Levich Institute and Physics Department, City College of New York, New York, NY, 10031, USA.
ICTEAM, Université Catholique de Louvain, Avenue George Lemaître 4, 1348, Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 2;10(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2.
The dynamics and influence of fake news on Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election remains to be clarified. Here, we use a dataset of 171 million tweets in the five months preceding the election day to identify 30 million tweets, from 2.2 million users, which contain a link to news outlets. Based on a classification of news outlets curated by www.opensources.co , we find that 25% of these tweets spread either fake or extremely biased news. We characterize the networks of information flow to find the most influential spreaders of fake and traditional news and use causal modeling to uncover how fake news influenced the presidential election. We find that, while top influencers spreading traditional center and left leaning news largely influence the activity of Clinton supporters, this causality is reversed for the fake news: the activity of Trump supporters influences the dynamics of the top fake news spreaders.
2016 年美国总统大选期间,推特上虚假新闻的动态及其影响仍有待澄清。在这里,我们使用选举日前五个月的 1.71 亿条推文数据集,从中识别出 3000 万条推文,这些推文来自 220 万用户,其中包含指向新闻媒体的链接。基于由 www.opensources.co 整理的新闻媒体分类,我们发现其中 25%的推文传播的是虚假或极具偏见的新闻。我们对信息流网络进行了特征化处理,以找到传播虚假和传统新闻的最具影响力的传播者,并使用因果建模来揭示虚假新闻如何影响总统选举。我们发现,尽管传播传统中左倾新闻的顶级影响者在很大程度上影响了克林顿支持者的活动,但这种因果关系在虚假新闻中是相反的:特朗普支持者的活动影响了顶级虚假新闻传播者的动态。