013.0006.
3
Building trust: Leadership reflections on community empowerment and engagement in a large urban initiative.建立信任:领导力对大型城市倡议中社区赋权和参与的反思。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):1252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15860-z.
4
Community engagement in the prevention and control of COVID-19: Insights from Vietnam.社区参与 COVID-19 的预防和控制:来自越南的见解。
PLoS One. 2021 Sep 8;16(9):e0254432. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254432. eCollection 2021.
5
Building Capacity for Community-Academia Research Partnerships by Establishing a Physical Infrastructure for Community Engagement: Morgan CARES.通过建立社区参与的实体基础设施来建立社区-学术界研究伙伴关系的能力:Morgan CARES。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 30;19(19):12467. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912467.
6
Prioritizing Possibilities for Child and Family Health: An Agenda to Address Adverse Childhood Experiences and Foster the Social and Emotional Roots of Well-being in Pediatrics.优先考虑儿童和家庭健康的可能性:解决不良儿童经历问题并促进儿科学中幸福感的社会和情感根源的议程。
Acad Pediatr. 2017 Sep-Oct;17(7S):S36-S50. doi: 10.1016/j.acap.2017.06.002.
7
Clinical Practice Guidelines to Support Capacity Building in Orthopaedic Surgical Outreach: An International Consensus Building Approach.临床实践指南支持骨科外展能力建设:国际共识建立方法。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2024 Oct 16;106(20):1924-1933. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.23.01414. Epub 2024 May 16.
8
Building capacity for local public health: lessons from a mixed-methods evaluation of an academic-public health partnership used in response to COVID-19.建设地方公共卫生能力:在应对 COVID-19 期间,对学术-公共卫生伙伴关系进行混合方法评估的经验教训。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jul 31;12:1387371. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1387371. eCollection 2024.
9
Capacity Building for Refugee Mental Health in Resettlement: Implementation and Evaluation of Cross-Cultural Trauma-Informed Care Training.难民精神健康能力建设:跨文化创伤知情关怀培训的实施与评估。
J Immigr Minor Health. 2020 Oct;22(5):923-934. doi: 10.1007/s10903-020-00992-w.
10
Investigating health and social outcomes of the Big Local community empowerment initiative in England: a mixed method evaluation.调查英格兰“大地方”社区赋权计划对健康和社会结果的影响:一项混合方法评估。
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Oct;11(9):1-147. doi: 10.3310/GRMA6711.

引用本文的文献

1
An emerging knowledge exchange framework: Leadership insight into a key capacity-building impact in a large urban, trauma-informed initiative supporting resiliency and promoting equity.一个新兴的知识交流框架:领导力洞察对一项大型城市创伤知情倡议中关键能力建设影响的作用,该倡议支持恢复力并促进公平。
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 13;25(1):1746. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22268-4.
2
Community Impact of Capacity-Building to Develop Trauma Resilient Communities.建设具有创伤恢复能力社区的能力建设对社区的影响
Adm Policy Ment Health. 2025 Feb 17. doi: 10.1007/s10488-024-01429-4.
3
Post-traumatic stress disorder: evolving conceptualization and evidence, and future research directions.

本文引用的文献

1
Association Between Receipt of Unemployment Insurance and Food Insecurity Among People Who Lost Employment During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the United States.美国在新冠疫情期间失业人群领取失业救济金与食物不安全之间的关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Jan 4;4(1):e2035884. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.35884.
2
A Pandemic within a Pandemic - Intimate Partner Violence during Covid-19.大流行中的大流行——新冠疫情期间的亲密伴侣暴力行为
N Engl J Med. 2020 Dec 10;383(24):2302-2304. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2024046. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
3
Covid-19 and Domestic Violence: an Indirect Path to Social and Economic Crisis.
创伤后应激障碍:不断演变的概念化、证据及未来研究方向
World Psychiatry. 2025 Feb;24(1):52-80. doi: 10.1002/wps.21269.
4
Strengthening community capacity to address trauma through a Community Ambassador Network.通过社区大使网络增强社区应对创伤的能力。
Fam Syst Health. 2024 Dec;42(4):582-593. doi: 10.1037/fsh0000900. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
5
Insights From Community Organizations Collaborating With Government and Academia to Foster Health Literacy.社区组织与政府和学术界合作以促进健康素养的见解。
Health Educ Behav. 2025 Apr;52(2):179-189. doi: 10.1177/10901981241285584. Epub 2024 Oct 15.
6
The development of trauma-informed community partnerships: A mixed method social network study.创伤知情社区伙伴关系的发展:一项混合方法社会网络研究。
Hum Serv Organ Manag Leadersh Gov. 2024;48(1):1-18. doi: 10.1080/23303131.2023.2260432. Epub 2023 Oct 12.
7
Updating the Chronic Illness and Disability Payment System.更新慢性病和残疾抚恤金制度。
Med Care. 2024 Mar 1;62(3):175-181. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000001968. Epub 2024 Jan 5.
8
Engagement With Mental Health Services Among Survivors of Firearm Injury.枪支伤害幸存者与心理健康服务的互动关系。
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Oct 2;6(10):e2340246. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.40246.
9
Building trust: Leadership reflections on community empowerment and engagement in a large urban initiative.建立信任:领导力对大型城市倡议中社区赋权和参与的反思。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Jun 28;23(1):1252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-15860-z.
新冠疫情与家庭暴力:通往社会和经济危机的间接路径
J Fam Violence. 2022;37(5):759-765. doi: 10.1007/s10896-020-00188-8. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
4
Exacerbation of Physical Intimate Partner Violence during COVID-19 Pandemic.新冠疫情期间身体亲密伴侣暴力的加剧。
Radiology. 2021 Jan;298(1):E38-E45. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020202866. Epub 2020 Aug 13.
5
Structural Racism, Social Risk Factors, and Covid-19 - A Dangerous Convergence for Black Americans.结构性种族主义、社会风险因素与新冠疫情——美国黑人面临的危险交集
N Engl J Med. 2020 Sep 17;383(12):e77. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp2023616. Epub 2020 Jul 22.
6
Disparities In Outcomes Among COVID-19 Patients In A Large Health Care System In California.加利福尼亚州大型医疗保健系统中 COVID-19 患者的结局差异。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2020 Jul;39(7):1253-1262. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00598. Epub 2020 May 21.
7
A Community's Response to Adverse Childhood Experiences: Building a Resilient, Trauma-Informed Community.社区对儿童期逆境的反应:建设有韧性、具备创伤知情能力的社区。
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Dec;64(3-4):451-466. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12386. Epub 2019 Sep 4.
8
Population Health and Trauma-Informed Practice: Implications for Programs, Systems, and Policies.人群健康与创伤知情实践:对项目、系统和政策的影响。
Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Dec;64(3-4):494-508. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12382. Epub 2019 Aug 24.
9
Implementing a Trauma-Informed Public Health System in San Francisco, California.在加利福尼亚州旧金山实施创伤知情的公共卫生系统。
Health Educ Behav. 2019 Apr;46(2):251-259. doi: 10.1177/1090198118806942. Epub 2018 Oct 18.
10
The effect of multiple adverse childhood experiences on health: a systematic review and meta-analysis.多种不良童年经历对健康的影响:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet Public Health. 2017 Aug;2(8):e356-e366. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30118-4. Epub 2017 Jul 31.