Applied Sports Technology, Exercise Medicine Research Centre (A-STEM), Swansea University, United Kingdom.
Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Bournemouth University, United Kingdom.
J Sci Med Sport. 2022 Feb;25(2):162-166. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2021.08.017. Epub 2021 Aug 28.
To compare two modes (general and cricket-specific) of morning priming exercise on afternoon physical and cognitive performance, and subjective readiness to perform in professional male cricketers.
Randomised, crossover, counterbalanced.
On three occasions, 16 professional men's cricketers completed afternoon tests of countermovement jump height, cricket-specific sprint performance (running between the wickets, two runs), cognitive function (Stroop test, time taken), and subjective readiness to perform. Control (CON; passive rest), lower-body resistance exercise priming (LIFT; trap bar deadlifts, 6 × 4 repetitions up to 85% of one repetition maximum), or cricket-specific running priming (RUN; 6 × 35.36 m sprints including a 180° change of direction) interventions were implemented 5.5 h before testing.
Afternoon sprint times were faster in RUN (-0.04 s, p = 0.013) and LIFT (-0.07 s, p < 0.001) versus CON, and faster in LIFT than RUN (-0.03 s, p = 0.032). Jump height (+1.1 cm, p = 0.021) and cognitive function (-3.83 s, p = 0.003) were greater in LIFT than CON, whilst RUN outperformed CON for cognition (-2.52 s, p = 0.023). Although perceived readiness was not influenced by trial (p > 0.05), players reported favourable responses on the "aggression" subscale in LIFT relative to CON (+1 arbitrary unit, p = 0.022).
Both general (lower-body resistance exercise) and cricket-specific (simulated running between wickets) morning priming are effective match-day strategies to improve afternoon markers of physical and cognitive performance in professional men's cricketers. Practitioners may thus be afforded flexibility in situations where resistance exercise is not feasible on the morning of a match.
比较两种晨间预热运动模式(一般模式和板球专项模式)对专业男性板球运动员下午身体和认知表现及运动准备状态的影响。
随机、交叉、平衡设计。
16 名职业男子板球运动员在 3 次试验中分别完成下午的测试,包括:反跳高度、板球专项冲刺表现(跑垒,2 次)、认知功能(斯特鲁普测试,用时)和运动准备状态自评。控制组(CON;被动休息)、下肢抗阻运动预热(LIFT;挺举,6×4 次,达到 1 次最大重复重量的 85%)或板球专项跑预热(RUN;6×35.36m 冲刺,包含 180°变向)干预在测试前 5.5 小时进行。
与 CON 相比,下午冲刺用时在 RUN(-0.04s,p=0.013)和 LIFT(-0.07s,p<0.001)中更快,且 LIFT 比 RUN 更快(-0.03s,p=0.032)。LIFT 组的跳跃高度(+1.1cm,p=0.021)和认知功能(-3.83s,p=0.003)均优于 CON 组,而 RUN 组在认知方面优于 CON 组(-2.52s,p=0.023)。尽管试验对感知准备状态没有影响(p>0.05),但运动员在 LIFT 中报告的“攻击性”子量表的反应更为积极,优于 CON(+1 个任意单位,p=0.022)。
一般(下肢抗阻运动)和板球专项(模拟跑垒)晨间预热均为专业男性板球运动员下午身体和认知表现的有效比赛日策略。因此,在比赛当天早上进行抗阻运动不可行的情况下,从业者可能会有更多的选择。