• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

新闻和社交媒体中公众人物的死后记忆。

Postmortem memory of public figures in news and social media.

机构信息

School of Computer and Communication Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland;

Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 21;118(38). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106152118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2106152118
PMID:34526401
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8463883/
Abstract

Deceased public figures are often said to live on in collective memory. We quantify this phenomenon by tracking mentions of 2,362 public figures in English-language online news and social media (Twitter) 1 y before and after death. We measure the sharp spike and rapid decay of attention following death and model collective memory as a composition of communicative and cultural memory. Clustering reveals four patterns of postmortem memory, and regression analysis shows that boosts in media attention are largest for premortem popular anglophones who died a young, unnatural death; that long-term boosts are smallest for leaders and largest for artists; and that, while both the news and Twitter are triggered by young and unnatural deaths, the news additionally curates collective memory when old persons or leaders die. Overall, we illuminate the age-old question of who is remembered by society, and the distinct roles of news and social media in collective memory formation.

摘要

人们常说,已故公众人物会活在集体记忆中。我们通过追踪 2362 位已故公众人物在英语新闻和社交媒体(推特)上的信息,量化了这一现象。我们记录了在死亡前后 1 年中,人们对这些公众人物的关注度的急剧上升和迅速衰减,并将集体记忆建模为交际记忆和文化记忆的组合。聚类分析揭示了四种死后记忆模式,回归分析表明,对于生前广受欢迎的、非正常死亡的年轻英语母语者,媒体关注度的提升最大;而对于领导人,长期的关注度提升最小;而且,虽然新闻和推特都会因年轻人和非自然死亡而被触发,但新闻在老年人或领导人去世时还会对集体记忆进行编辑。总的来说,我们阐明了社会会记住谁这个古老的问题,以及新闻和社交媒体在集体记忆形成中的不同作用。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1c2/8463883/cb5051402f51/pnas.2106152118fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1c2/8463883/6b1cf3293915/pnas.2106152118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1c2/8463883/7efb63c869ce/pnas.2106152118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1c2/8463883/f2c9f1273aa3/pnas.2106152118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1c2/8463883/cb5051402f51/pnas.2106152118fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1c2/8463883/6b1cf3293915/pnas.2106152118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1c2/8463883/7efb63c869ce/pnas.2106152118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1c2/8463883/f2c9f1273aa3/pnas.2106152118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a1c2/8463883/cb5051402f51/pnas.2106152118fig04.jpg

相似文献

1
Postmortem memory of public figures in news and social media.新闻和社交媒体中公众人物的死后记忆。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 21;118(38). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106152118.
2
Temporal and textual analysis of social media on collective discourses during the Zika virus pandemic.社交媒体在寨卡病毒疫情期间集体话语的时间和文本分析。
BMC Public Health. 2020 May 29;20(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08923-y.
3
Conversations and Medical News Frames on Twitter: Infodemiological Study on COVID-19 in South Korea.推特上的对话与医学新闻框架:韩国新冠肺炎信息流行病学研究
J Med Internet Res. 2020 May 5;22(5):e18897. doi: 10.2196/18897.
4
Associations between news coverage, social media discussions, and search trends about celebrity deaths, screening, and other colorectal cancer-related events.名人死亡、筛查及其他结直肠癌相关事件的新闻报道、社交媒体讨论与搜索趋势之间的关联。
Prev Med. 2024 Aug;185:108022. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2024.108022. Epub 2024 May 31.
5
Tweeting celebrity suicides: Users' reaction to prominent suicide deaths on Twitter and subsequent increases in actual suicides.在 Twitter 上发布名人自杀事件:用户对知名自杀事件的反应,以及随后自杀事件实际增加的情况。
Soc Sci Med. 2017 Sep;189:158-166. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.06.032. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
6
Celebrities and Breast Cancer: A Multidimensional Quali-Quantitative Analysis of News Stories Shared on Social Media.名人与乳腺癌:社交媒体新闻报道的多维定性定量分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Aug 5;19(15):9676. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159676.
7
Communicating Ebola through social media and electronic news media outlets: A cross-sectional study.通过社交媒体和电子新闻媒体传播埃博拉病毒:一项横断面研究。
Health Informatics J. 2016 Sep;22(3):470-8. doi: 10.1177/1460458214568037. Epub 2015 Feb 5.
8
Mapping social media attention in Microbiology: identifying main topics and actors.绘制微生物学领域社交媒体关注度图谱:识别主要话题和参与者。
FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2019 Apr 1;366(7). doi: 10.1093/femsle/fnz075.
9
Increasing Interest of Mass Communication Media and the General Public in the Distribution of Tweets About Mental Disorders: Observational Study.大众传播媒体和公众对有关精神障碍推文传播的兴趣日益增加:观察性研究。
J Med Internet Res. 2018 May 28;20(5):e205. doi: 10.2196/jmir.9582.
10
Comparing News Articles and Tweets About COVID-19 in Brazil: Sentiment Analysis and Topic Modeling Approach.比较巴西关于 COVID-19 的新闻文章和推文:情感分析和主题建模方法。
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2021 Feb 10;7(2):e24585. doi: 10.2196/24585.

