• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Competing national memories of World War II. 二战时期相互竞争的国家记忆。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 20;116(34):16678-16686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907992116. Epub 2019 Aug 12.
2
Who won World War II? Conflicting narratives among the allies.谁赢得了第二次世界大战?盟国之间存在相互矛盾的说法。
Prog Brain Res. 2022;274(1):129-147. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2022.06.003. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
3
Collective memories of three wars in United States history in younger and older adults.美国历史上三场战争在年轻人和老年人中的集体记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):383-99. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0369-7.
4
Overclaiming responsibility in fictitious countries: Unpacking the role of availability in support theory predictions of overclaiming.在虚构国家过度主张责任:剖析可得性在支持过度主张的支持理论预测中的作用。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Nov;48(8):1346-1358. doi: 10.3758/s13421-020-01059-9.
5
Nurses across borders: displaced Russian and Soviet nurses after World War I and World War II.跨国界的护士:一战和二战后流离失所的俄罗斯及苏联护士
Nurs Hist Rev. 2014;22:13-36. doi: 10.1891/1062-8061.22.13.
6
Collective memories of Germans and Japanese about the past half-century.德国人和日本人对过去半个世纪的集体记忆。
Memory. 1998 Jul;6(4):427-54. doi: 10.1080/741942611.
7
Living in history and living by the cultural life script: How older Germans date their autobiographical memories.生活在历史中并遵循文化生活脚本:德国老年人如何确定他们自传式记忆的年代。
Memory. 2016;24(4):482-95. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2015.1019890. Epub 2015 Mar 13.
8
Collective overclaiming is related to collective narcissism and numeracy.集体夸大与集体自恋和数字能力有关。
Mem Cognit. 2024 May;52(4):840-851. doi: 10.3758/s13421-023-01504-5. Epub 2024 Jan 2.
9
The mortality of Allied prisoners of war and Belgian civilian deportees in German custody during the First World War: a reappraisal of the effects of forced labour.第一次世界大战期间被德国关押的协约国战俘和比利时被驱逐平民的死亡率:对强迫劳动影响的重新评估
Popul Stud (Camb). 2006 Jul;60(2):121-36. doi: 10.1080/00324720600597969.
10
[Mortality of psychiatric inpatients in France during World War II: a demographic study].[第二次世界大战期间法国精神科住院患者的死亡率:一项人口统计学研究]
Encephale. 2009 Apr;35(2):121-8. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2008.02.007. Epub 2008 Jun 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Primus inter pares effect in high schools.在高中里的“平等中的首席”效应。
Front Psychol. 2024 Oct 11;15:1382062. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1382062. eCollection 2024.
2
The fragility of artists' reputations from 1795 to 2020.1795 年至 2020 年艺术家声誉的脆弱性。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2023 Aug 29;120(35):e2302269120. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2302269120. Epub 2023 Aug 21.
3
A two-phase model of collective memory decay with a dynamical switching point.具有动态切换点的集体记忆衰减两阶段模型。
Sci Rep. 2022 Dec 12;12(1):21484. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-25840-9.
4
Postmortem memory of public figures in news and social media.新闻和社交媒体中公众人物的死后记忆。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Sep 21;118(38). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2106152118.
5
QnAs with Henry L. Roediger III.与亨利·L·罗伊迪格三世的问答
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020 Apr 7;117(14):7546-7547. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2002170117. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
6
Maradona in our minds: The FIFA World Cup as a way to address collective memory properties.我们心中的马拉多纳:作为一种唤起集体记忆方式的国际足联世界杯。
Mem Cognit. 2020 Apr;48(3):469-480. doi: 10.3758/s13421-019-00983-9.

本文引用的文献

1
Moralized memory: binding values predict inflated estimates of the group's historical influence.道德化记忆:绑定价值观预测群体历史影响力的夸大估计。
Memory. 2019 Sep;27(8):1099-1109. doi: 10.1080/09658211.2019.1623261. Epub 2019 May 30.
2
Collective Narcissism: Americans Exaggerate the Role of Their Home State in Appraising U.S. History.集体自恋:美国人夸大了其家乡在评价美国历史中的作用。
Psychol Sci. 2018 Sep;29(9):1414-1422. doi: 10.1177/0956797618772504. Epub 2018 Jun 18.
3
Collective Memory from a Psychological Perspective.从心理学角度看集体记忆
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 May;22(5):438-451. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.02.010.
4
Bias and ignorance in demographic perception.人口观念的偏见与无知。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Oct;25(5):1606-1618. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1360-2.
5
Collective memories of three wars in United States history in younger and older adults.美国历史上三场战争在年轻人和老年人中的集体记忆。
Mem Cognit. 2014 Apr;42(3):383-99. doi: 10.3758/s13421-013-0369-7.
6
Collective narcissism and its social consequences.集体自恋及其社会后果。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Dec;97(6):1074-96. doi: 10.1037/a0016904.
7
Collective memory: conceptual foundations and theoretical approaches.集体记忆:概念基础与理论方法。
Memory. 2008 Apr;16(3):318-26. doi: 10.1080/09658210701801434.
8
How the past weighs on the present: social representations of history and their role in identity politics.过去如何重压当下:历史的社会表征及其在身份政治中的作用。
Br J Soc Psychol. 2005 Dec;44(Pt 4):537-56. doi: 10.1348/014466605X27162.

二战时期相互竞争的国家记忆。

Competing national memories of World War II.

机构信息

Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130-4899;

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Regensburg, 93040 Regensburg, Germany.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Aug 20;116(34):16678-16686. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1907992116. Epub 2019 Aug 12.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.1907992116
PMID:31405968
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6708356/
Abstract

We assessed the knowledge of 1,338 people from 11 countries (8 former Allied and 3 former Axis) about World War II. When asked what percentage their country contributed to the war effort, across Allied countries, estimates totaled 309%, and Axis nations' estimates came to 140%. People in 4 nations claimed more than 50% responsibility for their country (Germany, Russia, United Kingdom, and United States). The overclaiming of responsibility reflected in these percentages was moderated when subjects were asked to consider the contributions of other countries; however, Russians continued to claim great responsibility, the only country that remained well over 50% in its claim of responsibility for the Allied victory. If deaths in the war are considered a proxy of a nation's contributions, the Soviet Union did carry much of the burden. This study points to sharp differences in national memory even across nations who fought on the same side in the war. Differing national perspectives shape diverse memories of the same complex event.

摘要

我们评估了来自 11 个国家(8 个前盟国和 3 个前轴心国)的 1338 人的知识,这些人了解二战。当被问及他们的国家对战争的贡献百分比时,盟国的估计总计为 309%,轴心国的估计为 140%。4 个国家的人声称自己的国家负有超过 50%的责任(德国、俄罗斯、英国和美国)。当被要求考虑其他国家的贡献时,这些百分比所反映的过度责任得到了缓和;然而,俄罗斯人继续声称自己负有巨大的责任,这是唯一一个在声称对盟国胜利负有责任方面仍超过 50%的国家。如果将战争中的死亡人数视为一个国家贡献的代理,那么苏联确实承担了大部分负担。这项研究表明,即使是在战争中站在同一阵营的国家,它们之间也存在着明显的民族记忆差异。不同的国家观点塑造了对同一复杂事件的不同记忆。