Department of Health, Behavior and Society, Institute for Global Tobacco Control, Johns Hopkins University Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Tobacco Treatment Clinic, Johns Hopkins Medicine School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
Tob Control. 2023 May;32(3):302-307. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2020-056448. Epub 2021 Sep 15.
Research is inconclusive on the effectiveness of electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) as cigarette cessation aids compared with nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) or non-NRT medication. This study compared the cigarette cessation rates for ENDS, NRT and non-NRT medication.
Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health Study wave 3 cigarette-only users who used ENDS, NRT or non-NRT medication (varenicline and bupropion) to quit smoking between wave 3 and 4 were included. 'Cessation' was defined as being a former cigarette smoker in wave 4. χ, logistic regression, and a sensitivity analysis with Bayes factor assessed the association between quitting smoking and method used.
Among 6794 cigarette-only users, 532 used ENDS (n=75), NRT (n=289), non-NRT medication (n=68), or a combination of NRT and non-NRT medication (n=100) to quit smoking between wave 3 and 4. The percentages of quitting smoking among those who used ENDS, NRT, non-NRT medication, and a combination of NRT and non-NRT medication were 16.2% (n=14), 16.1% (n=47), 17.7% (n=13), and 14.8% (n=12), respectively (p=0.97). None of the cigarette-only users who used ENDS to quit smoking became ENDS-only users in wave 4; 37.6% became dual users of ENDS and cigarettes.
No differences were found when cessation rates of ENDS, NRT or non-NRT medication were compared. Given uncertainty about the long-term health effect of ENDS and the likelihood of becoming dual users, people who smoke and need assistance quitting should be encouraged to use current Food and Drug Administration-approved cessation methods until more effective methods are developed.
与尼古丁替代疗法(NRT)或非-NRT 药物相比,关于电子烟作为戒烟辅助手段的效果,研究结果尚无定论。本研究比较了电子烟、NRT 和非-NRT 药物(伐尼克兰和安非他酮)的戒烟率。
纳入人群评估烟草与健康研究第 3 波仅使用电子烟、NRT 或非-NRT 药物(伐尼克兰和安非他酮)戒烟的吸烟者。第 4 波中被定义为前吸烟者。采用卡方检验、逻辑回归和贝叶斯因子敏感性分析评估与戒烟方法相关的关联。
在 6794 名仅吸烟的使用者中,532 名在第 3 波至第 4 波期间使用电子烟(n=75)、NRT(n=289)、非-NRT 药物(n=68)或 NRT 和非-NRT 药物的组合(n=100)来戒烟。使用电子烟、NRT、非-NRT 药物和 NRT 与非-NRT 药物组合戒烟的吸烟者百分比分别为 16.2%(n=14)、16.1%(n=47)、17.7%(n=13)和 14.8%(n=12)(p=0.97)。没有一名使用电子烟戒烟的吸烟者在第 4 波成为电子烟专用用户;37.6%的人成为电子烟和香烟的双重使用者。
当比较电子烟、NRT 或非-NRT 药物的戒烟率时,没有发现差异。鉴于电子烟对长期健康影响的不确定性以及成为双重使用者的可能性,需要帮助戒烟的吸烟者应被鼓励使用目前美国食品和药物管理局批准的戒烟方法,直到开发出更有效的方法。