引用本文的文献

1
Persistence of collective memory of corporate bankruptcy events discussed on X (Twitter) is influenced by pre-bankruptcy public attention.公司破产事件在 X(推特)上的集体记忆的持久性受到破产前公众关注度的影响。
Sci Rep. 2024 Mar 19;14(1):6552. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-53758-x.
2
Poor attention: The wealth and regional gaps in event attention and coverage on Wikipedia.关注不足:维基百科上事件关注度和报道的贫富与地区差距。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 8;18(11):e0289325. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289325. eCollection 2023.
3
The fragility of artists' reputations from 1795 to 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Competing national memories of World War II. 二战时期相互竞争的国家记忆。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 20;116(34):16678-16686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907992116. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
The universal decay of collective memory and attention.普遍的集体记忆和注意力衰退。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Jan;3(1):82-91. doi: 10.1038/s41562-018-0474-5. Epub 2018 Dec 10.
3
How the medium shapes the message: Printing and the rise of the arts and sciences.媒介如何塑造信息:印刷术与艺术和科学的兴起。
1795 年至 2020 年艺术家声誉的脆弱性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 29;120(35):e2302269120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2302269120. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
4
United States politicians' tone became more negative with 2016 primary campaigns.2016 年总统初选开始后,美国政客的态度变得更加消极。
Sci Rep. 2023 Jun 28;13(1):10495. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-36839-1.
5
A two-phase model of collective memory decay with a dynamical switching point.具有动态切换点的集体记忆衰减两阶段模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 12;12(1):21484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25840-9.
PLoS One. 2019 Feb 20;14(2):e0205771. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205771. eCollection 2019.
4
Fake news on Twitter during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.2016年美国总统大选期间推特上的假新闻。
Science. 2019 Jan 25;363(6425):374-378. doi: 10.1126/science.aau2706.
5
Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election.推特上 2016 年美国总统大选期间假新闻的影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 2;10(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2.
6
Quantifying reputation and success in art.量化艺术中的声誉和成功。
Science. 2018 Nov 16;362(6416):825-829. doi: 10.1126/science.aau7224. Epub 2018 Nov 8.
7
Hot streaks in artistic, cultural, and scientific careers.艺术、文化和科学领域的火热表现期。
Nature. 2018 Jul;559(7714):396-399. doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0315-8. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
8
The memory remains: Understanding collective memory in the digital age.记忆长存:数字时代的集体记忆研究
Sci Adv. 2017 Apr 5;3(4):e1602368. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1602368. eCollection 2017 Apr.
9
Quantifying the evolution of individual scientific impact.量化个体科学影响力的演变。
Science. 2016 Nov 4;354(6312). doi: 10.1126/science.aaf5239.
10
Pantheon 1.0, a manually verified dataset of globally famous biographies.万神殿 1.0,一个手动验证的全球知名人物传记数据集。
Sci Data. 2016 Jan 5;3:150075. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2015.75.