Suppr超能文献

小儿肩肘化脓性关节炎的穿刺抽吸或关节切开术:一项系统评价

Aspiration or arthrotomy for paediatric septic arthritis of the shoulder and elbow: a systematic review.

作者信息

Spaans Anne J, Donders C M Lilian, Bessems J H J M Gert, van Bergen Christiaan J A

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Sint Maartenskliniek Nijmegen/Boxmeer, the Netherlands.

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Meander Medical Center Amersfoort, the Netherlands.

出版信息

EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Aug 10;6(8):651-657. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200122. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Upper extremity arthritis in children can be treated with joint aspiration, arthroscopy or arthrotomy, followed by antibiotics. The literature seems inconclusive with respect to the optimal drainage technique. Therefore, the objective of this systematic review was to identify the most effective drainage technique for septic arthritis of the upper extremity in children.Two independent investigators systematically searched the electronic MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases for original articles that reported outcomes of aspiration, arthroscopy or arthrotomy for septic arthritis of the paediatric shoulder or elbow. Outcome parameters were clinical improvement, need for repetitive surgery or drainage, and complications.Out of 2428 articles, seven studies with a total of 171 patients treated by aspiration or arthrotomy were included in the systematic review. Five studies reported on shoulder septic arthritis, one study on elbow septic arthritis, and one study on both joints. All studies were retrospective, except for one randomized prospective study. No difference was found between type of treatment and radiological or clinical outcomes. Aspiration of the shoulder or elbow joint required an additional procedure in 44% of patients, while arthrotomy required 12% additional procedures.Conclusion: Both aspiration and arthrotomy can achieve good clinical results in children with septic arthritis of the shoulder or elbow joint. However, the scientific quality of the included studies is low. It seems that the first procedure can be aspiration and washout and start of intravenous antibiotics, knowing that aspiration may have a higher risk of additional drainage procedures. Cite this article: 2021;6:651-657. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200122.

摘要

儿童上肢关节炎可通过关节穿刺、关节镜检查或关节切开术进行治疗,随后使用抗生素。关于最佳引流技术,文献似乎尚无定论。因此,本系统评价的目的是确定治疗儿童上肢化脓性关节炎最有效的引流技术。两名独立研究人员系统检索了电子MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,以查找报告小儿肩部或肘部化脓性关节炎穿刺、关节镜检查或关节切开术结果的原始文章。结果参数包括临床改善情况、重复手术或引流的必要性以及并发症。在2428篇文章中,有7项研究共171例接受穿刺或关节切开术治疗的患者被纳入系统评价。5项研究报告了肩部化脓性关节炎,1项研究报告了肘部化脓性关节炎,1项研究报告了两个关节的情况。除1项随机前瞻性研究外,所有研究均为回顾性研究。在治疗类型与放射学或临床结果之间未发现差异。肩部或肘关节穿刺在44%的患者中需要额外的手术,而关节切开术需要额外手术的比例为12%。结论:穿刺和关节切开术在治疗儿童肩部或肘关节化脓性关节炎方面均可取得良好的临床效果。然而,纳入研究的科学质量较低。似乎首先可以进行穿刺冲洗并开始静脉使用抗生素,同时要知道穿刺可能有更高的额外引流手术风险。引用本文:2021;6:651 - 657。DOI: 10.1302/2058 - 5241.6.200122。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d9e8/8419799/60529b3787f3/eor-6-651-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验