• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

处方适宜性评估指南。

Guideline for the evaluation of prescription appropriateness.

作者信息

Bian Jing, Li Quanzhi, Li Jing, Yang Nan, Zhang Wei, Mei Dan, Zhong Mingkang, Miao Liyan, Lu Xiaoyang, Jiang Ling, Du Guang, Gao Shen, Jiang Xuehua, Lu Jin, Yan Bing, Kong Fancui, Chen Yaolong, Zhen Jiancun

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Beijing Jishuitan Hospital, Beijing, China.

Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China.

出版信息

Ann Transl Med. 2021 Aug;9(16):1352. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7502.

DOI:10.21037/atm-20-7502
PMID:34532489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8422117/
Abstract

Evaluation of prescriptions is a necessary process of evaluating the appropriateness of clinical drug usage, discovering existing problems, and formulating solutions. There are challenges for professionals within hospital medical departments and for clinicians and pharmacists who have clinical questions relating to inappropriate or abnormal prescriptions as identified by the electronic evaluation system of prescription. Medications are usually used correctly according to the drug instructions or guidelines. At present, there are no relevant domestic or international guidelines, or principles or standards for identifying inappropriate or abnormal prescriptions. To develop the guideline for evaluation of prescriptions appropriateness in clinical practice, the Pharmaceutical Affairs Commission of the Chinese Hospital Association formed the guideline working group consisting of multidisciplinary experts. The guideline working group summarized clinical questions in the evaluation of prescriptions, searched for supporting evidence, and reached a consensus for recommendations. The guideline contains 6 recommendations for evaluating prescription appropriateness, and the general principle of these recommendations is that clinicians should provide drug instructions, guidelines, or moderate evidence supporting the prescription, and the evaluators will then judge the prescription to be either appropriate or irrational. The recommendations resolve common clinical questions, using supporting examples, explanations and a flow chart. The evaluation of prescription appropriateness could be made more systematic and transparent based on this guideline's conclusions.

摘要

处方评估是评估临床用药合理性、发现现存问题并制定解决方案的必要过程。对于医院内科专业人员以及对于那些有与电子处方评估系统识别出的不恰当或异常处方相关临床问题的临床医生和药剂师而言,存在着挑战。药物通常是按照药品说明书或指南正确使用的。目前,国内外尚无识别不恰当或异常处方的相关指南、原则或标准。为制定临床实践中处方适宜性评估指南,中国医院协会药事管理专业委员会组建了由多学科专家组成的指南工作组。该指南工作组总结了处方评估中的临床问题,查找了支持证据,并就建议达成了共识。该指南包含6条评估处方适宜性的建议,这些建议的总体原则是临床医生应提供药品说明书、指南或支持该处方的适度证据,然后评估人员将判断该处方是适宜还是不合理。这些建议通过示例、解释和流程图解决常见的临床问题。基于本指南的结论,处方适宜性评估可以变得更加系统和透明。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1da4/8422117/cdc82b0d9d04/atm-09-16-1352-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1da4/8422117/cdc82b0d9d04/atm-09-16-1352-f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1da4/8422117/cdc82b0d9d04/atm-09-16-1352-f1.jpg

