Suppr超能文献

仅使用卷烟的吸烟者中,ENDS、NRT 和药物戒烟的效果:PATH 研究第 3 波(2015-2016 年)和第 4 波(2016-2017 年)的纵向分析,成人数据。

Effectiveness of ENDS, NRT and medication for smoking cessation among cigarette-only users: a longitudinal analysis of PATH Study wave 3 (2015-2016) and 4 (2016-2017), adult data.

机构信息

Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA

Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Tobacco Treatment Clinic, Johns Hopkins Medicine School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Tob Control. 2023 May;32(3):302-307. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056448. Epub 2021 Sep 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research is inconclusive on the effectiveness of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) as cigarette cessation aids compared with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or non-NRT medication. This study compared the cigarette cessation rates for ENDS, NRT and non-NRT medication.

METHOD

Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study wave 3 cigarette-only users who used ENDS, NRT or non-NRT medication (varenicline and bupropion) to quit smoking between wave 3 and 4 were included. 'Cessation' was defined as being a former cigarette smoker in wave 4. χ, logistic regression, and a sensitivity analysis with Bayes factor assessed the association between quitting smoking and method used.

RESULTS

Among 6794 cigarette-only users, 532 used ENDS (n=75), NRT (n=289), non-NRT medication (n=68), or a combination of NRT and non-NRT medication (n=100) to quit smoking between wave 3 and 4. The percentages of quitting smoking among those who used ENDS, NRT, non-NRT medication, and a combination of NRT and non-NRT medication were 16.2% (n=14), 16.1% (n=47), 17.7% (n=13), and 14.8% (n=12), respectively (p=0.97). None of the cigarette-only users who used ENDS to quit smoking became ENDS-only users in wave 4; 37.6% became dual users of ENDS and cigarettes.

CONCLUSION

No differences were found when cessation rates of ENDS, NRT or non-NRT medication were compared. Given uncertainty about the long-term health effect of ENDS and the likelihood of becoming dual users, people who smoke and need assistance quitting should be encouraged to use current Food and Drug Administration-approved cessation methods until more effective methods are developed.

摘要

背景

与尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)或非-NRT 药物相比,关于电子烟作为戒烟辅助手段的效果,研究结果尚无定论。本研究比较了电子烟、NRT 和非-NRT 药物(伐尼克兰和安非他酮)的戒烟率。

方法

纳入人群评估烟草与健康研究第 3 波仅使用电子烟、NRT 或非-NRT 药物(伐尼克兰和安非他酮)戒烟的吸烟者。第 4 波中被定义为前吸烟者。采用卡方检验、逻辑回归和贝叶斯因子敏感性分析评估与戒烟方法相关的关联。

结果

在 6794 名仅吸烟的使用者中,532 名在第 3 波至第 4 波期间使用电子烟(n=75)、NRT(n=289)、非-NRT 药物(n=68)或 NRT 和非-NRT 药物的组合(n=100)来戒烟。使用电子烟、NRT、非-NRT 药物和 NRT 与非-NRT 药物组合戒烟的吸烟者百分比分别为 16.2%(n=14)、16.1%(n=47)、17.7%(n=13)和 14.8%(n=12)(p=0.97)。没有一名使用电子烟戒烟的吸烟者在第 4 波成为电子烟专用用户;37.6%的人成为电子烟和香烟的双重使用者。

结论

当比较电子烟、NRT 或非-NRT 药物的戒烟率时,没有发现差异。鉴于电子烟对长期健康影响的不确定性以及成为双重使用者的可能性,需要帮助戒烟的吸烟者应被鼓励使用目前美国食品和药物管理局批准的戒烟方法,直到开发出更有效的方法。

相似文献

2
Interventions to reduce harm from continued tobacco use.减少持续吸烟危害的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 13;10(10):CD005231. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005231.pub3.
4
Treatment of Tobacco Smoking: A Review.烟草使用治疗:综述。
JAMA. 2022 Feb 8;327(6):566-577. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.0395.
8
10
Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的尼古丁替代疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11:CD000146. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000146.pub4.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.电子烟戒烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 29;4(4):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub5.
3
Tobacco Product Use Among Adults - United States, 2019.成年人烟草制品使用情况 - 美国,2019 年。
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020 Nov 20;69(46):1736-1742. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6946a4.
4
Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation.用于戒烟的电子烟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 14;10(10):CD010216. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010216.pub4.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验