相似文献

1
Guideline for the evaluation of prescription appropriateness.处方适宜性评估指南。
Ann Transl Med. 2021 Aug;9(16):1352. doi: 10.21037/atm-20-7502.
2
Improved appropriateness of anti-tuberculosis prescription by the expert prescription review program in Taiwan.通过台湾的专家处方审查计划提高抗结核处方的适宜性。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2020 Nov;119(11):1658-1665. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2019.12.011. Epub 2020 Jan 10.
3
E-prescribing errors identified in a compounding pharmacy: a quality-improvement project.在一家复方药房中识别出的电子处方错误:一项质量改进项目。
Int J Pharm Compd. 2014 Jan-Feb;18(1):83-6.
4
Appropriateness of psychotropic drug prescriptions in the elderly: structuring tools based on data extracted from the hospital information system to understand physician practices.老年人精神药物处方的适宜性:基于从医院信息系统提取的数据构建工具以了解医生的用药习惯。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Apr 30;19(1):272. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4064-7.
5
Procedures and methods of benefit assessments for medicines in Germany.德国药品效益评估的程序和方法。
Eur J Health Econ. 2008 Nov;9 Suppl 1:5-29. doi: 10.1007/s10198-008-0122-5.
6
Variation in antibiotic prescription rates in febrile children presenting to emergency departments across Europe (MOFICHE): A multicentre observational study.在欧洲各急诊科就诊的发热儿童中抗生素处方率的差异(MOFICHE):一项多中心观察性研究。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003208. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003208. eCollection 2020 Aug.
7
Definition of indicators of the appropriateness of oral anticoagulant prescriptions in hospitalized adults: Literature review and consensus (PACHA study).定义住院成人口服抗凝药物处方适宜性的指标:文献复习和共识(PACHA 研究)。
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Mar;111(3):155-171. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Sep 21.
8
Appropriateness of prescribing among elderly patients in a Dutch residential home: observational study of outcomes after a pharmacist-led medication review.荷兰一家养老院老年患者的处方适宜性:药师主导的药物审查后结局的观察性研究
Drugs Aging. 2008;25(11):947-54. doi: 10.2165/0002512-200825110-00005.
9
How to recognize a trustworthy clinical practice guideline.如何识别值得信赖的临床实践指南。
J Anesth Analg Crit Care. 2023 Apr 28;3(1):9. doi: 10.1186/s44158-023-00094-7.
10
[Needs assessment to improve the applicability and methodological quality of a German S3 guideline].[提高德国S3指南适用性和方法学质量的需求评估]
Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes. 2018 Apr;131-132:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.zefq.2017.09.002. Epub 2017 Sep 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Establishment, maintenance and application effect analysis of the prescription pre-review system in a tertiary hospital in China.中国某三级医院处方前置审核系统的建立、维护及应用效果分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Jul 1;25(1):853. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12901-8.
2
Recognizing and preventing unacknowledged prescribing errors associated with polypharmacy.识别并预防与多重用药相关的未被确认的处方错误。
Arch Public Health. 2024 Sep 4;82(1):146. doi: 10.1186/s13690-024-01381-7.
3
Evaluation of prescriptions from tertiary care hospitals across India for deviations from treatment guidelines & their potential consequences.

本文引用的文献

1
GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction.GRADE证据到决策(EtD)框架:一种做出明智医疗选择的系统且透明的方法。1:引言。
BMJ. 2016 Jun 28;353:i2016. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i2016.
2
Partial updating of clinical practice guidelines often makes more sense than full updating: a systematic review on methods and the development of an updating procedure.部分更新临床实践指南往往比全面更新更有意义:方法系统评价及更新程序的开发。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2014 Jan;67(1):33-45. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Oct 11.
3
评估印度三级保健医院的处方是否偏离治疗指南及其潜在后果。
Indian J Med Res. 2024 Feb 1;159(2):130-141. doi: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2309_22. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
Cochrane 协作网评估随机试验偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d5928.
4
QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies.QUADAS-2:用于诊断准确性研究质量评估的修订工具。
Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
5
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.GRADE 指南:1. 简介-GRADE 证据概况和发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
6
AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care.《AGREE II:推进卫生保健领域的指南制定、报告与评估》
CMAJ. 2010 Dec 14;182(18):E839-42. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.090449. Epub 2010 Jul 5.
7
Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.AMSTAR的开发:一种评估系统评价方法学质量的测量工具。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2007 Feb 15;7:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-7-10.
8
Of studies, syntheses, synopses, summaries, and systems: the "5S" evolution of information services for evidence-based healthcare decisions.论研究、整合、概述、总结及体系:循证医疗决策信息服务的“5S”演变
Evid Based Med. 2006 Dec;11(6):162-4. doi: 10.1136/ebm.11.6.162-a.